|
|
ANNOUNCEMENTS &
NEW ITEMS:
Currently another TWO Articles
are undergoing peer review.
(2020 May 29): Now published: "Natural Cause of Galaxy
Rotation" now appears in the American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Revolutionary. Press Release.
(2020 May 22): Now published:
Law of Physics 20th-Century Scientists Overlooked (Part 1) … –The
historic failure of scientists to recognize this law led to a momentous
misinterpretation of Edwin Hubble’s redshift observations. Their oversight
of a remarkable simple principle connecting light and gravity had
revolutionary consequences —it gave birth to the preposterous expanding
universe concept. Find out exactly why the big bang hypothesis has no
scientific foundation.
Abstract. Pdf download.
Reprinted by permission of PEP, from Physics Essays, Vol.33,
No.2, pp163-174 (2020 June).
(2020 May 7): Updates on the tyranny and enslavement:
“Pandemic parallels: The COVID-19 climate changer” –Just Right program
#653
David Duke interviews Dr. Anthony G. Beck who has been “practicing
integrated medicine for 26 years … and has been researching the coronavirus.”
–Radio program
2020 May 5
“This is no longer a viral pandemic. It is a political, economic, and social
disaster, made possible by decades of drifting morally, intellectually, and
politically Leftward. Fueled by the evil and inverted morality of altruism,
the Left condemns the ‘selfishness’ of those who wish to independently
survive and praises the ‘sacrifice’ of those forced to give up their
livelihoods and freedoms.” –The COVID-19 credibility gap (Just
Right program #652)
(2020 April 30): Never imagined it would be so easy to enslave the masses of
the world. The global puppet masters must surely be laughing and, no doubt,
are wondering why so relatively few of the victims are fighting back or even
resisting! Sadly, there are simply too many gullible people. Professor James McCanney sums up the situation, “People have been watching football and
beauty pageants while their country has been stolen from them in the
background. … Welcome to the New World Order!” –Science
Hour, 2020 April 23, radio program (@44:25 min mark). Although Professor
McCanney is wrong about many things, he most certainly understands the
nature of the enemy.
Meanwhile: The revolutionary research into the "Natural Cause of Galaxy
Rotation" has been accepted for
publication in the American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics.
(2020 April 10): Year after year our freedoms were incrementally taken away.
Now, as of March/April 2020, we live in a police state. Robert Metz of
Just Right Media reports on the dire situation: Program #648
and Program #649
(2020 April 3):Whatever the “problem”, governments seemingly always make it
worse.
Just Right Media Program #648
(2020-4-2): “First, we were faced with a coronavirus health pandemic.
Then, world governments created a second crisis by shutting down their
economies and precipitating an unemployment pandemic and a financial
pandemic. Now, it appears that we have a serious COVID-19 ‘statistics
crisis,’ which may in the end be the one most responsible for precipitating
all the fear and panic … There is also evidence surfacing that the
statistics are being manipulated to present a false picture of the
situation.”
(2020 March 27): Freedom fades, tyranny advances:
“History has repeatedly demonstrated that government-declared emergencies
are too often simply a justification for violating individual freedom.
History also demonstrates that the violation of life, liberty and property
kills —and has killed— more people than any flu virus ever has. What needs
to be spread is a ‘virus’ of liberty, not a pandemic of government control.”
–Just
Right Media, 2020 March 26 program
(2020 March 20): According to Professor James McCanney, corona-virus tests
are giving results that are 80% false positive. He also reports that “China
is back to normal.” Link to his radio program of
2020 March 19 (and
March 26).
(2020 March 6): Local Webpage was reformatted and its technical problems
were fixed. See
The Story of a Baffling
Omission in Modern Cosmology.
(2020 Feb 14): February 14-16 marks the 75th anniversary of the senseless and
diabolical destruction of Dresden (in 1945). An event that should
always be remembered.
“Killed a hundred
thousand civilians in two hours”
(2020 January 31) Latest DSSU research paper is currently under review: This
one deals with the natural cause of galaxy rotation. Motivated by the
recent awarding of the Nobel Prize to James Peebles for, in part, “how
galaxies have formed and evolved.”
(2019 December 20): After considerable delay, the
History of the Aether Theory —with its
extensive chronicle (Table) of the development of aether theory— has now
been UPDATED (with new table entries for 1900, 2015, 2017, and 2018).
(2019 December): New webpage-article For Educators has been posted:
The Nobel
Foundation Endorses the Unsubstantiated Dark Matter Hypothesis
(2019 November): Some brief comments on
Fantasyland Physics
(2019 October 24): Canadians have voted to allow the invasion of the country
to continue —and worse— to allow it to expand!! Inevitably, ever more precious farmland
will be urbanized. … With the 2019 October National election, Canadians have
turned their backs on freedom of speech, freedom in general, and acquiesced
to the Country’s continuing descent along the path of socialism and fascism.
Very, very sad.
Link to the JustRightMedia Oct-31st commentary
and the Nov-7th analysis.
(2019 October 10): Several new webpages have been added and serve as “Resources
for Educators, Instructors, & New-Cosmology Enthusiasts.”
DIRECTORY
(2019 September 20): Canadian broadcaster
Robert Metz focuses on cosmology and gives a
masterful presentation —a superb show in which he exposes the
absurdity of the Big Bang hypothesis, delves into some key aspects of the
DSSU, and praises the veracity of the modern steady-state perspective.
Listen to the Just
Right program #623 originally broadcast around the world over the
internet and on shortwave radio on 2019 September 19.
(2019 August): German philosopher praises Cellular Universe website and
endorses DSSU theory. [Link to
his comments]
This month of August marks the 19th anniversary of DSSU
theory.
(2019 August): Corruption of justice in Canada continues. White Man
sentenced to one year in jail for the “offence” of exercising his
constitutional right of free speech! While for the same “offence” (and in
the very same trial) Native Man sentenced to optional reconciliation session
and NO jail time! Editors, publishers, writers, and researchers take note.
LINK to
several postings on the persecution of Dr James Sears and LeRoy St.
Germaine.
(2019 August 10): Corruption of justice in Germany continues.
Alfred Schaefer
Receives 18 Months Additional Prison Time for Defending Himself! Punished for simply presenting evidence
for his own defense in court! Alfred’s sister has posted this
8-minute video.
(2019 July 1): New webpage
posted:
●Highlights ●Reviews
●Comments relating to the recently published
article "Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical
Mechanism".
(2019 June 1 & June 7): New
research paper dealing with the physical nature of length contraction
has been published. Physical Nature of Length
Contraction (Part 2) How the Electron Elongates While Its Orbit Contracts,
... See the Press Release (2019
June) for details.
(2019 May 1): New DSSU article reveals how a simple extension of
Einstein’s relativity radically changes black-hole physics.
Published in the Journal
of High Energy Physics, ... See the Press Release (2019 May) for details.
(2019 April 12): Response to a reader’s Question on the root (the origin) of
“information” in the universe.
Response to a reader’s Question on the extraction of
energy from aether.
(2019 March 30): Currently two articles are undergoing peer-review and
another one is being prepared.
Meanwhile the suicide of Western Nations continues. Check
this out: Popular philosopher Stefan Molyneux discovered that in
British Colombia it would have cost him and the event organizers $40,000 to
stop violent attacks and to peacefully exercise their constitutional right of freedom-of-speech!
(Link
to the Molyneux video of 2019-3-20)
It gets worse. Socialism as a death sentence!
Just Right program #603, (2019-4-11)
(2019 March 20): Article revealing how energy is extracted from
nonmaterial aether has just been published in the current issue of INFINITE
ENERGY Magazine. See the Press Release
(2019 March) for details.
(2019 March 14): Oppression of freedom: Powerful discussion on the
evil of the political center: “Left, Right, and
the Extreme Center” (Just Right #599 Audio program, Mar.14, 2019)
(2019 February 13, 14, & 15): Three days of remembrance and mourning: the
horror and tragedy of the Dresden Holocaust (1945, Feb 13-15), the
most devastating single terrorist event in the history of mankind. [
HELLSTORM ]
(2019 January): Regarding the latest DSSU research article: The theoretical
and evidential proof of total mass-to-energy conversion was rejected by the
Canadian Journal of Physics. Unable to find errors in the physics or
flaws in the logic, the editor Dr. Michael Steinitz and his anonymous
Associate Editor dismissed the Paper as being too technical in nature and
not being a “topic of high interest for the widest audience of physicists.”
… Who would have guessed? The editors of Canadian Journal of Physics
find basic first-year university physics too technical!! … Regarding the
other excuse, I politely asked the editors: “Do you seriously believe that
your target audience, mostly physicists and others with an earnest interest
in the physical sciences, would not value this new insight!? Should they not
be made aware of this new knowledge?” No response! … So ends another
FAKE REVIEW. –CR
(2018 December 28): See Press
Release: Unprecedented Unification of
Gravity Theory.
(2018 December 1): Unification-of-gravity paper has been accepted for publication.
(2018 November 22): Here we go again! Latest paper rejected.
Reason? “The paper contains too many acronyms …” How many? Hey! It
contains only one well-known acronym (DSSU)!
Although clearly written and logically presented with an easy to
follow style (text, examples, mathematics, graphics), the Reviewer/Editor
found the article “impenetratable [sic] and therefore impossible to referee
in any detail.” … No examples, no particulars, it was just hopelessly
“impossible to referee.”
The seeking and exposing of errors is the essence of a legitimate
review process. Evidently the Reviewer/Editor failed to find anything that
could be considered demonstrably false, and so, found it necessary to
concoct BS objections (well-known acronym for bovine excrement). What
happened here was simply a fake review. –CR
(2018 September 27): New research paper on GRAVITY is currently under
review. … Details the unification of all five aspects of gravity …
Presents a remarkable new development in the theoretical nature of gravity
waves. …
(2018 September):
Fan of DSSU comments on the “train wreck”
of modern physics and on big bang mythology.
(2018 September 1): PUBLISHED:
Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme
Energy Particles, Physics Essays
Vol.31, No.3, pp.358-376 (2018).
(2018 August): Press Release (2018 August):
"The
mechanism driving astrophysical jets has been discovered"
(2018 July 31): What’s the delay? Yes, the usual publication frustrations:
■ Journal 1: peer reviewed, no errors in the logic, no flaws in the
science, tentative ACCEPTANCE, then REJECTED !
■ Journal 2: peer reviewed, no errors in the logic, no flaws in the
science, REJECTED !
Could it be that the editors promoting fake astro-science feel
threatening by the DSSU revolution? …
■ Journal 3: peer reviewed, “This is a scholarly and erudite
article that deserves to be published in recognition of its tutorial nature
and … the validity of the author’s proposals.” ACCEPTED for publication.
The article —Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme
Energy Particles— is toxic and revolutionary! Details to follow. –CR
(2018 May 24): Two papers are
currently under review. Meanwhile, work has begun on a new research
paper ---delving deeper into the amazing properties of aether.
(2018 April 28):
Question: What drives astrophysical jets?
What process or mechanism generates the stupendous power of those
spectacular emission jets associated with certain stars? (I’m talking about
gamma photons and neutrinos with energy equivalent to a million hydrogen
atoms!! Imagine that much energy contained in a single gamma photon or
neutrino!)
This has been one of the biggest mysteries of the universe
—one that has baffled the academic cognoscenti for decades.
The answer will be revealed in the next research article,
which is currently under review. And as the followers of DSSU theory
have come to expect, the answer is perfectly natural; the concepts are
straightforward, the arguments logical, the conclusions compelling, the
implications profound.
(2018 February 1): Research paper Sachs-Wolfe Effect Disproof
has been published in in the International Journal of Astrophysics and
Space Science.
Abstract & links.
Reprint
(download PDF).
(2017 December 30): Press release: The
Sacks-Wolfe Effect has now been disproved. … Expansion Cosmology has
lost its last supporting pillar. …
(2017 December 29): Another powerful research paper … another devastating
blow for the Big Bang … the
"Sacks-Wolfe Effect Disproof " has been
accepted for publication in an international journal for astrophysics.
(Details to follow within a few days.)
(2017 December): Comment posted:
Galaxy age
misinterpretation. Does cosmic distant have any relationship to a galaxy’s
age?
(2017 December): 2nd printing of "The Nature of Gravitational Collapse":
(Details)
(2017 November): Special purchase offer on the book "Guide to the
Construction of the Natural Universe": (Mail-in Order Form.)
(2017 Sept): Recently brought to my attention: DSSU material appears on The
New Illuminati website accompanied by some amazing graphics.
New Illuminati
–The DSSU is The New Cosmology
New Illuminati –Hidden Substrate of Reality
–History of the Aether Theory
(2017 Sept): "Assorted Comments" added to
QuestionsAnswersComments.
(2017 July): The book The Nature of Gravitational Collapse is
now available.
The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
Subtitle: How the photon, the particle of light, is responsible for mass,
gravity, superneutron stars, and supermassive black holes
—Reveals the truth about stellar and supermassive black holes.
This work contains 311+ pages, 67 illustrations, references, and
index. …
Second printing details (2017 November)
First printing details (Lambert Academic
Publishing).
(2016 December): “So easy to
understand” comment from an Australian engineer.
(2016 November): “Large-Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady
State Universe” now
published in the
American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.6,
2016, pp.65-77.
Astract and Links to HTML and PDF.
(2016 June):
Revolutionary research paper:
The Nature of Gravitational
Collapse –published in the
American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.2,
2016, pp.15-33.
Abstract and Links:
—Another
major DSSU success, as it reveals amazing new insights! The theory has
uncovered the mechanism by which mass undergoes a total conversion to
energy. Yes, a mass to energy conversion with 100% efficiency! As everything else in the DSSU, it is a
perfectly natural process. Truly amazing!
(2016 April 26): A mathematical cosmologist claims the values of the
Hubble-expansion parameter and the cosmic-background temperature are the
most important elements for understanding the real Universe!
Letter and response.
(2016 March): What is the difference between a physical and a
mechanical aether? ...
Be aware of the distinctions among the terms commonly applied to aether:
Terms such as physical, mechanical, subquantum, and dynamic.
Link to new Question & Answer.
The book, Guide to the Construction of the Natural Universe, is now available at the
Niagara Falls Public Library (Victoria branch). If you
live in the Province of Ontario, your local library can request the book
from the Niagara Falls
Public Library.
Participate in a unique exploration of the Cosmos: venture into the
sub-atomic realm, even into the sub-quantum realm where the roots of reality
reside, and into the domain of cosmic-scale cell-structure and beyond to
infinity. Along the way, discover the cause of mass, the cause of
gravitation, and rediscover Einstein’s “nonponderable” aether and Heraclitus’
harmony-of-opposites principle. … The book represents the ultimate
vindication for all the skeptics who resisted the "preposterous" Big Bang
mythology and who refused to join the exploding-cosmos religion.
The book contains 317 pages, 61 illustrations, references, and
index …
Available from
C-FAR Books.
Or use this
mail-in Order Form.
My comments on the 2016 "Official Science"
news story:
Do not be misled by the recent reports of the detection of gravity waves.
What the LIGO apparatus measures is the interference from beams of
self-generated electromagnetic waves. It seems highly probable that what
LIGO actually detected was some vibrational “noise” or some unexplained
interference; and NOT gravity waves originating from a distant binary system
(in which two extremely massive black holes are supposedly in the process of
merging). How the data, the wave patterns, are interpreted is subject to
theory and restricted by theory. Naturally the official
interpretation must conform to the Officially-sanctioned theory of gravity
—Einstein’s general theory of relativity. Thus, the light patterns recorded
by LIGO are interpreted via Einstein’s mathematical concept of gravity. The
problem is the general-relativity-gravity interpretation, as is well known,
ignores the space medium!
Have gravity waves really been detected?
Think about this: The academic experts do not have the cause and mechanism
of gravity (Isaac Newton did not, Albert Einstein did not, and today’s
big-bang astrophysicists do not). Their theory of gravity is embarrassingly
incomplete! So, if they do not yet understand the nature of gravity itself,
how then can they claim to be able to recognize the waves that gravity
supposedly emits? The experts cannot even answer the simple question:
Specifically, what is it that is waving? What is waving back and forth?
Here is something else the reports fail to mention: The
gravity waves that are actually detectable are those associated with the
turbulence in the aether flow (the space medium streaming through our Solar
System).
Australian physicist Reginald T. Cahill has been examining these aether-flow
waves for over 15 years. –CR (2016 May)
Updated 2016 June: See Comment #19
Updated 2018 Dec: See
Press Release 2018-12
(2016 Jan 6): Published:
Olbers’
Paradox Resolved for the Infinite Non-Expanding Universe, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
Vol.4, No.1, (2016 January).
Abstract & download links.
Excerpts:
● “The man accredited with discovering universe expansion did not believe
that the universe was expanding. Hubble was convinced that the key evidence,
the cosmic redshift, was caused by some other factor, something more
fundamental than mere expansion.”
● “With the recent discovery of a new cosmic-redshift mechanism, and its
theoretical validation, it turns out that Hubble was right.”
● Explains how “an infinite, non-expanding, perpetually regenerating
universe" is able to predict a dark night sky.
Press Release (2015 Oct 15):
The Big Bang is no longer a viable hypothesis !
(2016 June):
FREE DOWNLOAD:
"DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence",
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, pp.455-473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "well-written and incisive
article."
(2015-Oct 6): Webpage added for article Cosmic-Redshift Distance Law Without c
Without H: –Comments &
Links– Describes the challenge of getting DSSU papers
published.
(2015 Aug 20): Allow me to extend a sincere "Thank You" for the many
invitations to join social media and professional networks.
Unfortunately I must decline. It’s simply a matter of precious time —there
is just too little of it. All my available time is taken up by research,
writing, and website maintenance —in fact, two more web domains have been
purchased. It is all being done for the purpose of providing the educated
and interested public with the ammunition to refute and replace the utterly
bankrupt big-bang Worldview. (However, not to give the impression of a total
recluse, seclusionist, or misanthrope, I do manage to squeeze in a few
delightful hours of ballroom dancing every week or two.) –CR
(2015 Aug): Brief update on the status of the neutrino and its
adaptation into the DSSU particle theory. See
Section 5 of
the Discussion webpage
for the article: The Fundamental Process of Energy
(2015 Aug): The article
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 1) has been revised.
(2015 July):
Comments and questions from
a 14-year old student.
(2013):
Higgs Boson Discovered?
After 50 long years of searching, Physicists claim to have detected the
Higgs boson, the "particle" that ostensibly bestows the property of mass on
all other such particles. Is it now time to celebrate? … Definitely not.
The question now is this: If the Higgs ‘particle’ is the giver
of mass to all other particles, what then gives the Higgs itself its mass?!
(Yes, the newly discovered particle has mass, lots of it!) A difficult and
embarrassing question indeed. It is like asking: If
God created everything, then who, or what, created God?
While physicists think they have solved the mass problem, the
reality is that they have unwittingly exposed an even bigger problem —the
riddle of “First Cause”.
RECENT
RESEARCH PAPERS:
Mass-to-Energy Conversion,
the Astrophysical Mechanism –Published in Journal of High Energy
Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, Vol.5, No.2 (2019).
HTML version.
Nature’s Supreme Mechanism
for Energy Extraction from Nonmaterial Aether –Published in
Infinite Energy
Magazine Vol.24,
Issue#144 (2019 March/April)
The Nature of Gravity –How One Factor Unifies Gravity’s Convergent,
Divergent, Vortex, and Wave Effects –Published in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol.6,
No.5, 2018.
-------------------------
Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme
Energy Particles –Published in Physics Essays
Vol.31, No.3, p358 (2018). (Reprint)
-------------------------
Sachs-Wolfe Effect Disproof –Published in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol.6, No.1, 2018. (
Abstract & Links.)
"The Nature of Gravitational Collapse"
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics. (
Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig-10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r2.)
|
|
Glossary of Terms
used in Cosmology and Astrophysics with particular emphasis on DSSU theory.
(Opens in separate Window or Tab)
|
|
GENERAL INTEREST ARTICLES:
Mysteries & Paradoxes that Plague Standard Cosmology
(Updated 2015-7)
Cosmology Crisis of 1998 (Revised 2015-5)
Critique of Conventional Cosmology ...
comments relating to the 'preposterous' expanding-universe paradigm.
Bafflement
—the remarkable admission of a physicist.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
—During the 20th century there was a decades-long debate: The cataclysmic
expanding universe VS the stable expanding universe. But there has never
been a debate of the dynamic expanding universe VS the dynamic
non-expanding universe. (Posted
2011 Oct)
Models of the Universe
—Historical, Expanding, and Cellular universes. INCLUDES A USEFUL TABLE FOR
COMPARING THEORIES.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 1)
—overcoming a "central" problem of cosmology theories.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 2)
—an explanation of how the universe can always have existed and will always
exist.
DSSU, The
Non-Expanding Universe: Structure, Redshift, Distance
—A long sought-after goal of astrophysicists has been a formulation of cosmic distance that is
independent of the speed of light. The goal has now been achieved. The
present Paper details the surprisingly simple distance expression and its
validating agreement with Supernova data.
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force.
(Re-Posted February, 2014)
Gravity and Lambda —A Story of Opposites
(.htm) —A story of opposites in harmony. Key differences between the Conventional
Cosmology and the New Cosmology are presented.
Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system.
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Questions & Answers & Comments
|
|
COSMOLOGY ARTICLES, etc:
(2016 June) FREE DOWNLOAD details:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455-473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "well-written and incisive
article."
The Dynamic Steady State Universe.
This work brings together the main pieces of the cosmic
puzzle in a step-by-step construction of the Natural Universe.
Published in Physics
Essays Vol.27 No.2 (2014 June issue) (PDF download) "... the arguments
are well-made. The article is competent, enjoyable and readable." —Reviewer
for Physics Essays Journal
Revolutionary:
Olbers’
Paradox Resolved for the Infinite Non-Expanding Universe, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
Vol.4, No.1, (2016 January).
Abstract & download links.
Excerpts:
● “The man accredited with discovering universe expansion did not believe
that the universe was expanding. Hubble was convinced that the key evidence,
the cosmic redshift, was caused by some other factor, something more
fundamental than mere expansion.”
● “With the recent discovery of a new cosmic-redshift mechanism, and its
theoretical validation, it turns out that Hubble was right.”
Cosmic Redshift in the Nonexpanding Cellular Universe (
Journal links
) —details the actual causal mechanism. Published in the
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol.2, No.5 (2014)
Abstract.
Local copy with quality images: (Reprint pdf).
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Entirely new concept for cosmic redshift mechanism;
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology;
• But does not require whole-universe expansion;
• A redshift based on the DSSU theory of unified gravity & cosmic cellular
structure;
• Remarkable agreement with independently established redshift distances.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
What historians call "the greatest cosmological debate in
history” was between TWO expanding universes —two
hypothetical models that share the same, I repeat, the same
foundational property! If one is to claim some great clash of ideas (let
alone the "greatest") then surely there must exist some deep dividing
difference! (Posted 2011-10)
The Case for a Cellular Universe
—the Story of a Baffling Omission in Modern Cosmology (Revised 2015)
Large-Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe published in
the American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.6,
2016, pp.65-77.
Astract and Links.
Highlights:
■ Presents the first 2 of the 4 main postulates that define the DSSU.
■ Space-medium expansion and contraction are perpetually held in balance,
thus ensuring a non-expanding universe.
■ Explains how the two dynamic processes of the DSSU’s space medium sustain
the cellular structure responsible for the pattern of matter distribution in
our Universe.
Galaxy Morphology:
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics,
AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Journal
Abstract and Links.
Local
high-resolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA here.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the first-ever natural explanation for the cause of the
elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the
absurd concept of whole-universe expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and
exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very
same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!
Cosmic-Redshift Distance Law Without c
Without H –Comments &
Links– Simplifying the redshift-distance formula by removing the
speed-of-light constant and the Hubble parameter —while maintaining
agreement with observational evidence.
|
|
DSSU Theory:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455-473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "well-written and incisive
article."
A historical tour of
universes culminating with the Natural Universe —This
essay gives a thematic tour of historical and modern universes. ... While the Universe
is endlessly speaking, forever sending signals; philosophers and scientists
listen and interpret.
Currently undergoing revision and updating: Theoretical Foundation and Pillars of the Dynamic Steady State Universe —The first complete presentation of all four
postulates of DSSU theory. A powerful paper that resolves the
cause-of-causes paradox, explains the non-independent nature of time, and
reveals the 'supreme advantage'. It includes a concise comparison with
standard cosmology focusing on real-world viability.
Supplementary Discussion: The
Primary Process
The Fundamental Process of Energy —A Qualitative Unification of
Energy, Mass, and Gravity. (Abstract
& Reviews & Links) … This article reveals
the secret behind photon confinement. (Contains only a bare minimum of mathematics
and mainly in one of the 14 sections.)
PART 1 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #113 (Jan/Feb 2014)
PART 2 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue
#114 (Mar/Apr 2014)
Headlined as:
A "Conceptual Unification of Energy, Mass and Gravity"
Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system.
Unified Gravitation Cells
of the DSSU —Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells
Space Flow
Equations and Expansion-Contraction Rates (pdf) —This paper
explores the mathematical aspects of the two space postulates of DSSU
theory —and uncovers some profound consequences.
|
|
ARTICLES on AETHER:
Documentary
movie footage in which Einstein states, "There exists an aether"
—High
resolution .mpg video.
—Low
resolution .wmv video.
The
Aether Experiments and the Impact on Cosmology
—Aether was detected first in 1887 and then several more times during the
20th century. Its 21st–century "rediscovery" (in 2001) led to the long-sought causal mechanism of
gravity —a discovery which, in turn, is revolutionizing cosmology.
Michelson-Morley and the
Story of the Aether Theory —Richard Milton's analysis of the
historical details involving the misrepresentation, bias, and cover-up that
hampered the Aether theory.
The History of the Aether Theory
—The historic development of the
aether as a scientific theory of space itself. What started as the "fifth
element" of Antiquity becomes molded by theoretical constraints and
experimental evidence into the dual-dynamic sub-quantum medium —the Essence of the Universe.
(Updated
2016-2)
Relativity of
Time in the Aether-Space of the DSSU —How intrinsic time and relative time are related.
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to Aether-Space —Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
Physical Nature of Length Contraction
—the DSSU Theory of Length Contraction Induced by Absolute Motion.
An easy to follow examination of how the mode by which matter is “conducted”
through luminiferous aether causes the matter to contract. A simple
derivation of the mathematical expression for this physical phenomenon is
presented. There is also a brief discussion of relevant historical aspects
and of nonphysical length contraction.
Reviewer's comments:
“This is amazing …” “The paper is interesting …” –Applied Physics
Research reviewer. Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.1
(2013
Feb).
Contradiction Divides Two Aether Theories
—An exploration into the three parts of the speed-of-light postulate.
Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays Journal
(Vol 24, No.3, Sept, 2011)
...
ABSTRACT
Basic-level mathematical and graphical exploration of dynamic aether flow:
PDF
Here is an external webpage with an extensive list of
research papers on the aether-drift experiments, and the larger question of energy in space.
|
|
DSSU RESEARCH PAPERS:
Sachs-Wolfe Effect Disproof (published in in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science Vol.6, No.1, 2018.)
Abstract & links.
DSSU Cosmic Redshift-Distance Relation (htm)
—Converting the cosmic redshift into distance for our Cellular Universe using
a simple and elegant equation.
Large Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe (pdf)
How a dual-dynamic space medium sustains the cellular structure (published in AJAA in 2016).
—Presents the postulates and implications of regional space-medium expansion and contraction.
Cosmic-Scale Structural Features Explained (pdf)
(Chapter 2 of original DSSU Manuscript)
—The Spacing of Clusters
—Sheets of Galaxies
—Supernodes
—Right-angled Walls of Galaxies.
The Cosmic Background Radiation in the DSSU
—The natural explanation of the microwave background radiation applicable to
the natural Cellular Universe.
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies,
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Journal
Abstract and Links
Local
high-resolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA here.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the first-ever natural explanation for the cause of the
elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the
absurd concept of whole-universe expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and
exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very
same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!
|
|
GRAVITY:
The Nature of
Gravity –How One Factor Unifies Gravity’s Convergent, Divergent, Vortex, and
Wave Effects
–Published in International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science
(IJASS),
Vol.6, No.5, 2018, pp.73-92. (Abstract and Links.)
The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics Vol.4,
No.2, 2016, pp.15-33. (Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig-10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r2.)
Gravity and Dark Energy (How they
Shape the Universe) –An Introduction. Provides a preamble and overview
for a couple of earlier DSSU articles.
The Processes of Gravitation –The Cause and Mechanism of Gravitation
by C. Ranzan –A revolutionary paper on gravity published in J. Mod. Phys.
Appl. Vol.2014:3 (2014).
(Abstract & Reviews & Links.
Includes link to hi-resolution PDF) "Revolutionary".
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force. (Rev 2011-9)
First ever, journal-published paper featuring the DSSU:
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
–Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol 23, No1, p75-87 (2010 Mar).
ABSTRACT
This is the cure for the fallacious belief in cosmic-scale Dark Matter.
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
(Color version) –Ranzan
Considered "an excellent contribution to the [PE journal]" --professional reviewer
(2010).
Unified Gravitation Cells of the DSSU
—Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells
|
|
RELATIVITY ARTICLES:
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
(●Abstract ●Links ●Excerpts ●Extras)
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Einstein’s Simple Mathematical Trick –and the Illusion of a Constant Speed
of Light
(Abridged version with links to Journal-published version. Posted 2013)
Extended Relativity –Exploiting the Loopholes in Einstein's Relativity.
A Logical extension of special relativity. Reprinted by permission of
PEP,
from
Physics Essays Vol.25, No.3 (2012).
— Abstract & Links & Reviews —
The Three Components of the Speed-of-Light Postulate.
Published in Physics Essays journal Vol.26,No.1 (2013)
Local copy:
The
Three Components of the Speed-of-Light Postulate (pdf):
Absolute vs relative. Variance vs invariance. Another instance of the Heraclitian
"Harmony of Opposites." (Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol.26, No.1,
2013).
Relativity of Time in the Aether
Medium of the DSSU
—Absolute Motion and Intrinsic Time
Resolving a Paradox in Special Relativity –Absolute Motion and the Unified Doppler Equation.
(Posted 2011, July). Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.4, p594 (2010).
ABSTRACT
How DSSU Relativity Resolves the Speed Paradox (Introductory Discussion)
—Absolute Motion Resolves a (speed) Paradox in Einstein’s Special Relativity.
(Supplementary Discussion)
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to Aether-Space
(Posted 2011). Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 1)
—Response to a reviewer critical of DSSU aether-based relativity
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 2)
—How to convert abstract-space equations into aether-based equations
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy
Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.2
(2013).
LOCAL COPY:
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy —distinguishing
between the apparent energy and the real energy of moving mass.
|
|
An Open Letter to the Scientific Community
(Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of
hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark
matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there
would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers
and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics
would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a
way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the
least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.
..."
continues
...
A devastating Declaration of opposition to Big Bang cosmology
signed by more than 400 Researchers.
For the full text click on:
CosmologyStatement.org
or alternate
site.
|
|
INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM:
This website is mainly concerned with revisionism in cosmology. Those of us
involved in replacing the unnatural expanding-universe paradigm are aware of
the difficulties involved.
However,
other revisionists have unimaginable difficulties. Consider the ongoing
persecution of revisionists in other fields of intellectual pursuit:
"It makes you wonder —about the immense effort being made
by State and State-sponsored organizations with budgets of tens of millions
of dollars and thousands of employees and associates to smother and punish
these few men and women. Every punishing instrument imaginable is used,
every vicious slander conceivable, every flagrant and pervasive form of
censorship that law allows, including the imprisonment of simple writers for
thought crimes against the State. ... Makes you wonder." —Bradley R. Smith (2011)
"Discussing truth is so controversial, so dangerous … In most of the world it is simply illegal.”
–
Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, Veterans Today (2011)
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who
speak it." –George Orwell
|
DEDICATION: This website is solemnly dedicated to those
individuals who have conducted research in their chosen field and have
informed others of their inquiries and suffered the consequences when
subpoenaed by the Inquisition or some variant thereof. The dedication
extends to those individuals currently imprisoned, and those facing
trial and persecution simply for exercising their basic human right of
freedom of expression supposedly granted to them under the UN Charter of
Human Rights.
"Every
year, hundreds of writers and other literary professionals around the world
are imprisoned, prosecuted, persecuted, attacked, threatened, forced into
exile or even murdered as a result of their work."
ALSO: Be aware of the continuing threat to our precious freedom of expression on the
Internet. The threat is serious and relentless. It is described as “… the formal effort to mimic Communist China’s
system of Internet censorship.” See
The Secret Behind SOPA
(2012-Jan).
Update.
More information on threats to internet freedom: https://battleforthenet.com/
Reporter-journalist
Arthur Topham, Canadian victim of the Inquisition,
arrested (2012) for posting his research.
“Arthur Topham faces prison time for daring to speak his mind on his own website, as he
faces criminal charges under Canada’s hate crimes legislation contained in
Section 318 - 320 of the criminal code.” –Rights and Freedoms Bulletin Issue
No. 204 Feb 7, 2015.
VERDICT: Arthur Topham found “guilty” AND “not guilty” of hate speech
by a brain-dead jury!
–Dr. James Sears, reporting in “The world’s
Largest Anti-Marxist Publication” (Issue 2015 December,
http://www.yourwardnews.com/backissues.html)
2016 Update: Panel
Discussion on The Trial of Arthur Topham
Free-speech crusader Bill Whatcott defies British Colombia
Human Rights Tribunal efforts to impose gender language tyranny.
“I have no intention on wasting money on a lawyer for the Morgane Oger vs
Bill Whatcott case, as human rights tribunals are kangaroo courts and the
odds of … getting justice in these biased tribunals is next to zero.” –2017
June (www.freenorthamerica.ca
…)
End of free speech in Britain:
A publisher of history books in Britain has reported that “due to new laws
in the UK all their books will have to be censored moving forward” to avoid
criminal penalties for “inciting racial hatred.” –The Barnes Review (2020 March/April)
p77
A hostile jury, by a hasty unanimous
verdict, decided that Nationalist Leader Jez Turner deserves to be sent to
jail for his critical views! Report (2018-5-15).
British Maverick Psychologist
jailed for publishing his research. … “The ambivalence of librarians
getting writers imprisoned quite defies comprehension.” –Simon Sheppard
(2013)
The repression of free speech in Canada has degenerated to the point where …
■ Freedom advocates, such as Marc Lemire, are censured for merely expressing
their reasoned opinions. Freedomsite, whose motto is “Fighting
for freedom against the censorship enforcers”, documents the official
persecution.
■ A tenured professor has lost his position for revealing his research and
views on history. This is unprecedented. Professor Anthony J. Hall at the
University of Lethbridge, Alberta, has been suspended (2016 October 5)
without pay.
“… Any thinking person should recognize that there is something deeply wrong
when a history professor is persecuted for saying we should be able to
examine our history.” –Monika Schaefer 2017
■ A publisher/editor, for expressing his reality-based views, has been
denied postal services. Dr. James Sears, publisher and editor of
Your Ward News was
stripped of Canada Post Mail Service by government order (2016 June).
■ A violin teacher and truth revealer, Monika Schaefer, for posting a
video (an apology to her dead mother), has been attacked by various
so-called community leaders.
“The treatment of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free
and democratic society.” –The American Herald Tribune, 2016 Sept
■ American
Speaker Arrested in Canada for the textual material on his iPad
—2017 June 24
While the invasion continues, the “guardians” of the nation are busy
suppressing the freedom of expression: going after deemed violations in what
people think and write and say.
■
Canada Claims Authority to Censor Your Internet Searches –Reason
magazine
■ The "justice"
system is being used to suppress opinions: In a legal battle (2018) for freedom of speech in Canada
... the
prosecution and silencing of Dr. James Sears expected to cost taxpayers $20 million!
“I estimate the Board of Review, police investigating and
Crown prosecuting us on criminal matters, will cost the taxpayers over $20
million, assuming no appeals past 2018 (murderers & rapists will walk free
as huge blocks of court time bump their cases, causing them to be thrown
out).”
–Dr. James Sears, Your Ward News, Fall, 2018, p17
Updates are posted at
www.yourwardnews.ca .
Update for 2019 April 8:
Why the ruling against Your Ward News hurts free speech in Canada
Updates for 2019 Aug: LINK to Several postings.
Update for 2020:
Sentenced to one year in
jail for revealing the truth.
The Continuing Struggle for Freedom
A ray of hope in the ongoing struggle for freedom. Populist and nationalist
movements around the world are gaining ascendancy over the New World Order’s
effort to establish global governance and impose tyrannical control over
every last square meter of the Earth’s surface. –The Barnes Review
Vol.23 No.1 (2017 Jan p70)
"This
Is Very Serious" –S. Molyneux, 2018-7
(7-minute
video on the importance of freedom of speech)
In repressive Germany:
Ursula Haverbeck,
89, Sentenced to 14 Months in Jail for Heresy! –2017 November
This amazing 89-year-old woman continues advocating under the dictum: "Only
the truth will set you free”.
Mrs. Haverbeck, along with her late husband, founded the education facility
Collegium Humanum in 1963, but which was banned by the Marxist thought police in
2008.
Update (2018-5-16): Ursula Haverbeck will celebrate her 90th birthday in a
German prison
cell. The sprightly grandmother is now serving a
two-year prison term without parole merely for stating a sincerely
held opinion that is supported by acclaimed academics worldwide!!
“Frau Haverbeck is now sentenced to two years in prison, merely for her
peaceful historical research” –The Barnes Review Vol.24, No.5
(Sept/Oct 2018) p71
UPDATE (2019-11):
On November 9th (2019), the very day of Ursula Haverbeck’s 91st. birthday,
hundreds of German nationalists, patriots and friends, well-wishers and
admirers rallied in her support. Report on the Rally to Celebrate
Political Prisoner Ursula Haverbeck.
INFO on Monika Schaefer's case: https://wir-sind-monika.com/
For expressing her opinion on historical events, Canadian citizen
Monika Schaefer has been arrested and imprisoned
(2018-1-3) in Germany. She had committed no crime. Author Mike Walsh warns
potential visitors to Germany to stay away from this dangerous police state.
–Merkel
Madness Grips Germany, (2018-1-7)
... Found guilty and sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment (time
served); her brother Alfred was sentenced to 38 months!! –(2018
November)
UPDATE (2019 August 10): Corruption of justice in Germany continues.
Alfred Schaefer
Receives 18 Months Additional Prison Time for Defending Himself!
Punished for simply presenting evidence for his own defense in court!
For more on Freedom (and Objectivism),
visit:
Freedomain Radio (www.freedomainradio.com)
presented by Stefan Molyneux.
Just Right Media (www.justrightmedia.org)
|
|
... about the author ...
.jpg)
© Copyright 2005-2020 by
Conrad Ranzan & DSSU Research
For information regarding permission to reproduce selected material herein, please contact:
D S S U Research
Niagara Falls, Canada
19th year on the Internet.
Most recent update:
2020 May 29
Visits since mid-2010 :
2020-5-29
|
| |
Extended Relativity –Exploiting the Loopholes in Einstein’s Relativity
• Abstract
• Links
• Reviews
• Discussion
A Logical Extension of Special Relativity
Conrad Ranzan
2012
1. Abstract & Links
Abstract: Several loopholes in the logic structure of
Einstein’s special relativity (ESR) are detailed. The exploitation of the
loopholes leads to what is being called Extended relativity (also referred
to as DSSU* Extended relativity). The Extended Lorentz transformations are
presented; as well as the Extended relativity equations for time, length,
momentum, mass, and kinetic energy. The optical interferometer experiments
of Michelson & Morley and of Miller are analyzed and discussed. The
significance of the difference between the vacuum-mode and gas-mode
interferometer experiments is emphasized. While one experiment mode is
consistent with a key hypothesis of Einstein; the other mode exposes a
serious flaw. The repeated discovery of light-speed anisotropy, also
referred to as the detection of absolute motion, exposes the inadequacy and
incompleteness of the Einstein postulates. Essentially, the present Paper
charts a course by which relativity theory can be made more inclusive and
conform to the existence and detectability of ‘absolute’ motion.
* DSSU is the acronym for Dynamic Steady State
Universe. It is a model based on the premise that all things are
processes.
Keywords: Special
relativity; DSSU extended relativity; relative motion;
absolute motion; preferred frame; aether space; Lorentz transformation;
lightspeed anisotropy; Dynamic Steady State Universe.
Extrait: Deux échappatoires dans
la structure logique de la relativité spéciale d'Einstein (ESR) sont
détaillées. L'exploitation des échappatoires mène à ce qui s'appelle la
relativité Prolongée (également désignée sous le nom de la
relativité-prolongée de DSSU*). Les transformations prolongées de Lorentz
sont présentées; aussi bien que les équations de la relativité prolongée
pendant le temps, la longueur, le moment, la masse, et l'énergie cinétique.
Les expériences optiques d'interféromètre de Michelson & Morley et de Miller
sont analysées et discutées. La signification de la différence entre le
mode-vide et le mode-gaz des expériences d'interféromètre est soulignée.
Tandis qu'un mode d'expérience est compatible avec une hypothèse principale
d'Einstein; l'autre mode expose un défaut sérieux. La découverte répétée de
l'anisotropie de lumière-vitesse, également désignée sous le nom de la
détection du mouvement absolu, expose l'insuffisance et l'imperfection des
postulats d'Einstein. Essentiellement, le papier présent dresse un cours
par lequel la théorie de la relativité peut être rendue plus incluse et
conforme à l'existence et à la détectabilité du mouvement 'absolu`.
* DSSU est
l'acronyme pour l'univers équilibré dynamique. C'est un modèle basé sur l’idée
que toutes les choses sont des processus.
Extended Relativity
–Exploiting the Loopholes in Einstein's Relativity (Preprint of the article published in
Physics Essays Journal (2012 Sept); © 2012 copyright
publisher PEP). Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication)
Citation: C. Ranzan,
"Extended Relativity –Exploiting the
Loopholes in Einstein's Relativity,"
Physics Essays
Vol.25, No.3, pp327-346 (2012 Sept).
Abstract
DOI Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-25.3.327
Terminology note: The
justification of the term “Extended relativity” rests, in large part, on
the theory’s ability to extend/expand the speed of light postulate so
that it accounts for (i) the intrinsic speed of light in its conducting
medium; (ii) Einstein’s lightspeed invariance in accordance
with certain experiments; and (iii) theory-predicted lightspeed
variance in accordance with other experiments. As presented in
the article:
· The
explanation of the intrinsic speed of light involves the mechanism of
light conduction by the space medium —aether.
· The
explanation of lightspeed constancy, for all uniformly moving observers,
involves the two-way-light-path method of measuring lightpulses.
· The
explanation of lightspeed non-constancy involves a necessary feature
imposed by the existence of a light-conducting aether. The presence of this
luminiferous medium requires that the speed of propagation is dependent on the
aether-imposed intrinsic value (300,000 km/s) plus the motion of the aether
itself. In other words, the one-way-light-path measure of the speed of
lightpulses may vary. |
2. Reviews
| |
"Let me congratulate you for yet another outstanding paper.
'Loopholes' is a winner. I read it through and found it to be thoughtfully and beautifully
rendered. It's no easy task to take on Einstein's [oversight]
but you do this without destroying Relativity Theory ---you simply
extend Special Relativity by proving the DSSU aether flow as being
absolute and dynamic ... in this process of extending Special
Relativity you are laying the groundwork for your next paper. I
love how you went about developing the powerful irrefutable
Michelson-Morley, Miller, and Bradley evidence. You didn't miss
a beat either ---by extending the Lorentz transformations to back this
up and strengthen your case. Your figure illustrations, comparative
tables, and flowcharts, bolster your text and thankfully were easy to
understand. The material you covered on 'length contraction', 'speed
of light relative to aether flow and velocity measurements' are
nicely presented. As tough as math is for me I came away from
reading this paper both enlightened and enthused and gained a new
appreciation for equations regardless of being unable to handle the
unfamiliar symbol nomenclature and algebra. I believe having recently
read Mario Livio's book on Symmetry[1] helped me to appreciate and
trust the symmetry that your back-up equations reveal. I will read and
study this paper again and again ... "
–Roger Ferragallo (California, 2010 Feb 8) |
|
[Note: Roger has perused more books on cosmology and cosmology
related topics than even I have! –CR]
Reference
- ^ Mario Livio, The Equation that Couldn't be Solved
(Simon & Schuster, New York, 2005)
|
3. Review with Author's Response
–The Meaningful Question
One professional reviewer believes that a proper analysis of the
air-mode Michelson-interferometer experiment should predict a null result
(i.e., no fringe shift) and kindly suggests a way to do the analysis to
achieve a null prediction.
The reviewer, however, completely overlooks the fact that the actual
experiments give positive results (i.e., measurable fringe shifts)!
If an experiment gives positive results —as the Miller experiments
consistently produced— then you would certainly want your theory to predict
positive results. Yet the reviewer would like to see, in the paper, a negative (null)
prediction!! ... What can I possibly say?
Anyway, here are the reviewer's comments followed by my
(slightly expanded) response.
|
Reviewer (A) item 17: ... I believe that the reason DSSU [theory]
predicts a non-null result is that the speed of light in the gas analyzed
in the present paper does not take into account the fact that the gas is
moving with respect to the aether. I believe that once the latter effect is
included, a null prediction will be obtained.
(I believe this is how Lorentz agrees with Einstein on such a test, but I haven’t worked out the
details myself.) –per 2010 August review |
Author’s response: The speed of the air, with respect to aether,
should not be of any concern. (Keep in mind, Lorentz’s aether can be
ignored since it was supposedly undetectable; Einstein, of course, did not
use an aether.) Why should there be any concern as to the speed of
the air?—after all, the air is the
same in both arms of the interferometer apparatus. The real question should
be, why is the speed of light different for the two perpendicular directions
of the apparatus arms? The speed of light is supposed to be, by postulate,
the same in all directions —and it should not matter in the least whether
one takes measurements in vacuum or in air. The air in and around the
apparatus is not moving —it is isotropic. The meaningful question is, why
is the speed of light not isotropic in an isotropic medium?
The Lorentz theory and the ESR theory struggle to find an answer. It is a simple
question; it deserves a straightforward answer. None has previously been proffered.
But, aside from the observation of basic anisotropy, there is a far more
devastating issue here. The real concern —the one that checkmates
conventional relativity— should be with the fact that, regardless of the
experimental method, the direction of maximum anisotropy (the direction of
absolute motion or, the same thing, the direction of aether flow) is found
to be remarkably consistent. The direction is always toward the same region
of the celestial sphere!
As a point of interest: It is the fact that the relativity purists, many
years ago, in the years following 1933, failed to acknowledge the checkmate
situation and, instead, allowed the game to continue. Since they couldn’t
deal with the evidence coming from Dayton Miller’s experiments, the
strategy was to simply dismiss it and ignore it; and, oh yes, derision of person
and ideas was part of the strategy. Even science writer Martin Gardner, in
at least one of his books, participated in ridiculing Miller and his work.
But the evidence was there; and the game dragged on. It dragged into a new
century.
In the year 2002, with the discovery of the causal mechanism of gravity,
the application of a new physics, and other developments, the checkmate
argument was back —and for this round it was back in full strength.
The relativity purists are now probably fewer in number (or at least in
proportion) but they seem not to have changed their game plan. And,
predictably, they still don’t have a meaningful answer.
The Einstein theory (as well as the Lorentz theory) is unable to say
why the speed of light is not isotropic in an isotropic medium. Within
Einstein’s special relativity the question remains: Why is the speed of
light different in two different directions?
What about the supporting evidence? Do other experiments, in addition to
Miller’s, agree with the DSSU analysis?
As pointed out in the Manuscript: The value of 360 km/s that DSSU theory
predicts from the Miller data is within 13.8% of the modern experimental
value of 418 km/s obtained by Australian physicist Reginald T. Cahill in
2006. The method employed a combination coaxial RF cable and an optical
fiber. Significantly, it was not an interferometer experiment.
The DSSU analysis [in the present Paper] is also supported by the
findings of the Roland DeWitte experiment conducted in Brussels, in 1991.
The DeWitte coaxial cable experiment (a 1st-order-effect device) using
atomic clocks revealed a speed of absolute motion of approximately 400
km/s.
That the DeWitte and the Cahill experiments are not Michelson
interferometers is highly significant.
|
“That these very different experiments [Miller’s interferometer and
DeWitte’s atomic clocks] show the same speed and RA of absolute motion is
one of the most startling discoveries of the twentieth century.”
–R.T. Cahill, The Michelson and Morley 1887 Experiment and the Discovery of
Absolute Motion (Progress in Physics Vol.1, Issue 3, 2005) p29
|
Incidentally, the Michelson-and-Morley velocities, in 1887, were lower
than Miller's
primarily because the geographical latitude of Cleveland was less favorable
than that of Mt Wilson (the site of Miller’s experiments).
|
4. Supplementary Discussion
Myth of the Null Report
Why, in the search for the aether, were so many null results
reported? There are, it is quite true, a considerable number of published
experiments reporting null results of the Michelson-Morley type tests. There
are basically two reasons:
(1) The result really is null and is due to the fact that the
experiment was conducted in vacuum mode. This has increasingly been the case
over the decades as more precise instruments and better vacuum chambers have
become available. The more effective the vacuum, the closer the index of
refraction is to 1, the more complete is the cancellation effect due to the
Lorentzian length contraction of the apparatus.
(2) A null result is reported even though the observations
themselves are definitely not null. The observations were merely less than
had been expected (often considerably less). This was the case with
Michelson, 1887; Illingworth, 1927; and Joos, 1930. In those experiments,
the length-contraction effect
was not taken into account.
The fact is Michelson and Morley did not report null
results. In their 1887 paper in The American Journal of Science, “the
results of the observations are expressed graphically in fig. 6.” And
that graph clearly shows fringe displacements between 0.01 and 0.02 of the
wavelength (of sodium light). As the authors explain, since the
interference-pattern displacement is proportional to the square of the
velocity, the corresponding relative velocity of the Earth and the aether is
between 5 km/s and 7.5 km/s. Now think about what a motion of 5 to 7.5
kilometers per second means. In terrestrial terms this is incredibly fast —the
entire range is over 15 times the speed of sound in air (331 m/s in air
0°). It is a speed that cannot be ignored.
Reconciling Contradictory Claims of Aether Motion
Theoretically, it has been proven that the detection of
aether motion is quite impossible; and yet several experiments have
demonstrated the reality of aether motion.
Aether motion has been demonstrated. Here is an
excerpt from one of Professor Cahill’s papers giving the extent to which
such motion has been detected: “That the speed of light is always c
(≈300,000 km/s) relative to any observer in nonaccelerating motion is one of
the foundational concepts of physics. Experimentally this was supposed to
have been first revealed by the 1887 Michelson-Morley experiment, and was
made one of Einstein’s key postulates of Special Relativity in 1905.
However, in 2002 the actual 1887 fringe shift data was analysed for the
first time with a theory for the Michelson interferometer that used both the
Fitzgerald-Lorentz contraction effect, as well as the effect of the air on
the speed of light. That analysis showed that the data gave an
absolute motion speed in excess of 300 km/s. So far
six other experiments have been shown to give the same result. ...”
–Cahill, The Speed of Light and the Einstein Legacy: 1905-2005,
Infinite Energy Vol.10, Issue 60, pp28-37 (Jan 2005)
Aether motion is impossible to demonstrate! In 1905,
on the 5th of June, Henri Poincaré published an important work Sur la
dynamique de l'electron which claimed that it was impossible to
demonstrate absolute motion and provided an explanation for the
Michelson-Morley “null” result. His explanation still stands when applied to
the null result obtainable with a vacuum-mode Michelson interferometer.
How to reconcile the above two Contradictory Claims:
First of all, the very fact that there is a specific speed
and not just any speed —the speed of light being 300,000 km/s and not
100,000 km/s— necessitates the existence of a light conducting medium. It is
some fundamental property of the space medium that dictates the fixed speed
of propagation.
Clearly aether must exist. And any motion of the aether would
be made evident by the observance of a variance in the speed of light.
Lorentz could explain the intrinsic speed of light by virtue
of his postulated luminiferous-and-static aether; and he could 'explain' the
apparent constancy of the speed of light by virtue of his transformation
equations (the constancy was built into the equations). But, by uncritically
accepting the validity of Poincaré’s proof, he was unable to explain the
detection of aether. He believed that the FitzGerald-Lorentz length
contraction prevented the Michelson-Morley experiment from detecting the
aether flow and was convinced that the aether could not be detected; and so
the Lorentz aether theory was limited in dealing with the growing evidence
of the actual detection of aether flow.
The reconciliation comes about by recognizing that two
factors, in combination, prevent the detection of aether motion: (i) The
two-way-light-path method of measuring lightpulses and (ii) the presence of
a vacuum. If either condition is absent, then it becomes possible to
actually detect
aether motion.
It is possible to detect aether motion if a
one-way-light-path method of measuring is employed. And it is also possible
if a gas surrounds the light beam of the measuring apparatus; for instance, if the arms of
a Michelson interferometer are surrounded by gas (such as ordinary air).
And where does Einstein’s relativity fit into all this?
Einstein embedded into his definition of simultaneity a clock
synchronization method that required a two-way light path. In order to stay
within the definition of simultaneity and time interval at different places,
light pulses must be measured by the out-and-reflected-back method. The
result is that the speed of light will APPEAR constant for all observers
regardless of uniform motion —regardless of uniform motion of the observer
or of the light source. Remove the two-way condition and you step outside
the domain of special relativity.
Conjuring Up Unreal Worlds
Mathematicians Attempt to Extend Einstein's Relativity
I persistently emphasize how DSSU theory is firmly rooted in
reality. To better appreciate this aspect, it is always fascinating to take
note of the wild speculations of other theorists. Two experts in applied
mathematics at the University of Adelaide, James M. Hill and Barry J. Cox,
have published a piece claiming to extend Einstein's special relativity
beyond the speed of light. Their formulas extend special relativity to a
situation where the relative velocity can be infinite, and can be used to
describe motion at speeds faster than light.*
“We are
mathematicians, not physicists, so we’ve approached this problem from a
theoretical mathematical perspective,” said Dr Cox. “Should it, however, be
proven that motion faster than light is possible, then that would be game
changing.”
“Our paper doesn’t try and explain how this could
be achieved, just how equations of motion might operate in such regimes.”
What? “Motion faster than light”? Are they seriously
suggesting the possibility that a physical particle or entity can overtake
a propagating pulse of light?! Such a scenario is extremely doubtful. It is
pure mathematical fantasy.
It is also a strange irony —the incongruity that within
mathematics, the most disciplined of the sciences, the very Queen of
sciences, within the science of the purest pursuit of reason, one is able
to conjure up unreal worlds with unreal spatial dimensions through which
unreal speeds are unrestricted.
* J. M. Hill and B. J. Cox, Einstein's special relativity beyond the
speed of light, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2012, doi:
10.1098/rspa.2012.0340 |
5. Summary Table
The logic loophole in Einstein’s special relativity theory, its most
basic loophole, allows one to make changes to its assumptions; this is
possible because they are not exclusive assumptions. The all-important fact
is that Einstein constructed an if-then argument and not an if-and-only-if
argument.
|
Relativity Theory Comparison |
|
Property |
Einstein’s special relativity |
Extended (DSSU) relativity |
|
Assumption: |
Basic assumption:
● Speed of light appears constant for all inertial observers. |
Compound assumption:
● There is a space medium (aether) and the speed of light is constant
with respect to it.
● Lightspeed in vacuum appears constant for all observers when measured
directly or indirectly by any two-way method.
● Lightspeed is variant when measure by a one-way light-path method. |
|
Further assumptions: |
● Laws of physics are the same for all observers.
● No special frame of reference. (The unnecessary assumption) |
● Laws of physics are the same for all observers.
● There is a special frame: defined by the space medium, aether. |
|
How the theory is derived: |
By applying the Lorentz transformations to geometric space. |
By applying the Lorentz transformations to aether-space. |
|
Theoretical conclusions: |
● Speed of light must appear isotropic. (Predicts light speed is the
same for all paths in the Michelson interferometer).
● No space medium.
● No absolute motion.
● No aether wind. |
● Speed of light in aether-space (the vacuum) appears isotropic.
● Speed of light through a physical medium appears anisotropic.
● Absolute motion is detectable.
● Aether wind is detectable. |
|
Experimental evidence: |
Vacuum-mode Michelson interferometer experiments are consistent with
theory assumptions (but does not prove those assumptions).
Gas-mode experiments are inconsistent with theory assumptions.
(They prove that at least one assumption is wrong.) |
Vacuum-mode experiments are consistent with theory assumptions.
Gas-mode experiments are consistent with theory assumptions. |
|
Limitations: |
Because of the theory’s ‘relative’ nature it fails to distinguish
between apparent and intrinsic effects. |
The theory IS able to distinguish between apparent and intrinsic
effects.
But the challenge is to determine the actual velocity, with respect to
the aether, for any particular situation. |
|
| |
"No fairer destiny could be
allotted to any physical theory than that it should of itself point
out the way to the introduction of a more comprehensive theory, in
which it lives on as a limiting case."
−Einstein, Relativity The Special and the General Theory
(Wings Books, New York, 1961) p86 |
|
| |
"The overthrow of
successful theories that were refined or replaced by more complete
theories is what makes up most of the history of science. But even as
a theory is replaced, it is important to recognize that this does not
make the supplanted theory wrong. ... Rather than saying one is right
and another wrong, I think of them as being more and less complete."
−Dan Hooper, Dark Cosmos (HarperCollins, New York, 2006)
p205-6 |
|
|
2016-1
|
|
Top of page
Back to DSSU Home Page
|
|
.jpg)