
|
ANNOUNCEMENTS &
NEW ITEMS:
(Most recent at top of column)
(2023 March 24 ... April 15): Latest research paper Nature’s Entropy-Lowering
Processes is currently under review.
Meanwhile: Tyranny in Canada! The persecution of Pastor Artur
Pawlowski. Listen to the incredible first-hand account: Just Right Program
#802 (2023-3-16)
(2023 February): DSSU research article currently being prepared deals with
entropy ... with a focus on Nature's remarkable entropy-lowering
mechanism.
(2023 January 16): Who would believe it! An American official holiday for
communism and its foremost promoter. Clearly the lessons of history have
been ignored … all the while the repression, and enslavement, continues.
(2023 January): DSSU Cosmology is now into its 22nd year
on the Internet —the revolution continues.
(2022 December 28): Now PUBLISHED !
“Laws of Physics Twentieth-Century Scientists
Overlooked”
Available on AMAZON.com
and on
amazon.ca
(2022 November 11): Remembrance Day in Canada (Veterans Day in USA,
Remembrance Sunday in Britain). Take a moment to reflect on the Allied
scheme for genocide: The Morgenthau Plan.
"After World War II ended, some in the Allied coalition
wanted to crush the already-prostrate German nation for standing up to its
banker-dominated New World Order agenda. Drafted by the Soviets and
initially scrapped, it was resurrected after the war for the sole purpose of
genociding as many Germans as possible." –The Barnes Review Vol.28, No.6
(2022 Nov) page 54
(2022 August 30): Press Release (2022 August).
(2022 August 20): The 20-year quest for the ultimate truth has paid off
… We now know how the energy of the Universe is continuously replenished.
The details are revealed in the Open Access Article “Mainspring
Mechanism of the Universe” published in the International Journal of
Cosmology, Astronomy and Astrophysics. Presented is the four-process
mechanism that drives and sustains the grand Cosmic system —now and forever.
Hi-resolution REPRINT.
Meanwhile … the decline of Western Civilization continues. Let us not
forget Ayn Rand’s warning:
“When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission
from men who produce nothing – When you see that money is flowing to those
who deal, not in goods, but in favors – When you see that men get richer by
graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them
but protect them against you – When you see corruption being rewarded and
honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – You may know that your society is
doomed.” –A. Rand, Atlas Shrugged, 1957
(2022 August 12): In the Just Right Media
program #771, Robert Metz reveals one of the great secrets of our
Universe. The Universe was never created! It had no beginning! … The
elegant and profound reasoning substantiating this claim is presented in the
fourth-quarter segment of the August 11th podcast.
(2022 August 1): The third DSSU book is ready for publication.
Particulars: Laws of Physics
20th-Century Scientists Overlooked
(2022 July 1): Current project: The third DSSU book is nearing
completion.
(2022 February 13-15): Dresden Hellstorm days of
remembrance. Ask yourself, what could possibly motivate a people to
machinate and implement the total destruction of the most beautiful and
cultural city on the planet? Search deeply into your inner self, and reflect
on the mind-polluting power of indoctrination.
Remembering Dresden 77 years after the terror bombing.
(2022 January 1): The "Directory" webpage has been updated.
ANNOUNCEMENTS & comments from
earlier years are available HERE.
|
The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
Subtitle: How the photon, the particle of light, is responsible for mass,
gravity, superneutron stars, and supermassive black holes
—Reveals the truth about stellar and supermassive black holes.
This work contains 311+ pages, 67 illustrations, references, and
index. …
Second printing details (2017 November)
First printing details (Lambert Academic
Publishing, 2017 July)
Guide to the Construction of the Natural Universe
Participate in a unique exploration of the Cosmos: venture into the
sub-atomic realm, even into the sub-quantum realm where the roots of reality
reside, and into the domain of cosmic-scale cell-structure and beyond to
infinity. Along the way, discover the cause of mass, the cause of
gravitation, and rediscover Einstein’s “nonponderable” aether and Heraclitus’
harmony-of-opposites principle. … The book represents the ultimate
vindication for all the skeptics who resisted the "preposterous" Big Bang
mythology and who refused to join the exploding-cosmos religion.
The book contains 317 pages, 61 illustrations, references, and
index …
Available from
C-FAR Books.
Or use this
mail-in Order Form.
(Also available at
Niagara Falls Public Library)
POPULAR RESEARCH PAPERS:
Mass-to-Energy Conversion,
the Astrophysical Mechanism –Published in Journal of High Energy
Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, Vol.5, No.2 (2019).
HTML version.
Nature’s Supreme Mechanism
for Energy Extraction from Nonmaterial Aether –Published in
Infinite Energy
Magazine Vol.24,
Issue#144 (2019 March/April)
The Nature of Gravity –How One Factor Unifies Gravity’s Convergent,
Divergent, Vortex, and Wave Effects –Published in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol.6,
No.5, 2018.
-------------------------
Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme
Energy Particles –Published in Physics Essays
Vol.31, No.3, p358 (2018). (Reprint)
-------------------------
Sachs-Wolfe Effect Disproof –Published in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol.6, No.1, 2018. (
Abstract & Links.)
"The Nature of Gravitational Collapse"
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics. (
Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig-10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r2.)
|
Glossary of Terms
used in Cosmology and Astrophysics with particular emphasis on DSSU theory.
(Opens in separate Window or Tab)
|
GENERAL INTEREST ARTICLES:
Mysteries & Paradoxes that Plague Standard Cosmology
(Updated 2015-7)
Cosmology Crisis of 1998 (Revised 2015-5)
Critique of Conventional Cosmology ...
comments relating to the 'preposterous' expanding-universe paradigm.
Bafflement
—the remarkable admission of a physicist.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
—During the 20th century there was a decades-long debate: The cataclysmic
expanding universe VS the stable expanding universe. But there has never
been a debate of the dynamic expanding universe VS the dynamic
non-expanding universe. (Posted
2011 Oct)
Models of the Universe
—Historical, Expanding, and Cellular universes. INCLUDES USEFUL TABLES FOR
COMPARING THEORIES.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 1)
—overcoming a "central" problem of cosmology theories.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 2)
—an explanation of how the universe can always have existed and will always
exist.
DSSU, The
Non-Expanding Universe: Structure, Redshift, Distance
—A long sought-after goal of astrophysicists has been a formulation of cosmic distance that is
independent of the speed of light. The goal has now been achieved. The
present Paper details the surprisingly simple distance expression and its
validating agreement with Supernova data.
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force.
(Re-Posted February, 2014)
Gravity and Lambda —A Story of Opposites
(.htm) —A story of opposites in harmony. Key differences between the Conventional
Cosmology and the New Cosmology are presented.
Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system.
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Questions & Answers & Comments
|
COSMOLOGY ARTICLES, etc:
(2016 June) FREE DOWNLOAD details:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455-473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "well-written and incisive
article."
The Dynamic Steady State Universe.
This work brings together the main pieces of the cosmic
puzzle in a step-by-step construction of the Natural Universe.
Published in Physics
Essays Vol.27 No.2 (2014 June issue) (PDF download) "... the arguments
are well-made. The article is competent, enjoyable and readable." —Reviewer
for Physics Essays Journal
Revolutionary:
Olbers’
Paradox Resolved for the Infinite Non-Expanding Universe, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
Vol.4, No.1, (2016 January).
Abstract & links.
Reprint PDF.
Excerpts:
● “The man accredited with discovering universe expansion did not believe
that the universe was expanding. Hubble was convinced that the key evidence,
the cosmic redshift, was caused by some other factor, something more
fundamental than mere expansion.”
● “With the recent discovery of a new cosmic-redshift mechanism, and its
theoretical validation, it turns out that Hubble was right.”
● Explains how “an infinite, non-expanding, perpetually regenerating
universe" is able to predict a dark night sky.
Cosmic Redshift in the Nonexpanding Cellular Universe (
Journal links
) —details the actual causal mechanism. Published in the
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol.2, No.5 (2014)
Abstract.
Local copy with quality images: (Reprint pdf).
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Entirely new concept for cosmic redshift mechanism;
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology;
• But does not require whole-universe expansion;
• A redshift based on the DSSU theory of unified gravity & cosmic cellular
structure;
• Remarkable agreement with independently established redshift distances.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
What historians call "the greatest cosmological debate in
history” was between TWO expanding universes —two
hypothetical models that share the same, I repeat, the same
foundational property! If one is to claim some great clash of ideas (let
alone the "greatest") then surely there must exist some deep dividing
difference! (Posted 2011-10)
The Case for a Cellular Universe
—the Story of a Baffling Omission in Modern Cosmology (Rev2014)
Large-Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe published in
the American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.6,
2016, pp.65-77.
Astract and Links.
Highlights:
■ Presents the first 2 of the 4 main postulates that define the DSSU.
■ Space-medium expansion and contraction are perpetually held in balance,
thus ensuring a non-expanding universe.
■ Explains how the two dynamic processes of the DSSU’s space medium sustain
the cellular structure responsible for the pattern of matter distribution in
our Universe.
Galaxy Morphology:
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics,
AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Journal
Abstract and Links.
Local
high-resolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA here.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the first-ever natural explanation for the cause of the
elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the
absurd concept of whole-universe expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and
exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very
same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!
Cosmic-Redshift Distance Law Without c
Without H –Comments &
Links– Simplifying the redshift-distance formula by removing the
speed-of-light constant and the Hubble parameter —while maintaining
agreement with observational evidence.
|
DSSU Theory:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455-473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "well-written and incisive
article."
A historical tour of
universes culminating with the Natural Universe —This
essay gives a thematic tour of historical and modern universes. ... While the Universe
is endlessly speaking, forever sending signals; philosophers and scientists
listen and interpret.
Currently undergoing revision and updating: Theoretical Foundation and Pillars of the Dynamic Steady State Universe —The first complete presentation of all four
postulates of DSSU theory. A powerful paper that resolves the
cause-of-causes paradox, explains the non-independent nature of time, and
reveals the 'supreme advantage'. It includes a concise comparison with
standard cosmology focusing on real-world viability.
The Fundamental Process of Energy —A Qualitative Unification of
Energy, Mass, and Gravity. (Abstract
& Reviews & Links) … This article reveals
the secret behind photon confinement. (Contains only a bare minimum of mathematics
and mainly in one of the 14 sections.)
PART 1 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #113 (Jan/Feb 2014)
PART 2 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue
#114 (Mar/Apr 2014)
Headlined as:
A "Conceptual Unification of Energy, Mass and Gravity"

Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system.
Unified Gravitation Cells
of the DSSU —Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells
Aether Flow
Equations and Expansion-Contraction Rates (pdf) —This paper
explores the mathematical aspects of the two space-medium postulates of DSSU
theory —and uncovers some profound consequences.
|
ARTICLES on AETHER:
Documentary
movie footage in which Einstein states, "There exists an aether"
—High
resolution .mpg video.
—Low
resolution .wmv video.
The
Aether Experiments and the Impact on Cosmology
—Aether was detected first in 1887 and then several more times during the
20th century. Its 21st–century "rediscovery" (in 2001) led to the long-sought causal mechanism of
gravity —a discovery which has revolutionizing cosmology.
Michelson-Morley and the
Story of the Aether Theory —Richard Milton's analysis of the
historical details involving the misrepresentation, bias, and cover-up that
hampered the Aether theory.
The History of the Aether Theory
—The historic development of the
aether as a scientific theory of the universal space medium. What started as the "fifth
element" of Antiquity becomes molded by theoretical constraints and
experimental evidence into the dual-dynamic sub-quantum medium —the Essence of the Universe.
(Updated
2019-12)
Relativity of
Time in the Aether-Space of the DSSU —How intrinsic time and relative time are related.
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to Aether-Space —Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
Physical Nature of Length Contraction
—the DSSU Theory of Length Contraction Induced by Absolute Motion.
An easy to follow examination of how the mode by which matter is “conducted”
through luminiferous aether causes the matter to contract. A simple
derivation of the mathematical expression for this physical phenomenon is
presented. There is also a brief discussion of relevant historical aspects
and of nonphysical length contraction.
Reviewer's comments:
“This is amazing …” “The paper is interesting …” –Applied Physics
Research reviewer. Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.1
(2013
Feb).
Contradiction Divides Two Aether Theories
—An exploration into the three parts of the speed-of-light postulate.
Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays Journal
(Vol 24, No.3, Sept, 2011)
...
ABSTRACT
Basic-level mathematical and graphical exploration of dynamic aether flow:
PDF
Here is an external webpage with an extensive list of
research papers on the aether-drift experiments, and the larger question of energy in space.
|
DSSU RESEARCH PAPERS:
Sachs-Wolfe Effect Disproof (published in in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science Vol.6, No.1, 2018.)
Abstract & links.
DSSU Cosmic Redshift-Distance Relation (htm)
—Converting the cosmic redshift into distance for our Cellular Universe using
a simple and elegant equation.
Large Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe (pdf)
How a dual-dynamic space medium sustains the cellular structure (published in AJAA in 2016).
—Presents the postulates and implications of regional space-medium expansion and contraction.
Cosmic-Scale Structural Features Explained (pdf)
(Chapter 2 of original DSSU Manuscript)
—The Spacing of Clusters
—Sheets of Galaxies
—Supernodes
—Right-angled Walls of Galaxies.
The Cosmic Background Radiation in the DSSU
—The natural explanation of the microwave background radiation applicable to
the natural Cellular Universe.
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies,
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Journal
Abstract and Links
Local
high-resolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA here.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the first-ever natural explanation for the cause of the
elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the
absurd concept of whole-universe expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and
exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very
same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!
|
GRAVITY:
The Nature of
Gravity –How One Factor Unifies Gravity’s Convergent, Divergent, Vortex, and
Wave Effects
–Published in International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science
(IJASS),
Vol.6, No.5, 2018, pp.73-92. (Abstract and Links.)
"Revolutionary"
The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics Vol.4,
No.2, 2016, pp.15-33. (Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig-10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r2.)
Gravity and Dark Energy (How they
Shape the Universe) –An Introduction. Provides a preamble and overview
for a couple of earlier DSSU articles.
The Processes of Gravitation –The Cause and Mechanism of Gravitation
by C. Ranzan –A revolutionary paper on gravity published in J. Mod. Phys.
Appl. Vol.2014:3 (2014).
(Abstract & Reviews & Links.
Includes link to hi-resolution PDF)
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force. (Rev 2011-9)
First ever, journal-published paper featuring the DSSU:
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
–Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol 23, No1, p75-87 (2010 Mar).
ABSTRACT
This is the cure for the fallacious belief in cosmic-scale Dark Matter.
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
(Color version) –Ranzan
Considered "an excellent contribution to the [PE journal]" --professional reviewer
(2010).
Unified Gravitation Cells of the DSSU
—Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells
|
RELATIVITY ARTICLES:
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
(●Abstract ●Links ●Excerpts ●Extras)
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Einstein’s Simple Mathematical Trick –and the Illusion of a Constant Speed
of Light
(Abridged version with links to Journal-published version. Posted 2013)
Extended Relativity –Exploiting the Loopholes in Einstein's Relativity.
A Logical extension of special relativity. Reprinted by permission of
PEP,
from
Physics Essays Vol.25, No.3 (2012).
— Abstract & Links & Reviews —
The Three Components of the Speed-of-Light Postulate.
Published in Physics Essays journal Vol.26,No.1 (2013)
Local copy:
The
Three Components of the Speed-of-Light Postulate (pdf):
Absolute vs relative. Variance vs invariance. Another instance of the Heraclitian
"Harmony of Opposites." (Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol.26, No.1,
2013).
Relativity of Time in the Aether
Medium of the DSSU
—Absolute Motion and Intrinsic Time
Resolving a Paradox in Special Relativity –Absolute Motion and the Unified Doppler Equation.
(Posted 2011, July). Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.4, p594 (2010).
ABSTRACT
How DSSU Relativity Resolves the Speed Paradox (Introductory Discussion)
—Absolute Motion Resolves a (speed) Paradox in Einstein’s Special Relativity.
(Supplementary Discussion)
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to Aether-Space
(Posted 2011). Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 1)
—Response to a reviewer critical of DSSU aether-based relativity
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 2)
—How to convert abstract-space equations into aether-based equations
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy
Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.2
(2013).
LOCAL COPY:
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy —distinguishing
between the apparent energy and the real energy of moving mass.
|
An Open Letter to the Scientific Community
(Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of
hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark
matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there
would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers
and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics
would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a
way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the
least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.
..."
continues
...
A devastating Declaration of opposition to Big Bang cosmology
signed by more than 400 Researchers.
Full text:
CosmologyStatement.org
or alternate
site.
|
INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM:
This website is mainly concerned with revisionism in cosmology. Those of us
involved in replacing the unnatural expanding-universe paradigm are aware of
the difficulties involved.
However,
other revisionists have unimaginable difficulties. Consider the ongoing
persecution of revisionists in other fields of intellectual pursuit:
"It makes you wonder —about the immense effort being made
by State and State-sponsored organizations with budgets of tens of millions
of dollars and thousands of employees and associates to smother and punish
these few men and women. Every punishing instrument imaginable is used,
every vicious slander conceivable, every flagrant and pervasive form of
censorship that law allows, including the imprisonment of simple writers for
thought crimes against the State. ... Makes you wonder." —Bradley R. Smith (2011)
"Discussing truth is so controversial, so dangerous … In most of the world it is simply illegal.”
–
Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, Veterans Today (2011)
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who
speak it." –George Orwell
●
Pro-Freedom RADIO: Rense Radio
● Pro-Freedom NEWS:
Vanguard News
● InfoWars NEWS: InfoWars
| AlexJones
● Freedom Force
Red Pill University
for truth-seekers.
|
DEDICATION: This website is solemnly dedicated to those
individuals who have conducted research in their chosen field and have
informed others of their inquiries and suffered the consequences when
subpoenaed by the Inquisition or some variant thereof. The dedication
extends to those individuals currently imprisoned, and those facing
trial and persecution simply for exercising their basic human right of
freedom of expression supposedly granted to them under the UN Charter of
Human Rights.
"Every
year, hundreds of writers and other literary professionals around the world
are imprisoned, prosecuted, persecuted, attacked, threatened, forced into
exile or even murdered as a result of their work."
ALSO: Be aware of the continuing threat to our precious freedom of expression on the
Internet. The threat is serious and relentless. It is described as “… the formal effort to mimic Communist China’s
system of Internet censorship.” –
www.InfoWars.com
More information on threats to internet freedom: https://battleforthenet.com/
Reporter-journalist
Arthur Topham, Canadian victim of the Inquisition,
arrested (2012) for posting his research.
“Arthur Topham faces prison time for daring to speak his mind on his own website, as he
faces criminal charges under Canada’s hate crimes legislation contained in
Section 318 - 320 of the criminal code.” –Rights and Freedoms Bulletin Issue
No. 204 Feb 7, 2015.
VERDICT: Arthur Topham found “guilty” AND “not guilty” of hate speech
by a brain-dead jury!
–Dr. James Sears, reporting in “The world’s
Largest Anti-Marxist Publication” (Issue 2015 December,
http://www.yourwardnews.com/backissues.html NOTE: This website has been
taken down by court order pending appeal. --2020)
2016 Update: Panel
Discussion on The Trial of Arthur Topham
Free-speech crusader Bill Whatcott defies British Colombia
Human Rights Tribunal efforts to impose gender language tyranny.
“I have no intention on wasting money on a lawyer for the Morgane Oger vs
Bill Whatcott case, as human rights tribunals are kangaroo courts and the
odds of … getting justice in these biased tribunals is next to zero.” –2017
June (www.freenorthamerica.ca
…)
End of free speech in Britain:
A publisher of history books in Britain has reported that “due to new laws
in the UK all their books will have to be censored moving forward” to avoid
criminal penalties for “inciting racial hatred.” –The Barnes Review (2020 March/April)
p77
A hostile jury, by a hasty unanimous
verdict, decided that Nationalist Leader Jez Turner deserves to be sent to
jail for his critical views! Report (2018-5-15).
British Maverick Psychologist
jailed for publishing his research. … “The ambivalence of librarians
getting writers imprisoned quite defies comprehension.” –Simon Sheppard
(2013)
The repression of free speech in Canada has degenerated to the point where …
■ Freedom advocates, such as Marc Lemire, are censured for merely expressing
their reasoned opinions. Freedomsite, whose motto is “Fighting
for freedom against the censorship enforcers”, documents the official
persecution.
■ A tenured professor has lost his position for revealing his research and
views on history. This is unprecedented. Professor Anthony J. Hall at the
University of Lethbridge, Alberta, has been suspended (2016 October 5)
without pay.
“… Any thinking person should recognize that there is something deeply wrong
when a history professor is persecuted for saying we should be able to
examine our history.” –Monika Schaefer 2017
■ A publisher/editor, for expressing his reality-based views, has been
denied postal services. Dr. James Sears, publisher and editor of
Your Ward News was
stripped of Canada Post Mail Service by government order (2016 June).
■ A violin teacher and truth revealer, Monika Schaefer, for posting a
video (an apology to her dead mother), has been attacked by various
so-called community leaders.
“The treatment of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free
and democratic society.” –The American Herald Tribune, 2016 Sept
■ American
Speaker Arrested in Canada for the textual material on his iPad
—2017 June 24
While the invasion continues, the “guardians” of the nation are busy
suppressing the freedom of expression: going after deemed violations in what
people think and write and say.
■
Canada Claims Authority to Censor Your Internet Searches –Reason
magazine
The Persecution of Dr James Sears
■ The "justice" system is being used
to suppress opinions: In a legal battle (2018) for freedom of speech in Canada
... the
prosecution and silencing of Dr James Sears expected to cost taxpayers $20 million!
“I estimate the Board of Review, police investigating and
Crown prosecuting us on criminal matters, will cost the taxpayers over $20
million, assuming no appeals past 2018 (murderers & rapists will walk free
as huge blocks of court time bump their cases, causing them to be thrown
out).”
–Dr James Sears, Your Ward News, Fall, 2018, p17
Updates are posted at
www.yourwardnews.ca .
Update for 2019 April 8:
Why the ruling against Your Ward News hurts free speech in Canada
Updates for 2019 Aug: LINK to Several postings.
Update for 2020:
Sentenced to one year in
jail for revealing the truth.
Update for 2021 July:
POLITICAL PRISONER
James Sears.
(2021 November 18): The Canadian Association for Free Expression Honours Dr
James Sears with the 2021 George Orwell Free Speech Award
● Editor of (anti-Marxist) Your Ward News
● Brilliant satirist, researcher, writer, free speech warrior & dedicated
anti-masker
● Recently (Oct 1)
released political prisoner
(2022 February): Dr James
Sears, Editor of Your Ward News and winner of the 2021 George Orwell Free
Speech award, was
arrested at GUNPOINT (Feb 3) by three police while leaving his regular
appointment with his parole officer. Sears is now back in prison.
Protests continue.
The Continuing Struggle for Freedom
A ray of hope in the ongoing struggle for freedom. Populist and nationalist
movements around the world are gaining ascendancy over the New World Order’s
effort to establish global governance and impose tyrannical control over
every last square meter of the Earth’s surface. –The Barnes Review
Vol.23 No.1 (2017 Jan p70)
"This
Is Very Serious" –S. Molyneux, 2018-7
(7-minute
video on the importance of freedom of speech)
The ongoing fight for freedom and truth. –Just
Right Media (2020, Sept 18, program)
In repressive Germany:
Ursula Haverbeck,
89, Sentenced to 14 Months in Jail for Heresy! –2017 November
This amazing 89-year-old woman continues advocating under the dictum: "Only
the truth will set you free”.
Mrs. Haverbeck, along with her late husband, founded the education facility
Collegium Humanum in 1963, but which was banned by the Marxist thought police in
2008.
Update (2018-5-16): Ursula Haverbeck will celebrate her 90th birthday in a
German prison
cell. The sprightly grandmother is now serving a
two-year prison term without parole merely for stating a sincerely
held opinion that is supported by acclaimed academics worldwide!!
“Frau Haverbeck is now sentenced to two years in prison, merely for her
peaceful historical research” –The Barnes Review Vol.24, No.5
(Sept/Oct 2018) p71
UPDATE (2019-11):
On November 9th (2019), the very day of Ursula Haverbeck’s 91st. birthday,
hundreds of German nationalists, patriots and friends, well-wishers and
admirers rallied in her support. Report on the Rally to Celebrate
Political Prisoner Ursula Haverbeck.
Update (2020-12): This 92-year-old peaceful woman has just
been released from jail, having spent 2&1/2 years behind bars, and less than
2 weeks later was in court in Berlin for more charges ... was
again sentenced to prison!!!
INFO on Monika Schaefer's case: https://wir-sind-monika.com/
For expressing her opinion on historical events, Canadian citizen
Monika Schaefer has been arrested and imprisoned
(2018-1-3) in Germany. She had committed no crime. Author Mike Walsh warns
potential visitors to Germany to stay away from this dangerous police state.
–Merkel
Madness Grips Germany, (2018-1-7)
... Found guilty and sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment (time
served); her brother Alfred was sentenced to 38 months!! –(2018
November)
UPDATE (2019 August 10): Corruption of justice in Germany continues.
Alfred Schaefer
Receives 18 Months Additional Prison Time for Defending Himself!
Punished for simply presenting evidence for his own defense in court!
The 2022 George
Orwell Free Speech Award was presented to Alfred and Monika Schaefer,
July 30, 2022 in Vancouver.
A Response &
Appreciation of the Awards to Monika & Alfred Schaefer, by Timothy Cuish
of the Daily Rake.
For more on Freedom (and Objectivism),
visit:
Freedomain Radio (www.freedomainradio.com)
presented by Stefan Molyneux.
Just Right Media (www.justrightmedia.org)
|
... about the author ...
Curriculum Vitae
© Copyright 2005-2023 by
Conrad Ranzan & DSSU Research
For information regarding permission to reproduce selected material herein, please contact:
D S S U Research
Niagara Falls, Canada
22 years on the Internet.
Most recent update:
2023 April 15
Visits since mid-2010 :

2023-4-15
|
| |
Cosmology Crisis of
1998
C. Ranzan
DSSU Research, Niagara Falls, Canada
Published on the Cellular Universe website (www.cellularuniverse.org ) 2005
rev2015-5
URL:
http://www.CellularUniverse.org/CrisisOf1998.htm
1. The Year the Standard Big Bang Model
Failed
In 1998 one
of the biggest science news story in decades unfolded. It was the year in
which the
generally accepted theory of the universe failed. The dramatic events were
almost immediately detailed in a PBS NOVA science program; and four
years later (in 2002) it was a televised feature story on the news program
60 Minutes. To convey the unexpected nature of the discovery, the 60 Minutes
story compared it to casually tossing your car keys into the air and
finding that they don’t fall back down! It was a memorable demonstration
of a puzzlement confronting advocates of Big Bang cosmology. Here was a situation that
had caught professional physicists off guard. The New York Times (January 1, 2002) reported the response to the discovery from one such
expert:
|
It’s
definitely the strangest experimental finding since I’ve been in
physics,
–Dr. Edward Witten, Institute for Advanced Studies
in Princeton |
|
Astronomers use a certain class of supernovae in a sophisticated
technique to measure cosmic distance. The class members serve as
"standard candles" for measuring and calibrating extraordinary cosmic
distances. Referred to as Type 1a, these extremely massive exploding stars
have a known absolute brightness and a characteristic brightness profile, making the explosion event ideal for determining
distance independent of the customary redshift method. The
brightness profile identifies an astronomical object as Type 1a. A
comparison between its theoretically known brightness and the apparent brightness makes
it possible to estimate its distance.
By the year 1998, researchers had perfected the method. And in that year, two
independent teams discovered that the universe of their authoritative
textbooks —the universe they thought they understood— was not behaving the
way it is supposed to. At first it seemed too incredible to be believed.
After an exhaustive check ruled out potential errors, they eventually
accepted the conclusion coded in the data. The consensus was that the few
dozen supernovae tested were 20 to 25 percent farther away than expected.
Now it may not seem like much, roughly a 1/4 fractional difference, but in
terms of absolute distance we are talking about a three-billion-lightyear
discrepancy (when determined with the DSSU redshift-distance equation).
The astronomer-physicists reluctantly concluded that their Big Bang
(BB) universe is not slowing down its expansion as had been
predicted, but rather it appears to be expanding at an ever faster rate!
The Big Bang universe was now accelerating! Or so it
was believed.
|
The fact that the universe is speeding up might be the biggest mystery in
all of science. –Michael Turner, University of
Chicago
[1] |
|
What a predicament! An embarrassing contradiction of standard theory.
And there was no explanation (at least momentarily) as to why the universe
seems to be speeding up, seems to be in acceleration mode. And so, 1998
was a crisis year for BB cosmology.

In the crisis year of 1998 astronomers found to their amazement that the predicted distance
(bottom curve) of supernova stars did not agree with their actual distance
(as measured be methods independent of their redshift). The supernovae
were actually about 25 percent farther away. If astrophysicists had
recognize the fundamental fact that the real Universe is structured into
repeating regions, that it has a grand-scale cellular structure, then they
would have found a remarkable agreement between measured distance and
predicted distance (upper curve). Their failure to recognize this fact,
embodied in the simple, elegant and valid, DSSU formulation (top
equation), serves to further compound the crisis. (The distance 300Mly is the size of
each cosmic cell measured in million lightyears. The symbol zcc is the
redshift across one cosmic cell. Redshift index spanned by this
graph is from 0 to 10.) |
2. Model Patching
Needless to say, BB proponents don’t like to call the failure of their
cherished model “a crisis” —too suggestive of a pending disaster. The
BB model, it should be pointed out, has struggled, and survived, through
more than
three-quarters of a century. It survived the attacks from the traditional
Steady State models and also the Quasi Steady State model. In hindsight,
it should have died long ago but its faithful devotees keep coming up with
one or another life-supporting patch. For instance, some years ago when someone checked
the numbers, an embarrassing mismatch was uncovered: The universe was
predicted to be considerably younger than many of the objects it contains.
The universe was supposed to be10 billion years old while its oldest known stars were
estimated to be about 14 billion years old!
[2]
[3] A patch was
needed and quickly adopted —something called inflation. Now
almost everyone knows the meaning of monetary inflation, but what
is the meaning of big bang inflation? ... Well, instead of just an
ordinary big bang, this inflation magically turns it into a supersonic big
bang. Inflation is the hypothesized super-fast (hyper-lightspeed-fast)
expansion of space, a brief birthing phase that launched the main
Big Bang event. But keeping in mind the original purpose, wouldn’t a
universe that grew faster be a younger universe? Wouldn’t this
make the age discrepancy worse instead better? The experts assured us the
explanation is counterintuitive and so the BB theory survived the
age-of the-universe problem. Then there was the horizon problem. It deals with the
question of why the temperature of the distant-and-early universe, which
astronomers observe in opposite directions, is so uniform. Regions that
are at opposite ends of the visible universe and unrelated with respect to cause
and effect inexplicably have identical energy states! To solve the horizon
problem, the inflation patch was adjusted and re-applied.
Professor Edward Wright provides a detailed
explanation
[4], aimed at the initiated, which may be helpful in gaining
understanding (but no
promises). The patched-up model of the 1970s and 1980s became known as the inflationary BB model. Jumping ahead to the year 1998, we find the BB model
confronted with the formidable problem discussed earlier. Distant
supernovae were found to be farther away than their redshifts suggest. As
highlighted in the graph, above, their actual distance is significantly
greater than what had been predicted. And since prediction is based on the redshift-versus-distance equation, the equation had to be wrong. Faced with the unexpected mismatch between redshift and
distance of their 1a-supernova standard candles, what do you think the
experts did? ... Exactly, a new patch was cooked-up before you could say,
“your expanding-universe premise is wrong, try a new model.” |
3. Standard Cosmology Response
The response of astrophysicists was predictable. Instead of recognizing
that the Universe we live in is cellular and not expanding, they clung to
the expansion-of-the-whole-universe doctrine. Instead of thinking outside
the box and notice an infinity of cosmic bubbles, they reaffirmed their
faith in universal expansion. Instead of adopting the simple and elegant
cellular formulation (as expressed in the upper curve of the graph) and
thereby immediately resolving the crisis; they declared that the expansion
of the universe is accelerating. The universe is supposedly getting bigger
and bigger, faster and faster.
Did the experts ask themselves, is the acceleration
something real? or is it only apparent? ... Maybe they did. Maybe some
concluded that fundamental revisions were needed. And there is no question
of the fact that some of the most brilliant and dedicated minds on Earth
are involved in the quest for understanding. However, meaningful
revisionism is rarely tolerated; the official paradigm rules; whatever the
field of enquiry, this is the way it is. And in the field of cosmology,
proposing a foundational change becomes unappealing to career astro-researchers.
And so, in 1998 astronomers and physicists convinced
themselves that the universe is accelerating. But with acceleration, a new
mystery emerged. In addition to the fundamental question of why the
universe is expanding in the first place, now there is the utterly
baffling mystery of why it is expanding with a vengeance.
|
In other ways this new dark
universe [dark because acceleration leads to dilution which leads
to darkness] is utterly baffling, a road map to new mysteries. Dr.
Marc Davis, a cosmologist at the University of California at Berkeley,
called it ‘a universe chock full of exotics that don’t make sense to
anybody.’
–Dennis Overbye (The New York Times, July 23, 2002) |
|
No doubt, it must be deeply discouraging when the correspondence
between evidence and theory “doesn’t make sense to anybody.”
|
4. The Patch
In the aftermath of the 1998 discovery, as may be well imagined, a host
of big bang variants were proposed and presented in scientific circles.
The cause of acceleration was of foremost concern as well as
reformulating, or adjusting, relevant equations. For the theoretical cause of acceleration, the experts
proposed that the universe was being subjected to a mysterious dark energy
that expands space and causes an increase in the rate of expansion of the
universe. They were not sure if it is the Lambda force (the one that
Einstein introduced into his universe model in 1917) or if it is another
bout of inflation —a re-inflation phase. Some theorists
turned to something called Quintessence —a force
that may be responsible for the apparent exponential growth of the
universe. As for the practical implementation of the patch: it simply
meant re-evaluating an adjustable factor in the BB equation. An important
parameter known as the matter density parameter, Ωo, was given a new value. As I said
earlier there was no fundamental change in the model; notably, the same
equation continued to be used. The original value of Omega, Ωo, was 1.0 (unity), the
new value was anywhere between 0.25 and 0.35. By selecting the appropriate
Omega value, astrophysicists are able to position the curve almost
anywhere they want on a graph of distance (similar to the graph shown
above). By selecting the appropriate Omega
value, the curve representing the BB theory can always be made to agree
with the data. Almost like magic. And so, with the judicious choice of numerical
factors,
the crisis seemingly disappeared. |
5. The Crisis on a Fundamental Level
In practical terms, the BB model is much like the Ptolemaic
model; with the proper adjustment of variables, it all seems to work. The
Ptolemaic model was able to account for the observed motions of the
planets of the Solar system with the help of various geometric
contrivances to modify the predicted orbital trajectories. Similarly, the
BB model is able to account for the apparent "motions" of the observable
universe, all with the help of about 12 parameters, which, according to
astronomer-and-physicist Mark Whittle, “… accurately measure the
properties of the Universe [and] provide a stunning degree of agreement
and coherence.”
[5] Clearly, the Ptolemaic and BB models work well in an
empirical way.
The problem, however, is fundamental. While both models may be
praiseworthy as intricate reflections of appearances, neither model
is a representation of reality. The central error of the Ptolemaic system
is placing the Earth at the center of the universe; and for the BB system
the central error is universal expansion and its extrapolation to
whole-cosmos expansion.
Let us examine the implications for the cosmic distance
formulation.
Here are the key inputs used for the cosmic-redshift method of
determining reception distance under BB rules:
- Z is the redshift index. It is the essential and primary value measured
by astronomers. This is the actual value that varies with distance.
- Ho is the Hubble constant. It is a measure of
the rate of expansion of space itself —a rate applicable to the present
era of the evolving BB universe. Although it is considered a constant, it
varies with location.
- H is the Hubble parameter (not to be confused with the
Hubble constant). It represents the rate of space expansion as a
function of the age of the BB universe. That is, it varies with
evolutionary time.
- Ω, Omega, is the ratio of the average density of the total
mass-and-energy present in the universe compared to the total matter
density required for the universe to achieve a critical balance, a balance
that will just prevent it from collapsing in on itself. In its simplest
form:
Ω =
(Actual density of matter) / (Critical density of matter).
There are a number of problems associated with the Hubble constant;
some relate to the BB others relate to the real Universe.
One is the long-standing problem of determining an accurate
value. Astronomers have come to recognize that the rate of expansion of
space varies in different parts of the universe. With such regional
variation it is hard to pin down a precise "constant" value. In practice,
an estimated average value is used for the BB cosmic distance equation.
A deeper concern with profound implications: If the distance
equation is to include a measure for the expansion of space, it should
also have a measure for the contraction of space. As Einstein well
understood when he referred to "contractile" gravity, the gravitational
effect tends to contract, or shrink, space. If one includes both factors,
a factor for expansion and another for contraction, that is, one to take
care of the space expanded within cosmic voids, the other to take care of
the space contracted in and around the great galaxy clusters (as well as
isolated field galaxies), then one will find a marvelous balance. One will
find that, although space expands (albeit regionally) the universe does
not expand. If, however, the "contraction" effect is not recognized, and
not taken into account, the result must be an out-of-balance expanding
cosmos. Such oversight leads to the prediction of a big-bang-type
universe.
Another serious problem is that the Hubble constant is based on a
flawed interpretation of the cosmic redshift. The traditional
interpretation of the cause of redshift is that distant galaxies are
receding with the space vacuum in which they are embedded. This
produces a Doppler effect on the galactic light that is eventually
received on Earth. It is, according to this interpretation, simply a
measure of the increase of the intervening space (vacuum) between
our galaxy and the distant galaxy. It is usually expressed as the rate
that a distance of 1 million light years, a tiny portion of the total
distance, increases in one second of time. As an example, 1Mly
typically expands by 15 to 20 kilometers per second. The key point is that
the cosmic redshift is taken to be a Doppler effect. The problem is, in
the real Universe, galaxies are not receding; there is no Hubble-based
Doppler effect.
What actually causes the cosmic redshift is a simple
recently-discovered process called velocity-differential
redshifting. It is amazing that in their search among countless varieties
of tired-light mechanisms theorists had somehow overlooked this
particular, rather self-evident, process.[6] Significantly, the
velocity-differential redshift is applicable to both types of cosmic
regions —those where the vacuum is expanding and also where the vacuum is
contracting.
On the cosmic scale of distances the Hubble constant is
irrelevant. Notice, it does not appear in the Cellular universe
cosmic-distance equation:
.
Turning to the Omega parameter, in order to make the distance equation
fit the observations (such as those made by the Supernova Cosmology
Project and the High-Z Supernova Search and reported in 1998), the density
of all matter has to be about 0.30 as a decimal fraction of critical
density (for a balanced expanding universe). What is needed is for Omegao
to be equal to 0.30:
Ωo ≈ (0.30) / (1.0) .
But all the visible and detectable matter of the universe yields a density
that is only about 0.02 as a fraction of critical density. This means that
the balance of the fraction, or 0.28, must consist of some unknown kind of
matter! Its only known characteristic is that of having a gravitational
nature.
,
Ωo ≈ (0.02 + 0.28) /
(1.0) =
0.30 .
To summarize: In order for the “distance” curve to fit the data
properly (see the graph above), Ωo must be about
0.30; but because visible-and-detectable matter only contributes a tiny
0.02 proportion, a large proportional amount of "dark matter" has to be
invented.
There is, however, no evidence, none whatsoever, that this mysterious dark
stuff exists.
Since it serves no useful purpose for an intrinsically cellular universe,
Omega does not appear in the DSSU cosmic-distance formula.
What about the energy of the vacuum? … The term representing the vacuum
energy is included in the denominator, and often explicitly expressed as:
.
In the BB universe, the vacuum energy overwhelmingly dominates. It is
essentially what keeps the BB from collapsing. And herein lies the
simplified explanation for acceleration. As the universe expands there is
ever more space, more vacuum, and more vacuum energy; ΩVACUUM increases.
However, ΩMATTER does not increase; the matter content of the universe
remains constant. Obviously, Ωo gets smaller and smaller; which, in turn,
means the BB distance curve tends higher and higher. The result is,
essentially, a runaway effect —the acceleration effect.
In contrast, the DSSU maintains the vacuum energy in harmonious balance
with all the other forms of energy.
The differences in cosmologies are fundamental; and the
consequences are profound.
|
6. Harmonious Match
The crisis of 1998 may have been a serious blow to BB cosmology, but it
represented a harmonious match between theory and evidence for the DSSU
theory. The decay characteristics of the flash from supernovae revealed
their extraordinary distance —and these distances agree with the DSSU
redshift-versus-distance formulation. As the upper curve in the graph
indicates, what the observers found and what the equation predicts agree
with each other. DSSU theory converts redshift to distance using
underlying principles that are almost totally alien to standard cosmology
and yet it all agrees with corroborating evidence. The theory uses
principles that are outright heretical —if proclaimed in another age they
would herald instant condemnation from BB orthodoxy and excommunication
for the innovator. They are: (1) The universe is not expanding. (2) The
universe is infinite. (3) The universe had no genesis, will have no
doomsday. (4) Notwithstanding the perpetual existence of the universe,
everything, every entity, in (and of) the universe, has a limited term of
existence. There are continuous non-cyclical regeneration processes, thus,
the overall appearance of the universe never changes. These principles
match reality. The crisis of 1998 focuses attention on an uncompromising
fact: the wonderful match between theory and observation is best achieved
when one’s theory holds that the universe is statically cellularly
structured and correspondingly nonexpanding. |
7. Historical Roots of the Crisis
The BB model fails as a scientific theory. It has always been and always
will be merely a hypothesis. Any theory that incorporates the invalid
conclusion of the historic Michelson-Morley (MM) experiment: is either
incomplete or just plain wrong. Einstein’s relativity theories are
classified under the former —they are incomplete and physicists know they
are incomplete. The Big Bang, the Steady State, and all
expansion-of-the-whole-universe theories are classified under the latter
—they are just plain wrong.
The roots of the crisis in cosmology (as well as physics) trace back to
the decade of the 1880s, the decade of the most historic but misunderstood
experiments in physics. Professor Reginald Cahill of Flinders University
in Australia has investigated and reanalyzed those pivotal experiments and
maintains,
|
“... here physics took a wrong
turn, a mistake of ghastly proportions, from which it has yet to
recover.”
[7] |
|
Albert Michelson and Edward Morley had doubted
their own measurements and followed up their doubts by reporting their
failure to detect the Earth’s absolute motion through space—its
motion with respect to the vacuum, or the aether. This
unjustified “null” interpretation was translated into the invalid
conclusion that the aether does not exist. The concept of absolute
space, or equivalently a space medium, was henceforth banished from mainstream physics. A ghastly mistake.
As discussed in greater detail in various articles posted on the
Cellular Universe website, the invalid conclusion of the MM experiment was
incorporated into a number of important theories and many of the models of
the universe that were developed during the decades after the 1880s. Of
interest in the present brief discussion is that the
expansion-of-the-universe model conceived by Willem de Sitter, Alexander Friedmann, and others during the 1920s perpetuated what is probably the
biggest scientific blunder in modern history. In the years that
followed, the fantastical creativity of Georges Lemaître transformed the
simple expanding-universe model into the
expanding-universe-from-an-unstable-speck-of-almost-nothing model —we call
it the Big Bang hypothesis for short. It stands foremost in perpetuating
the blunder.
The roots of the crisis in
the standard model, as the foregoing suggests, are deep indeed.
|
8. Resolution of the Crisis
Any meaningful resolution must necessarily include the following:
First, recognize that our Universe is not accelerating;
it is not even expanding (only regional "space" is expanding). Face
the reality that the Universe is already fully expanded —always has
been and always will be.
Second, accept what has actually been observed (by astute astronomers
like Jaan Einasto and Anthony P. Fairall); accept what has been logically deduced. Accept that
the Universe has a grand scale cellular structure. Our Universe is a cellular
universe.
Third, adopt the DSSU redshift-distance formulation for calculating
significant cosmic distances. The standard redshift-distance equation used
by astronomers (and shown in the graph) simply will not work in a
multi-cellular non-expanding universe. A logarithmic formulation must be
used.
And lastly, understand that the cosmic redshift is caused by
a velocity differential effect acting on light waves as they
propagate in both expanding-vacuum and contracting-vacuum regions of the
cosmos.
Viewing these requisites in the light of a bureaucratic academia
coursing in the opposing direction and having the inertia of a fully
loaded supertanker leads one to conclude that implementing the resolution
to the 1998 crisis constitutes nothing less than a revolution in
astronomy and cosmology. □
|
This article is an open-access article distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2005; rev 2015-5
Copyright © by
Conrad Ranzan
(www.cellularuniverse.org)
References and Notes
- ^ Accelerating Universe Theory Dispels Dark Energy,
Nature, Science Update (July 3, 2003)
- ^ Timothy Ferris, The Whole Shebang, A State-of-the-Universe(s)
Report (Simon & Schuster, N.Y., 1997) p36.
- ^
E. Wright,
www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/age.html
- ^
E. Wright,
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_03.htm
- ^ M. Whittle, Cosmology: The History and
Nature of Our Universe (The Teaching Co., Chantilly, Virginia, 2008)
Lecture 26, Guidebook p141
- ^
C. Ranzan, Cosmic Redshift in the Nonexpanding Cellular Universe:
Velocity-Differential Theory of Cosmic Redshift, American Journal of
Astronomy & Astrophysics Vol.2, No.5, pp47-60 (2014).
Doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20140205.11
| (Abstract
& links) | (Download "Reprint" PDF)
- ^
R.T. Cahill, Space and Gravitation, Magister Botanicus, Vol.2,
pp.13-22 (Jan 2004).
(Posted at:
http://www.mountainman.com.au/process_physics/index_of_papers.htm )
FURTHER READING:
For the background and technical details of high-Z supernova
research go to:
The High-Z SN Search:
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/supernova/HighZ.html
Also: www.supernova.lbl.gov/
For other aspects of the crisis in Conventional
Cosmology see Mysteries and Paradoxes that Plague
Standard Cosmology at
www.CellularUniverse.org/MysteriesParadoxes.htm
For other views check these
links relating to international symposiums focusing on the crisis:
■ 1st
Crisis in Cosmology Conference, CCC-1, (2005). Astronomical
Society of the Pacific Conference CCC-1. Report published in
Progress in Physics, Vol.1,
Issue 3, 2005.
■ Report on the 1st
Crisis in Cosmology Conference CCC-1, (2005) by popular
astronomer/cosmologist Hilton Ratcliffe.
■ 2nd Crisis in Cosmology Conference, CCC-2, (2008): Here is
the link to their posted
Articles/Papers:
Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference CCC-2
Top of page
Back to DSSU Home Page
|
|