
ANNOUNCEMENTS &
NEW ITEMS:
(2019 February 13, 14, & 15): Three days of remembrance and mourning: the
horror and tragedy of the Dresden Holocaust (1945, Feb 1315), the
most devastating single terrorist event in the history of mankind. [
HELLSTORM ]
(2019 January): Regarding the latest DSSU research article: The theoretical
and evidential proof of total masstoenergy conversion was rejected by the
Canadian Journal of Physics. Unable to find errors in the physics or
flaws in the logic, the editor Dr. Michael Steinitz and his anonymous
Associate Editor dismissed the Paper as being too technical in nature and
not being a “topic of high interest for the widest audience of physicists.”
… Who would have guessed? The editors of Canadian Journal of Physics
find basic firstyear university physics too technical!! … Regarding the
other excuse, I politely asked the editors: “Do you seriously believe that
your target audience, mostly physicists and others with an earnest interest
in the physical sciences, would not value this new insight!? Should they not
be made aware of this new knowledge?” No response! … So ends another
FAKE REVIEW. –CR
(2018 December 28): See Press
Release: Unprecedented Unification of
Gravity Theory.
(2018 December 1): Unificationofgravity paper has been accepted for publication.
(2018 November 22): Here we go again! Latest paper rejected.
Reason? “The paper contains too many acronyms …” How many? Hey! It
contains only one wellknown acronym (DSSU)!
Although clearly written and logically presented with an easy to
follow style (text, examples, mathematics, graphics), the Reviewer/Editor
found the article “impenetratable [sic] and therefore impossible to referee
in any detail.” … No examples, no particulars, it was just hopelessly
“impossible to referee.”
The seeking and exposing of errors is the essence of a legitimate
review process. Evidently the Reviewer/Editor failed to find anything that
could be considered demonstrably false, and so, found it necessary to
concoct BS objections (wellknown acronym for bovine excrement). What
happened here was simply a fake review. –CR
(2018 September 27): New research paper on GRAVITY is currently under
review. … Details the unification of all five aspects of gravity …
Presents a remarkable new development in the theoretical nature of gravity
waves. …
(2018 September):
Fan of DSSU comments on the “train wreck”
of modern physics and on big bang mythology.
(2018 September 1): PUBLISHED:
Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme
Energy Particles, Physics Essays
Vol.31, No.3, pp.358376 (2018).
(2018 August): Press Release (2018 August):
"The
mechanism driving astrophysical jets has been discovered"
(2018 July 31): What’s the delay? Yes, the usual publication frustrations:
■ Journal 1: peer reviewed, no errors in the logic, no flaws in the
science, tentative ACCEPTANCE, then REJECTED !
■ Journal 2: peer reviewed, no errors in the logic, no flaws in the
science, REJECTED !
Could it be that the editors promoting fake astroscience feel
threatening by the DSSU revolution? …
■ Journal 3: peer reviewed, “This is a scholarly and erudite
article that deserves to be published in recognition of its tutorial nature
and … the validity of the author’s proposals.” ACCEPTED for publication.
The article —Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme
Energy Particles— is toxic and revolutionary! Details to follow. –CR
(2018 May 24): Two papers are
currently under review. Meanwhile, work has begun on a new research
paper delving deeper into the amazing properties of aether.
(2018 April 28):
Question: What drives astrophysical jets?
What process or mechanism generates the stupendous power of those
spectacular emission jets associated with certain stars? (I’m talking about
gamma photons and neutrinos with energy equivalent to a million hydrogen
atoms!! Imagine that much energy contained in a single gamma photon or
neutrino!)
This has been one of the biggest mysteries of the universe
—one that has baffled the academic cognoscenti for decades.
The answer will be revealed in the next research article,
which is currently under review. And as the followers of DSSU theory
have come to expect, the answer is perfectly natural; the concepts are
straightforward, the arguments logical, the conclusions compelling, the
implications profound.
(2018 February 1): Research paper SachsWolfe Effect Disproof
has been published in in the International Journal of Astrophysics and
Space Science.
Abstract & links.
Reprint
(download PDF).
(2017 December 30) Press release: The
SacksWolfe Effect has now been disproved. … Expansion Cosmology has
lost its last supporting pillar. …
(2017 December 29): Another powerful research paper … another devastating
blow for the Big Bang … the
"SacksWolfe Effect Disproof " has been
accepted for publication in an international journal for astrophysics.
(Details to follow within a few days.)
(2017 December): Comment posted:
Galaxy age
misinterpretation. Does cosmic distant have any relationship to a galaxy’s
age?
(2017 December): 2nd printing of "The Nature of Gravitational Collapse":
(Details)
(2017 November): Special purchase offer on the book "Guide to the
Construction of the Natural Universe": (Mailin Order Form.)
(2017 Sept): Recently brought to my attention: DSSU material appears on The
New Illuminati website accompanied by some amazing graphics.
New Illuminati
–The DSSU is The New Cosmology
New Illuminati –Hidden Substrate of Reality
–History of the Aether Theory
(2017 Sept): "Assorted Comments" added to
QuestionsAnswersComments.
(2017 July): The book The Nature of Gravitational Collapse is
now available.
The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
Subtitle: How the photon, the particle of light, is responsible for mass,
gravity, superneutron stars, and supermassive black holes
—Reveals the truth about stellar and supermassive black holes.
This work contains 311+ pages, 67 illustrations, references, and
index. …
Second printing details (2017 November)
First printing details (Lambert Academic
Publishing).
(2016 December): “So easy to
understand” comment from an Australian engineer.
(2016 November): “LargeScale Structure of the Dynamic Steady
State Universe” now
published in the
American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.6,
2016, pp.6577.
Astract and Links to HTML and PDF.
(2016 June):
Revolutionary research paper:
The Nature of Gravitational
Collapse –published in the
American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.2,
2016, pp.1533.
Abstract and Links:
—Another
major DSSU success, as it reveals amazing new insights! The theory has
uncovered the mechanism by which mass undergoes a total conversion to
energy. Yes, a mass to energy conversion with 100% efficiency! As everything else in the DSSU, it is a
perfectly natural process. Truly amazing!
(2016426): A mathematical cosmologist claims the values of the
Hubbleexpansion parameter and the cosmicbackground temperature are the
most important elements for understanding the real Universe!
Letter and response.
(2016 March): What is the difference between a physical and a
mechanical aether? ...
Be aware of the distinctions among the terms commonly applied to aether:
Terms such as physical, mechanical, subquantum, and dynamic.
Link to new Question & Answer.
The book, Guide to the Construction of the Natural Universe, is now available at the
Niagara Falls Public Library (Victoria branch). If you
live in the Province of Ontario, your local library can request the book
from the Niagara Falls
Public Library.
Participate in a unique exploration of the Cosmos: venture into the
subatomic realm, even into the subquantum realm where the roots of reality
reside, and into the domain of cosmicscale cellstructure and beyond to
infinity. Along the way, discover the cause of mass, the cause of
gravitation, and rediscover Einstein’s “nonponderable” aether and Heraclitus’
harmonyofopposites principle. … The book represents the ultimate
vindication for all the skeptics who resisted the "preposterous" Big Bang
mythology and who refused to join the explodingcosmos religion.
The book contains 317 pages, 61 illustrations, references, and
index …
Available from
CFAR Books.
Or use this
mailin Order Form.
My comments on the 2016 "Official Science"
news story:
Do not be misled by the recent reports of the detection of gravity waves.
What the LIGO apparatus measures is the interference from beams of
selfgenerated electromagnetic waves. It seems highly probable that what
LIGO actually detected was some vibrational “noise” or some unexplained
interference; and NOT gravity waves originating from a distant binary system
(in which two extremely massive black holes are supposedly in the process of
merging). How the data, the wave patterns, are interpreted is subject to
theory and restricted by theory. Naturally the official
interpretation must conform to the Officiallysanctioned theory of gravity
—Einstein’s general theory of relativity. Thus, the light patterns recorded
by LIGO are interpreted via Einstein’s mathematical concept of gravity. The
problem is the generalrelativitygravity interpretation, as is well known,
ignores the space medium!
Have gravity waves really been detected?
Think about this: The academic experts do not have the cause and mechanism
of gravity (Isaac Newton did not, Albert Einstein did not, and today’s
bigbang astrophysicists do not). Their theory of gravity is embarrassingly
incomplete! So, if they do not yet understand the nature of gravity itself,
how then can they claim to be able to recognize the waves that gravity
supposedly emits? The experts cannot even answer the simple question:
Specifically, what is it that is waving? What is waving back and forth?
Here is something else the reports fail to mention: The
gravity waves that are actually detectable are those associated with the
turbulence in the aether flow (the space medium streaming through our Solar
System).
Australian physicist Reginald T. Cahill has been examining these aetherflow
waves for over 15 years. –CR (2016 May)
Updated 2016 June: See Comment #19
Updated 2018 Dec: See Press
Release 2018
(2016 Jan 6) Published:
Olbers’
Paradox Resolved for the Infinite NonExpanding Universe, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
Vol.4, No.1, (2016 January).
Abstract & download links.
Excerpts:
● “The man accredited with discovering universe expansion did not believe
that the universe was expanding. Hubble was convinced that the key evidence,
the cosmic redshift, was caused by some other factor, something more
fundamental than mere expansion.”
● “With the recent discovery of a new cosmicredshift mechanism, and its
theoretical validation, it turns out that Hubble was right.”
● Explains how “an infinite, nonexpanding, perpetually regenerating
universe" is able to predict a dark night sky.
Press Release (2015 Oct 15):
The Big Bang is no longer a viable hypothesis !
(2016 June)
FREE DOWNLOAD:
"DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence",
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, pp.455473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "wellwritten and incisive
article."
(2015Oct 6): Webpage added for article CosmicRedshift Distance Law Without c
Without H: –Comments &
Links– Describes the challenge of getting DSSU papers
published.
(2015 Aug 20): Allow me to extend a sincere "Thank You" for the many
invitations to join social media and professional networks.
Unfortunately I must decline. It’s simply a matter of precious time —there
is just too little of it. All my available time is taken up by research,
writing, and website maintenance —in fact, two more web domains have been
purchased. It is all being done for the purpose of providing the educated
and interested public with the ammunition to refute and replace the utterly
bankrupt bigbang Worldview. (However, not to give the impression of a total
recluse, seclusionist, or misanthrope, I do manage to squeeze in a few
delightful hours of ballroom dancing every week or two.) –CR
(2015 Aug): Brief update on the status of the neutrino and its
adaptation into the DSSU particle theory. See
Section 5 of
the Discussion webpage
for the article: The Fundamental Process of Energy
(2015 Aug): The article
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 1) has been revised.
(2015 July):
Comments and questions from
a 14year old student.
(2013):
Higgs Boson Discovered?
After 50 long years of searching, Physicists claim to have detected the
Higgs boson, the "particle" that ostensibly bestows the property of mass on
all other such particles. Is it now time to celebrate? … Definitely not.
The question now is this: If the Higgs ‘particle’ is the giver
of mass to all other particles, what then gives the Higgs itself its mass?!
(Yes, the newly discovered particle has mass, lots of it!) A difficult and
embarrassing question indeed. It is like asking: If
God created everything, then who, or what, created God?
While physicists think they have solved the mass problem, the
reality is that they have unwittingly exposed an even bigger problem —the
riddle of “First Cause”.
RECENT
RESEARCH PAPERS:
Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme
Energy Particles –Published in Physics Essays
Vol.31, No.3, p358 (2018). (Reprint)

SachsWolfe Effect Disproof –Published in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol.6, No.1, 2018. (
Abstract & Links.)
"The Nature of Gravitational Collapse"
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics. (
Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r^{2}.)

"Olbers’ Paradox Resolved for the Infinite NonExpanding Universe"
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics. (
Abstract & download links.)

"DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence" published
in
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455473 (2015 Dec).
Abstract.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "wellwritten and incisive
article."

Published in the
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics,
AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015:
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies
Local highresolution PDF.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the firstever natural explanation for the cause of the
elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the
absurd concept of wholeuniverse expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and
exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very
same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!

Glossary of Terms
used in Cosmology and Astrophysics with particular emphasis on DSSU theory.
(Opens in separate Window or Tab)

GENERAL INTEREST ARTICLES:
Mysteries & Paradoxes that Plague Standard Cosmology
(Updated 20157)
Cosmology Crisis of 1998 (Revised 20155)
Critique of Conventional Cosmology ...
comments relating to the 'preposterous' expandinguniverse paradigm.
Bafflement
—the remarkable admission of a physicist.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
—During the 20th century there was a decadeslong debate: The cataclysmic
expanding universe VS the stable expanding universe. But there has never
been a debate of the dynamic expanding universe VS the dynamic
nonexpanding universe. (Posted
2011 Oct)
Models of the Universe
—Historical, Expanding, and Cellular universes. INCLUDES A USEFUL TABLE FOR
COMPARING THEORIES.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 1)
—overcoming a "central" problem of cosmology theories.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 2)
—an explanation of how the universe can always have existed and will always
exist.
DSSU, The
NonExpanding Universe: Structure, Redshift, Distance
—A long soughtafter goal of astrophysicists has been a formulation of cosmic distance that is
independent of the speed of light. The goal has now been achieved. The
present Paper details the surprisingly simple distance expression and its
validating agreement with Supernova data.
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force.
(Posted April, 2011)
Gravity and Lambda —A Story of Opposites
(.htm) —A story of opposites in harmony. Key differences between the Conventional
Cosmology and the New Cosmology are presented.
Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the selfsustaining, selfbalancing system.
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Questions & Answers & Comments

COSMOLOGY ARTICLES, etc:
(2016 June) FREE DOWNLOAD details:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "wellwritten and incisive
article."
The Dynamic Steady State Universe.
This work brings together the main pieces of the cosmic
puzzle in a stepbystep construction of the Natural Universe.
Published in Physics
Essays Vol.27 No.2 (2014 June issue) (PDF download) "... the arguments
are wellmade. The article is competent, enjoyable and readable." —Reviewer
for Physics Essays Journal
Revolutionary:
Olbers’
Paradox Resolved for the Infinite NonExpanding Universe, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
Vol.4, No.1, (2016 January).
Abstract & download links.
Excerpts:
● “The man accredited with discovering universe expansion did not believe
that the universe was expanding. Hubble was convinced that the key evidence,
the cosmic redshift, was caused by some other factor, something more
fundamental than mere expansion.”
● “With the recent discovery of a new cosmicredshift mechanism, and its
theoretical validation, it turns out that Hubble was right.”
Cosmic Redshift in the Nonexpanding Cellular Universe (
Journal links
) —details the actual causal mechanism. Published in the
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol.2, No.5 (2014)
Abstract.
Local copy with quality images: (Reprint pdf).
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Entirely new concept for cosmic redshift mechanism;
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology;
• But does not require wholeuniverse expansion;
• A redshift based on the DSSU theory of unified gravity & cosmic cellular
structure;
• Remarkable agreement with independently established redshift distances.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
What historians call "the greatest cosmological debate in
history” was between TWO expanding universes —two
hypothetical models that share the same, I repeat, the same
foundational property! If one is to claim some great clash of ideas (let
alone the "greatest") then surely there must exist some deep dividing
difference! (Posted 2011 Oct)
The Case for a Cellular Universe
—the Story of a Baffling Omission in Modern Cosmology (Revised 2015)
LargeScale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe published in
the American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.6,
2016, pp.6577.
Astract and Links.
Highlights:
■ Presents the first 2 of the 4 main postulates that define the DSSU.
■ Spacemedium expansion and contraction are perpetually held in balance,
thus ensuring a nonexpanding universe.
■ Explains how the two dynamic processes of the DSSU’s space medium sustain
the cellular structure responsible for the pattern of matter distribution in
our Universe.
CosmicRedshift Distance Law Without c
Without H –Comments &
Links– Simplifying the redshiftdistance formula by removing the
speedoflight constant and the Hubble parameter —while maintaining
agreement with observational evidence.

DSSU Theory:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "wellwritten and incisive
article."
Theoretical
Foundation and Pillars of the DSSU (Introduction) —This
introductory essay gives a thematic tour of historical and modern universes
culminating with the Natural Universe.
Currently undergoing revision and updating: Theoretical Foundation and Pillars of the Dynamic Steady State Universe
(pdf) —The first complete presentation of all four
postulates of DSSU theory. A powerful paper that resolves the
causeofcauses paradox, explains the nonindependent nature of time, and
reveals the 'supreme advantage'. It includes a concise comparison with
standard cosmology focusing on realworld viability.
Supplementary Discussion: The
Primary Process
The Fundamental Process of Energy —A Qualitative Unification of
Energy, Mass, and Gravity. (Abstract
& Reviews & Links) … This article reveals
the secret behind photon confinement. (Contains only a bare minimum of mathematics
and mainly in one of the 14 sections.)
PART 1 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #113 (Jan/Feb 2014)
PART 2 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #114 (Mar/Apr 2014)
Headlined as:
A "Conceptual Unification of Energy, Mass and Gravity"
Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the selfsustaining, selfbalancing system.
Unified Gravitation Cells
of the DSSU —Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells
Space Flow
Equations and ExpansionContraction Rates (pdf) —This paper
explores the mathematical aspects of the two space postulates of DSSU
theory —and uncovers some profound consequences.

ARTICLES on AETHER:
Documentary
movie footage in which Einstein states, "There exists an aether"
—High
resolution .mpg video.
—Low
resolution .wmv video.
The
Aether Experiments and the Impact on Cosmology
—The aether has been detected at least 6 times in recent history. Its most
recent "rediscovery", in 2001, led to the longsought causal mechanism of
gravity —a discovery which, in turn, is revolutionizing cosmology.
MichelsonMorley and the
Story of the Aether Theory —Richard Milton's analysis of the
historical details involving the misrepresentation, bias, and coverup that
hampered the Aether theory.
The History of the Aether Theory
—The historic development of the
aether as a scientific theory of space itself. What started as the "fifth
element" of Antiquity becomes molded by theoretical constraints and
experimental evidence into the dualdynamic subquantum medium —the Essence of the Universe.
(Updated
20162)
Relativity of
Time in the AetherSpace of the DSSU —How intrinsic time and relative time are related.
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to AetherSpace —Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
The Physical Nature of Length Contraction
—the DSSU Theory of Length Contraction Induced by Absolute Motion.
An easy to follow examination of how the mode by which matter is “conducted”
through luminiferous aether causes the matter to contract. A simple
derivation of the mathematical expression for this physical phenomenon is
presented. There is also a brief discussion of relevant historical aspects
and of nonphysical length contraction.
Reviewer's comments:
“This is amazing …” “The paper is interesting …” –Applied Physics
Research reviewer. Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.1
(2013
Feb).
Contradiction Divides Two Aether Theories
—An exploration into the three parts of the speedoflight postulate.
Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays Journal
(Vol 24, No.3, Sept, 2011)
...
ABSTRACT
Basiclevel mathematical and graphical exploration of dynamic aether flow:
PDF
Here is an external webpage with an extensive list of
research papers on the aetherdrift experiments, and the larger question of energy in space.

DSSU RESEARCH PAPERS:
SachsWolfe Effect Disproof (published in in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science Vol.6, No.1, 2018.)
Abstract & links.
DSSU Cosmic RedshiftDistance Relation (htm)
—Converting the cosmic redshift into distance for our Cellular Universe using
a simple and elegant equation.
Large Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe (pdf)
How a dualdynamic space medium sustains the cellular structure (published in AJAA in 2016).
—Presents the postulates and implications of regional spacemedium expansion and contraction.
CosmicScale Structural Features Explained (pdf)
(Chapter 2 of original DSSU Manuscript)
—The Spacing of Clusters
—Sheets of Galaxies
—Supernodes
—Rightangled Walls of Galaxies.
The Cosmic Background Radiation in the DSSU
—The natural explanation of the microwave background radiation applicable to
the natural Cellular Universe.
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies,
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics,
AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Local
highresolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA
here.

GRAVITY:
The Nature of
Gravity –How One Factor Unifies Gravity’s Convergent, Divergent, Vortex, and
Wave Effects
–Published in International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science
(IJASS),
Vol.6, No.5, 2018, pp.7392. (Abstract and Links.)
The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics Vol.4,
No.2, 2016, pp.1533. (Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r^{2}.)
The Processes of Gravitation –The Cause and Mechanism of Gravitation by
C. Ranzan –A revolutionary paper on gravity published in the Journal of
Modern Physics and Applications Vol.2014:3
(2014).
( Abstract & Reviews & Links.
Includes link to hiresolution PDF) "Revolutionary".
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force. (Rev 20119)
First ever, journalpublished paper featuring the DSSU:
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
–Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol 23, No1, p7587 (2010 Mar).
ABSTRACT
This is the cure for the fallacious belief in cosmicscale Dark Matter.
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
(Color version) –Ranzan
Considered "an excellent contribution to the [PE journal]" professional reviewer.
Unified Gravitation Cells of the DSSU
—Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells

RELATIVITY ARTICLES:
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
(●Abstract ●Links ●Excerpts ●Extras)
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Einstein’s Simple Mathematical Trick –and the Illusion of a Constant Speed
of Light
(Abridged version with links to Journalpublished version. Posted July 2013)
Extended Relativity –Exploiting the Loopholes in Einstein's Relativity.
A Logical extension of special relativity. Reprinted by permission of
PEP,
from
Physics Essays Vol.25, No.3 (2012 Sept).
— Abstract & Links & Reviews —
The Three Components of the SpeedofLight Postulate.
Published in Physics Essays journal Vol.26,No.1 (2013 March)
Local copy:
The
Three Components of the SpeedofLight Postulate (pdf):
Absolute vs relative. Variance vs invariance. Another instance of the Heraclitian
"Harmony of Opposites." (Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol.26, No.1,
2013).
Relativity of Time in the Aether
Medium of the DSSU
—Absolute Motion and Intrinsic Time
Resolving a Paradox in Special Relativity –Absolute Motion and the Unified Doppler Equation.
(Posted 2011, July). Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.4, p594 (2010).
ABSTRACT
How DSSU Relativity Resolves the Speed Paradox (Introductory Discussion)
—Absolute Motion Resolves a (speed) Paradox in Einstein’s Special Relativity.
(Supplementary Discussion)
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to AetherSpace
(Posted 2011, July). Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 1)
—Response to a reviewer critical of DSSU aetherspace relativity
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 2)
—How to convert abstractspace equations into aetherspace equations
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy
Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.2
(2013 May).
LOCAL COPY:
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy —distinguishing
between the apparent energy and the real energy of moving mass.

An Open Letter to the Scientific Community
(Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of
hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed inflation, dark
matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there
would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers
and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics
would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a
way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the
least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.
..."
continues
...
A devastating Declaration of opposition to Big Bang cosmology
signed by more than 400 Researchers.
For the full text click on:
CosmologyStatement.org
or alternate
site.

INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM:
This website is mainly concerned with revisionism in cosmology. Those of us
involved in replacing the unnatural expandinguniverse paradigm are aware of
the difficulties involved.
However,
other revisionists have unimaginable difficulties. Consider the ongoing
persecution of revisionists in other fields of intellectual pursuit:
"It makes you wonder —about the immense effort being made
by State and Statesponsored organizations with budgets of tens of millions
of dollars and thousands of employees and associates to smother and punish
these few men and women. Every punishing instrument imaginable is used,
every vicious slander conceivable, every flagrant and pervasive form of
censorship that law allows, including the imprisonment of simple writers for
thought crimes against the State. ... Makes you wonder." —Bradley R. Smith (2011)
"Discussing truth is so controversial, so dangerous … In most of the world it is simply illegal.”
–
Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, Veterans Today (2011)
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who
speak it." –George Orwell

DEDICATION: This website is solemnly dedicated to those
individuals who have conducted research in their chosen field and have
informed others of their inquiries and suffered the consequences when
subpoenaed by the Inquisition or some variant thereof. The dedication
extends to those individuals currently imprisoned, and those facing
trial and persecution simply for exercising their basic human right of
freedom of expression supposedly granted to them under the UN Charter of
Human Rights.
"Every
year, hundreds of writers and other literary professionals around the world
are imprisoned, prosecuted, persecuted, attacked, threatened, forced into
exile or even murdered as a result of their work."
ALSO: Be aware of the continuing threat to our precious freedom of expression on the
Internet. The threat is serious and relentless. It is described as “… the formal effort to mimic Communist China’s
system of Internet censorship.” See
The Secret Behind SOPA
(2012Jan).
Update.
More information on threats to internet freedom: https://battleforthenet.com/
Reporterjournalist
Arthur Topham, Canadian victim of the Inquisition,
arrested (2012) for posting his research.
“Arthur Topham faces prison time for daring to speak his mind on his own website, as he
faces criminal charges under Canada’s hate crimes legislation contained in
Section 318  320 of the criminal code.” –Rights and Freedoms Bulletin Issue
No. 204 Feb 7, 2015.
VERDICT: Arthur Topham found “guilty” AND “not guilty” of hate speech
by a braindead jury!
–Dr. James Sears, reporting in “The world’s
Largest AntiMarxist Publication” (Issue 2015 December,
http://www.yourwardnews.com/backissues.html)
2016 Update: Panel
Discussion on The Trial of Arthur Topham
Freespeech crusader Bill Whatcott defies British Colombia
Human Rights Tribunal efforts to impose gender language tyranny.
“I have no intention on wasting money on a lawyer for the Morgane Oger vs
Bill Whatcott case, as human rights tribunals are kangaroo courts and the
odds of … getting justice in these biased tribunals is next to zero.” –2017
June (www.freenorthamerica.ca
…)
End of free speech in Britain:
A hostile jury, by a hasty unanimous
verdict, decided that Nationalist Leader Jez Turner deserves to be sent to
jail for his critical views! Report (2018515).
British Maverick Psychologist
jailed for publishing his research. … “The ambivalence of librarians
getting writers imprisoned quite defies comprehension.” –Simon Sheppard
(2013)
The repression of free speech in Canada has degenerated to the point where …
■ Freedom advocates, such as Marc Lemire, are censured for merely expressing
their reasoned opinions. Freedomsite, whose motto is “Fighting
for freedom against the censorship enforcers”, documents the official
persecution.
■ A tenured professor has lost his position for revealing his research and
views on history. This is unprecedented. Professor Anthony J. Hall at the
University of Lethbridge, Alberta, has been suspended (2016 October 5)
without pay.
“… Any thinking person should recognize that there is something deeply wrong
when a history professor is persecuted for saying we should be able to
examine our history.” –Monika Schaefer 2017
■ A publisher/editor, for expressing his realitybased views, has been
denied postal services. Dr. James Sears, publisher and editor of
Your Ward News was
stripped of Canada Post Mail Service by government order (2016 June).
■ A violin teacher and truth revealer, Monika Schaefer, for posting a
video (an apology to her dead mother), has been attacked by various
socalled community leaders.
“The treatment of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free
and democratic society.” –The American Herald Tribune, 2016 Sept
■ American
Speaker Arrested in Canada for the textual material on his iPad
—2017 June 24
While the invasion continues, the “guardians” of the nation are busy
suppressing the freedom of expression: going after deemed violations in what
people think and write and say.
■
Canada Claims Authority to Censor Your Internet Searches –Reason
magazine ■ The "justice"
system is being used to suppress opinions: In a legal battle (2018) for freedom of speech in Canada
... the
prosecution and silencing of Dr. James Sears expected to cost taxpayers $20 million!
“I estimate the Board of Review, police investigating and
Crown prosecuting us on criminal matters, will cost the taxpayers over $20
million, assuming no appeals past 2018 (murderers & rapists will walk free
as huge blocks of court time bump their cases, causing them to be thrown
out).”
–Dr. James Sears, Your Ward News, Fall, 2018, p17
Updates are posted at
www.yourwardnews.ca
The Continuing Struggle for Freedom
A ray of hope in the ongoing struggle for freedom. Populist and nationalist
movements around the world are gaining ascendancy over the New World Order’s
effort to establish global governance and impose tyrannical control over
every last square meter of the Earth’s surface. –The Barnes Review
Vol.23 No.1 (2017 Jan p70)
"This
Is Very Serious" –S. Molyneux, 20187
(7minute
video on the importance of freedom of speech)
In repressive Germany:
Ursula Haverbeck,
89, Sentenced to 14 Months in Jail for Heresy! –2017 November
This amazing 89yearold woman continues advocating under the dictum: "Only
the truth will set you free”.
Mrs. Haverbeck, along with her late husband, founded the education facility
Collegium Humanum in 1963, but which was banned by the Marxist thought police in
2008.
UPDATE (2018516): Ursula Haverbeck will celebrate her 90th birthday in a
German prison
cell. The sprightly grandmother is now serving a
twoyear prison term without parole merely for stating a sincerely
held opinion that is supported by acclaimed academics worldwide!!
“Frau Haverbeck is now sentenced to two years in prison, merely for her
peaceful historical research” –The Barnes Review Vol.24, No.5
(Sept/Oct 2018) p71
INFO on Monika Schaefer's case: https://wirsindmonika.com/
For expressing her opinion on historical events, Canadian citizen
Monika Schaefer has been arrested and imprisoned
(201813) in Germany. She had committed no crime. Author Mike Walsh warns
potential visitors to Germany to stay away from this dangerous police state.
–Merkel
Madness Grips Germany, (201817)
... Found guilty and sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment (time
served); her brother Alfred was sentenced to 38 months!! –(2018
November)
For more on Freedom (and Objectivism),
visit:
Freedomain Radio (www.freedomainradio.com)
presented by Stefan Molyneux.
Just Right Media (www.justrightmedia.org)

... about the author ...
© Copyright 20052019 by
Conrad Ranzan & DSSU Research
All Rights Reserved
For information regarding permission to reproduce selected material herein, please contact:
D S S U Research
Niagara Falls, Canada
18th year on the Internet.
Most recent update:
2019 Feb 12
Visits since mid2010 :
2019212 
 
Einstein’s Simple Mathematical Trick
–and the Illusion of a Constant Speed of Light
Conrad Ranzan
2011
Abridged version of an article published in
Applied Physics Research Vol.5, No.4, 2013
(websites: www.ccsenet.org/apr &
www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/apr/issue/view/852 )

As Einstein regarded the situation, the [aether] experiments, seemed
to indicate a "conspiracy" on the part of nature against man's efforts
to obtain knowledge of the physical world, –Science writer Lillian R. Lieber (1945) 

1. Introduction
In the real world aether exists and serves as the
conducting medium of light waves.
Pay no attention to the contrary assertion in your high
school and college texts which invariably state that there is no such thing as
aether. The aether is described as just an old discarded concept; strictly 19^{th}century voodoo science. Do, however, pay attention to what is written in the
research articles of the various physics journals. It is now commonly accepted
that the Universe is permeated by aether (a generic term for the space medium).
While the existence of aether is not at issue, the properties of aether are
subject to considerable debate.
Also understand that most professionals are embarrassed to actually use the term
“aether” with its negative historical connotations. They prefer to use more exotic terms
such as quantum foam, cosmic substratum, dynamic threespace, background
substructure, and others. … Can’t really blame them. It is entirely understandable.
Imagine having to acknowledge that you had it all wrong; and that your
profession had it wrong for almost 100 years! This is embarrassing to say
the least.

2. Basic Motion
The most fundamental equation of motion is
(distance traveled) = (speed) ×
(interval of time).
And when rearranged,
(interval of time) = (distance) ÷
(speed), or
.
(21)
Consider an airplane making a twoway crossing of
a lake on a windy day.
(See Fig. 1.) The timeoftravel going
with the wind will
obviously be shorter than the travel time for the crossing going
against the wind. It is simply because the plane is flying with a
constant speed with respect to the air, but the air itself is moving
with respect to the Earth’s surface, including the lake.




Fig. 1. In the presence of the atmospheric wind, the
plane's flight time going from A to B is less than the time
going from B to A. (υ_{p
}is the airspeed of the plane.) 

During the outbound crossing the speed is, in our
example, (u_{PLANE}
+ u_{AIR}). And, during
the return flight, assuming the wind has not changed, the speed must be
(u_{PLANE} −
u_{AIR}). Here
u_{PLANE} is the plane’s speed with respect to the
surrounding air. (And
u_{AIR}
is the atmospheric wind with respect to the Earth reference frame.)
All you need to understand is that the plane moves
at some FIXED speed through the air, while the air itself also moves
(as “wind”).
Here are the equations of motion for the flights
between runways A and B (as labeled in
Fig. 1):
.
(22)
Simple enough. Anyway, the propagation of light
waves through the aether works in the same way. … Yes, I know what you
were taught; but just follow along with me.
Light waves pass through the aether —that is, they
are conducted by the aether— with a fixed speed of about
300,000 kilometers per second. In shorthand, c = 300,000 km/s.
(Note that symbol “c” is not a variable, it represents a
constant of Nature.) Meanwhile the aether itself may be in motion —a
motion historically called the aether wind.
We now consider a light pulse beaming outward
across the lake, and then being reflected back to the starting point.
We have a lightspeed round trip from A to B, then back across to
A. See Fig. 2.




Fig. 2. As a consequence of the "aether wind", the
travel time of the light pulse going from A to B is less than the time
going from B to A. 

Obviously the two time intervals will be
different:
.
(23)
This means that the speed of the light pulse is
not the same for the two directions. Speed (c + u_{a})
is not the same as speed (c – u_{a}).
Now here comes the good part. I will show how
Einstein makes the speed of light the same (constant) for both
directions. Then later, I will detail how Nature actually makes it
appear that the speed of light is constant!

3. How Einstein Achieves the Illusion of Lightspeed INVARIANCE
Einstein uses a simple procedure to make the speed of light constant.
First he deems the two travel times to be identical. That’s right, as if by magic.
In his own words:

“… we establish by definition that
the “time” required by light to travel from A to B equals the “time”
it requires the light to travel from B to A.”
–(From
Einstein’s famous 1905 paper, page 40) 
He simply declares, (∆time_{A to B }) = (∆time_{B to A} ).
Which is the same as
declaring:
. (31)
Essentially, this
makes u_{a} equal to
zero. (Just solve the equation for u_{a}
and you will find that u_{a} = 0.)
It is in the application of his definition that Einstein disconnects
from the real world and makes any speed with respect to aether equal to
zero! (In effect, he declares aether to be nonexistent!)
Now comes the math
part of the illusion. Einstein has a core definition for the
fundamentally important concepts of time interval and simultaneity. See
the adjacent textbox.
And Einstein uses it
in the simple mathematical trick to achieve the illusion of a constant
speed of light:
From his core
definition of time interval and simultaneity, a pulse’s travel time
from A to B is,


Einstein’s Core Definition and Averaging Procedure
Einstein recognized that, in a
discussion at this fundamental level, the intuitive notion of time
intervals (say, between events at different places) is inadequate. And
so, he devised an operational definition of simultaneity and
timeinterval at different places as follows: Suppose timeintervals at
different points (points A and B) of a
given coordinate system are measured by clocks of similar construction;
we may then synchronize these clocks by means of light signals. A
emits a light ray at time t_{A} by A’s clock, it
is received and reflected by B at time t_{B} by
B’s clock, and returns to A at t′_{A} by
A’s clock. Then B’s time t_{B} is
defined to be simultaneous with A’s time ½(t′_{A}
+ t_{A}).” ^{[1]}
Essentially, this
says a light pulse’s travel time ∆t_{AB} , from A
to B, is:
∆t_{AB}
= ½ (∆time_{A to B } + ∆time_{B to A} );
And, similarly
∆t_{BA}
= ½ (∆time_{B to A} + ∆time_{A to B} ).
This is deviously
clever: ∆t_{AB} is made equal to ∆t_{BA}
—even for cases when ∆time_{A to B} does NOT equal ∆time_{B to A}
!! Check it for yourself. Try it with some test values. It's
foolproof !

Time A to B = ½ (∆time_{A to B }
+ ∆time_{B to A} ). (32)
But from the basic
motion equation (see above) a pulse’s travel time is
. (33)
Therefore, combining
(32) and
(33)
(Distance) ÷ (pulse speed) = ½ (∆t_{A
to B} + ∆t_{B to A }) .
(34)
Substituting
expressions (for ∆t_{A to B} and ∆t_{B to A})_{
}from (23)
.
Apply Einstein’s definition —the one that makes
u_{a}
equal to zero, and:
,
Which simplifies to
pulse speed = c .
The same argument, of course, applies to the travel time in the opposite direction, from B
to A. And so regardless of the magnitude of the aether wind, the
observed speed of light should always be c.
This remarkable mathematical illusion became enshrined in Einstein’s second postulate,
making the speed of light invariant for any nonaccelerating observer.
But what about the real world?

4. How Nature Achieves the Illusion of
Lightspeed Invariance
In the real world ∆t_{AB} does not
equal ∆t_{BA} ! And yet amazingly the speed of a light pulse
still appears to be invariant!
Brace yourself for some real magic. As for the
mathematics, I promise nothing more complicated than basic algebra.
We again start with the basic equation of motion
.
The “measured speed” that we are interested in is
the apparent speed of the light pulse:
. (41)
Consider the setup shown in
Fig. 3. Ignore the impracticality of
trying to use a stopwatch to time the roundtrip motion of a light
pulse; simply focus on the equation for the apparent speed of light
and the two effects that influence it.




Fig. 3. Method for measuring the speed of light. We
already know that the speed of the light pulse is constant c with
respect to aether. But what is the measured (the apparent)
speed of the light pulse? 

Now if we are not careful here we might be tempted
to replace ∆t with the sum of the two expressions from
eqn (23). But we would get the
wrong answer —meaning disagreement with actual experimental results.
The reality is that we must take into
consideration the affect that the aether wind has on the rigid platform
and on the clock.
The pulse being measured has an absolute speed
c with respect to aether. The speed
u_{a}
is the flow of the aether itself (this is the same as saying that the
apparatus frame, in Fig. 3, is moving
through the aether with absolute speed
u_{a}).
Now, to be consistent, objectlength D and clocktime
Dt must likewise be
expressed in terms of their motion through aether. In
other words, they must be expressed in their aetheraltered form.
To be consistent with “absolute” c and
“absolute”
u_{a},
everything on the equation’s right side, the apparent length
and apparent timeinterval, must be converted into intrinsic
terms. This means that both length contraction and clock
slowing must be taken into account. 

The problem of measuring the motioninduced contraction of rigid
objects: The problem is that the length of objects (such as that of
the platform in Fig. 3) is not
something that can be measured directly. If one attempts a carpenter’s
method of using a standardized meter stick, one would find that the
particular length being checked will always measure the same value
—regardless of motion: the numeric value will be the same whether
performed while at absolute rest with respect to the aether or while
moving at some significant fraction of the speed of light. Keep in mind
there is NO Einsteinean relative motion here; the
carpenterexperimenter, the meterstick, and the apparatusplatform are
all moving together.
Incidentally, only object dimensions in the
direction of motion are actually contracted and NOT spatial
lengths.^{[2]}
If one wants to know the actual contracted length,
one must do the calculation.
The formula is^{
[3]}
D_{contracted} = D_{apparent} / γ ,
D_{app} = D_{con}
γ
. (42)

The conversion expression we need for length is (from textbox,
above)
D_{app} = D_{con}
γ .
(42)
Where g
is the gamma factor, g = 1 / (1− u_{a}^{2}/c^{2} )^{1/2},
also known as the Lorentz factor.
In the form 1/g it is known as
the contraction factor. Notice that it contains the aetherreferenced speed
u_{a}.
For the derivation, see The Physical Nature of Length Contraction.^{[4]} What is quite interesting, and not well known, is
that clock slowing (due to absolute motion) is caused by length
contraction (see textbox, below) and
for this reason the gamma factor also appears in the timeinterval
conversion.
And the conversion expression ^{
[5]} we need for time is
Dt_{real} = γ
Dt_{app.slow}
, or
Dt_{app.slow} = Dt_{real} /γ
. (43)
(The “apparent slow” time is always less than, or
equal to, the “real” absoluterest time. Note that
γ is always greater than, or
equal to, one. But don’t worry about
γ,
it cancels out in the end.) Next, we apply the conversions
(42) and
(43) to expression
(41), now properly subscripted,
(44)
. (45)
The real roundtrip time, when expressed
with the real velocities shown in Fig. 3,
is,
,
. (46)
Which then allows eqn
(45) to be simplified to:
. (47)
The apparent speed of light equals c
which is a constant (and has the wellknown value of about
300,000 km/s).
Thus, it is the contraction of object length and
the slowing of clocks that gives us the remarkable illusion of the
constancy of the speed of light under the conditions just described.
The illusion depends entirely on length contraction:
The illusion
depends on the aether wind via the lengthcontraction factor. But what
about the time measured by the clock(s), you ask? . . . It turns out
that the slowing of clocks is the direct result of length contraction
within the components of the particular clock —no matter what
components are involved (even the atomicscale parts of atomic clocks,
even biotissue of a beating heart). *
Thus, the illusion of the constant speed of light
(in our example of nonrelative motion, with everything being in the
same reference frame) is caused solely by the real phenomenon of length
contraction.
* There is one exception whereby it
is possible to have a clock that “slows” without invoking length
contraction: a socalled lightclock in which the light pulses travel
perpendicular to the direction of motion. No length contraction
is involved. Nevertheless, the “ticking” rate will agree perfectly with
an identical lightclock oriented so that the path of the lightpulses
is aligned with the direction of motion.


For an alternate and more technical proof of the
“remarkable illusion” of invariance, the reader may wish to check into
Professor Stephan Gift’s article in Physics Essays.^{[6]}
So, what then is the secret behind the magic of
this illusion? …Well, the illusion only works when a twoway lightpath
method is used. Note, however, that the twoway lightpath method is
not always obvious. Imagine, for example, a oneway lightpath
setup. The light pulse is timed from the moment it departs from
distant point B to the splitsecond instant it is received by
the observer at A. For this to work the clocks at A and
B must obviously be synchronized. And there’s the catch. You
see, in order to synchronize those clocks, one has to follow Einstein’s
defined procedure (see textbox, above,
Einstein’s Averaging Procedure). And doing so requires a twoway
lightpath method. There really is no other way. It’s a catch 22,
if you will.
The result is a builtin, cleverly hidden,
synchronization error; and the illusion of invariance still holds. It
still fools the audience.
But in the real world …

5. In the Real World
The astute reader, at
this point, might claim that the above analysis of
Fig. 3 could also be interpreted as proof that Einstein was
right; that u_{a}
equals zero, or even that there is no aether and no aether wind.
But no, that
interpretation is not an option. It is not an option because the
oneway speed of light has been shown, by actual experiments, to be
VARIANT. That is, the propagation speed of the pulse from A to
B is NOT the same as the speed from B to A.
This difference can
only arise in the presence of a lightconducting aether which is
in motion!
In the real world the actual oneway
speed of light
is not constant.
Notwithstanding the
observable illusion described in the previous section, the real world
speed of light is not invariant. In the real world the actual
oneway speed of light VARIES with the aether wind!
Here is a selection
of the experimental evidence and supporting theory. The experiments
detailed by the various authors somehow manage to
overcome Einstein’s clocksynchronization problem which usually
contaminates oneway lightspeed measurements. ^{
[7]} ^{
[8]} ^{
[9]} ^{
[10]} ^{
[11]} ^{
[12]} ^{
[13]} ^{
[14]}
One such experiment, the Marinov (1974, 1977a, 1980b) coupledmirrors
experiment, has been described as “one of the most brilliant and
ingenious experiments of all time. It measures the very small quantity
u/c,
where u
is the absolute velocity of the observer, by using very clever
stratagems.” The coupledmirrors experiment demonstrated that the
absolute velocity of the solar system is of the order of 300 ±20 km/sec,
and that the speed of light is c − u
in the direction of motion of the solar system, and c + u
in the opposite direction. ^{[15]}

6. Conclusion
Whether you are a
student or a teacher or a researcher, pay close attention.
Here’s the bottom
line: Your text books are wrong. The glaring factual error in most
textbooks is the claim, “It is impossible to detect our motion relative
to the aether.” Also in error is the claim that the famous
MichelsonMorley experiment had a “null result”. The truth is, Albert
Michelson and Edward Morley back in 1887 did measure an aether wind —it was merely
less than had been expected. They had simply failed to take into
account the physical length contraction of their apparatus, (a
phenomenon of which they were unaware at the time).
The fact is, lightspeed invariance is
merely an illusion. The illusion depends on the measuring method.
What you need to know
is that the ONEWAY speed of light has long been proven to be nonconstant. (References: [7] to [15] )
The oneway speed of
light is not what Einstein’s postulate says it is.
* * * * 
LINKS to the fulllength printable research paper (which
addresses the question of How Nature Achieves the Illusion Even Without
Rigidplatform Lengthcontraction, when there is no length contraction
between measuring point A and reflection point B):
Journal
published:
C. Ranzan, Einstein’s Simple Mathematical Trick –and the Illusion
of a Constant Speed of Light,
Applied Physics Research Vol.5,
No.4, p85, (2013 Aug); Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/apr.v5n4p85
(Download PDF)
References and Notes
 ^ Mary B. Hesse, Forces and Fields (a study of action at a
distance in the history of physics) (Littlefield, Adams & Co., Totown,
New Jersey, 1965) p231
 ^ Joseph Lévy, From
Galileo to Lorentz... and Beyond, Principles of a Fundamental Theory of
Space and Time (Published by C. Roy Keys Inc., Montreal, Canada,
2003) “It should be pointed out that according to the Lorentz
assumptions, it is matter that is contracted, not space.” –Lévy p41
 ^ C. Ranzan, DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz
Transformations Applied to AetherSpace. Physics Essays Vol.23,
No.3, p520 (2010)
Posted at: http://www.CellularUniverse.org/
 ^ C. Ranzan, The Physical Nature of Length
Contraction –the DSSU Theory of Length Contraction Induced by Absolute Motion. (2012)
Posted at: http://www.CellularUniverse.org/
 ^ C. Ranzan, DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz
Transformations Applied to AetherSpace. Physics Essays Vol.23,
No.3, p520 (2010)
Posted at: http://www.CellularUniverse.org/
 ^ S.J.G. Gift, Light Speed Invariance is a Remarkable Illusion,
Physics Essays Vol.23, 1, 2010
 ^ F. Selleri, Noninvariant oneway velocity of light,
Found. Phys 26, 641664, 1996. Posted at:
http://www.ba.infn.it/~selleri/
 ^ S.J.G. Gift,
OneWay Light Speed Determination Using the Range
Measurement Equation of the GPS.
Posted at: http://vixra.org/pdf/1008.0035v1.pdf
 ^ S.J.G. Gift, OneWay Light Speed Measurement Using the
Synchronized Clocks of the Global Positioning System (GPS),
Physics Essays, Vol.23, No.2, pp271275, June 2010
 ^ S.J.G. Gift, Light Speed Invariance is a Remarkable Illusion,
Physics Essays Vol.23, 1, 2010
 ^ S.J.G. Gift, Doppler Shift Reveals Light Speed Variation,
Apeiron, Vol.17, 13, 2010
 ^ S.J.G. Gift, The Relative Motion of the Earth
and the Ether Detected, Journal of Scientific Exploration Vol.20, 201,
2006
 ^ A. Kelly, Challenging Modern Physics (BrownWalker
Press, Florida, 2005)
 ^ M. Sato, The Velocity of Electromagnetic Wave is Observed
Differently Depending on the Observer’s Velocity, Physics Essays,
Vol.23, 405, 2010
 ^ J. Lévy, From Galileo to Lorentz... and Beyond,
Principles of a Fundamental Theory of Space and Time (C. Roy Keys Inc., Montreal, Canada, 2003) p49
201112
Top of page
Back to DSSU Home Page

