
(2017 December): 2nd printing of "The Nature of Gravitational Collapse":
(Details)
(2017 November): Coming up in a matter of weeks … another powerful research
paper … another devastating blow for the Big Bang. (Currently undergoing peer review. Details to follow.)
(2017 November): Special purchase offer on the book "Guide to the
Construction of the Natural Universe": (Mailin Order Form.)
(2017 Sept): Recently brought to my attention: DSSU material appears on The
New Illuminati website accompanied by some amazing graphics.
New Illuminati
–The DSSU is The New Cosmology
New Illuminati –Hidden Substrate of Reality
–History of the Aether Theory
(2017 Sept): "Assorted Comments" added to
QuestionsAnswersComments.
(2017 July): The book The Nature of Gravitational Collapse is
now available.
The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
Subtitle: How the photon, the particle of light, is responsible for mass,
gravity, superneutron stars, and supermassive black holes
—Reveals the truth about stellar and supermassive black holes.
This work contains 311+ pages, 67 illustrations, references, and
index. …
Second printing details (2017 November)
First printing details (Lambert Academic
Publishing).
(2016 December): “So easy to
understand” comment from an Australian engineer.
(2016 November): “LargeScale Structure of the Dynamic Steady
State Universe” now
published in the
American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.6,
2016, pp.6577.
Astract and Links to HTML and PDF.
(2016 June):
Revolutionary research paper:
The Nature of Gravitational
Collapse –published in the
American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.2,
2016, pp.1533.
Abstract and Links:
—Another
major DSSU success, as it reveals amazing new insights! The theory has
uncovered the mechanism by which mass undergoes a total conversion to
energy. Yes, a mass to energy conversion with 100% efficiency! As everything else in the DSSU, it is a
perfectly natural process. Truly amazing!
Have gravity waves really been detected?
Comments updated 2016 June: Comment #19
(2016426:) A mathematical cosmologist claims the values of the
Hubbleexpansion parameter and the cosmicbackground temperature are the
most important elements for understanding the real Universe!
Letter and response.
(2016 March) What is the difference between a physical and a
mechanical aether? ...
Be aware of the distinctions among the terms commonly applied to aether:
Terms such as physical, mechanical, subquantum, and dynamic.
Link to new Question & Answer.
The book, Guide to the Construction of the Natural Universe, is now available at the
Niagara Falls Public Library (Victoria branch). If you
live in the Province of Ontario, your local library can request the book
from the Niagara Falls
Public Library.
Participate in a unique exploration of the Cosmos: venture into the
subatomic realm, even into the subquantum realm where the roots of reality
reside, and into the domain of cosmicscale cellstructure and beyond to
infinity. Along the way, discover the cause of mass, the cause of
gravitation, and rediscover Einstein’s “nonponderable” aether and Heraclitus’
harmonyofopposites principle. … The book represents the ultimate
vindication for all the skeptics who resisted the "preposterous" Big Bang
mythology and who refused to join the explodingcosmos religion.
The book contains 317 pages, 61 illustrations, references, and
index …
Available from
CFAR Books.
Or use this
mailin Order Form.
My comments on the latest mass media "Official Science"
news story:
Do not be misled by the recent reports of the detection of gravity waves.
What the LIGO apparatus measures is the interference from beams of
selfgenerated electromagnetic waves. It seems highly probable that what
LIGO actually detected was some vibrational “noise” or some unexplained
interference; and NOT gravity waves originating from a distant binary system
(in which two extremely massive black holes are supposedly in the process of
merging). How the data, the wave patterns, are interpreted is subject to
theory and restricted by theory. Naturally the official
interpretation must conform to the Officiallysanctioned theory of gravity
—Einstein’s general theory of relativity. Thus, the light patterns recorded
by LIGO are interpreted via Einstein’s mathematical concept of gravity. The
problem is the generalrelativitygravity interpretation, as is well known,
ignores the space medium!
Have gravity waves really been detected?
Think about this: The academic experts do not have the cause and mechanism
of gravity (Isaac Newton did not, Albert Einstein did not, and today’s
bigbang astrophysicists do not). Their theory of gravity is embarrassingly
incomplete! So, if they do not yet understand the nature of gravity itself,
how then can they claim to be able to recognize the waves that gravity
supposedly emits? The experts cannot even answer the simple question:
Specifically, what is it that is waving? What is waving back and forth?
Here is something else the reports fail to mention: The
gravity waves that are actually detectable are those associated with the
turbulence in the aether flow (the space medium streaming through our Solar
System).
Australian physicist Reginald T. Cahill has been examining these aetherflow
waves for over 15 years. –CR (2016 May)
Updated 2016 June. See Comment #19
(2016 Jan 6) Now published:
Olbers’
Paradox Resolved for the Infinite NonExpanding Universe, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
Vol.4, No.1, (2016 January).
Abstract & download links.
Excerpts:
● “The man accredited with discovering universe expansion did not believe
that the universe was expanding. Hubble was convinced that the key evidence,
the cosmic redshift, was caused by some other factor, something more
fundamental than mere expansion.”
● “With the recent discovery of a new cosmicredshift mechanism, and its
theoretical validation, it turns out that Hubble was right.”
● Explains how “an infinite, nonexpanding, perpetually regenerating
universe" is able to predict a dark night sky.
Press Release (2015 Oct 15):
The Big Bang is no longer a viable hypothesis !
(2016 June)
FREE DOWNLOAD:
"DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence",
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "wellwritten and incisive
article."
(2015Oct 6) Webpage added for article CosmicRedshift Distance Law Without c
Without H: –Comments &
Links– Describes the challenge of getting DSSU papers
published.
(2015 Aug 20:) Allow me to extend a sincere "Thank You" for the many
invitations to join social media and professional networks.
Unfortunately I must decline. It’s simply a matter of precious time —there
is just too little of it. All my available time is taken up by research,
writing, and website maintenance —in fact, two more web domains have been
purchased. It is all being done for the purpose of providing the educated
and interested public with the ammunition to refute and replace the utterly
bankrupt bigbang Worldview. (However, not to give the impression of a total
recluse, seclusionist, or misanthrope, I do manage to squeeze in a few
delightful hours of ballroom dancing every week or two.) –CR
(2015 Aug:) Brief update on the status of the neutrino and its
adaptation into the DSSU particle theory. See
Section 5 of
the Discussion webpage
for the article: The Fundamental Process of Energy
(2015 Aug:) The article
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 1) has been revised.
(2015 July:)
Comments and questions from
a 14year old student.
RECENT
RESEARCH PAPERS:
"The Nature of Gravitational Collapse"
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics. (
Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r^{2}.)

"Olbers’ Paradox Resolved for the Infinite NonExpanding Universe"
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics. (
Abstract & download links.)

"DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence" published
in
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455473 (2015 Dec).
Abstract.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "wellwritten and incisive
article."

Published in the
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics,
AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015:
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies
Local highresolution PDF.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the firstever natural explanation for the cause of the
elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the
absurd concept of wholeuniverse expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and
exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very
same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!
Published Dec 2014 in the
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics:
"Cosmic Redshift in the Nonexpanding Cellular Universe” —details the
actual causal mechanism.
Abstract.
Preprint with larger images.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Entirely new concept for cosmic redshift mechanism;
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology;
• But does not require wholeuniverse expansion;
• A redshift based on the DSSU theory of unified gravity & cosmic cellular
structure;
• Remarkable agreement with independently established redshift distances.
Higgs Boson Discovered?
After 50 long years of searching, Physicists claim to have detected the
Higgs boson, the "particle" that ostensibly bestows the property of mass on
all other such particles. Is it now time to celebrate? … Definitely not.
The question now is this: If the Higgs ‘particle’ is the giver
of mass to all other particles, what then gives the Higgs itself its mass?!
(Yes, the newly discovered particle has mass, lots of it!) A difficult and
embarrassing question indeed. It is like asking: If
God created everything, then who, or what, created God?
While physicists think they have solved the mass problem, the
reality is that they have unwittingly exposed an even bigger problem —the
riddle of “First Cause”.

Glossary of Terms
used in Cosmology and Astrophysics with particular emphasis on DSSU theory.
(Opens in separate Window or Tab)

GENERAL INTEREST ARTICLES:
Mysteries & Paradoxes that Plague Standard Cosmology
(Updated 20157)
Cosmology Crisis of 1998 (Revised 20155)
Critique of Conventional Cosmology ...
comments relating to the 'preposterous' expandinguniverse paradigm.
Bafflement
—the remarkable admission of a physicist.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
—During the 20th century there was a decadeslong debate: The cataclysmic
expanding universe VS the stable expanding universe. But there has never
been a debate of the dynamic expanding universe VS the dynamic
nonexpanding universe. (Posted
2011 Oct)
Models of the Universe
—Historical, Expanding, and Cellular universes. INCLUDES A USEFUL TABLE FOR
COMPARING THEORIES.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 1)
—overcoming a "central" problem of cosmology theories.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 2)
—an explanation of how the universe can always have existed and will always
exist.
DSSU, The
NonExpanding Universe: Structure, Redshift, Distance
—A long soughtafter goal of astrophysicists has been a formulation of cosmic distance that is
independent of the speed of light. The goal has now been achieved. The
present Paper details the surprisingly simple distance expression and its
validating agreement with Supernova data.
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force.
(Posted April, 2011)
Gravity and Lambda —A Story of Opposites
(.htm) —A story of opposites in harmony. Key differences between the Conventional
Cosmology and the New Cosmology are presented.
Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the selfsustaining, selfbalancing system.
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Questions & Answers & Comments

COSMOLOGY ARTICLES, etc:
(2016 June) FREE DOWNLOAD details:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "wellwritten and incisive
article."
The Dynamic Steady State Universe.
This work brings together the main pieces of the cosmic
puzzle in a stepbystep construction of the Natural Universe.
Published in Physics
Essays Vol.27 No.2 (2014 June issue) (PDF download) "... the arguments
are wellmade. The article is competent, enjoyable and readable." —Reviewer
for Physics Essays Journal
Revolutionary:
Olbers’
Paradox Resolved for the Infinite NonExpanding Universe, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
Vol.4, No.1, (2016 January).
Abstract & download links.
Excerpts:
● “The man accredited with discovering universe expansion did not believe
that the universe was expanding. Hubble was convinced that the key evidence,
the cosmic redshift, was caused by some other factor, something more
fundamental than mere expansion.”
● “With the recent discovery of a new cosmicredshift mechanism, and its
theoretical validation, it turns out that Hubble was right.”
"Cosmic Redshift in the Nonexpanding Cellular Universe"
(Journal pdf)
—details the actual causal mechanism. Published in the
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol.2, No.5 (2014)
Abstract.
Local copy with quality images: (Preprint pdf).
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Entirely new concept for cosmic redshift mechanism;
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology;
• But does not require wholeuniverse expansion;
• A redshift based on the DSSU theory of unified gravity & cosmic cellular
structure;
• Remarkable agreement with independently established redshift distances.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
What historians call "the greatest cosmological debate in
history” was between TWO expanding universes —two
hypothetical models that share the same, I repeat, the same
foundational property! If one is to claim some great clash of ideas (let
alone the "greatest") then surely there must exist some deep dividing
difference! (Posted 2011 Oct)
The Case for a Cellular Universe
—the Story of a Baffling Omission in Modern Cosmology (Revised 2015)
LargeScale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe published in
the American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.6,
2016, pp.6577.
Astract and Links.
Highlights:
■ Presents the first 2 of the 4 main postulates that define the DSSU.
■ Spacemedium expansion and contraction are perpetually held in balance,
thus ensuring a nonexpanding universe.
■ Explains how the two dynamic processes of the DSSU’s space medium sustain
the cellular structure responsible for the pattern of matter distribution in
our Universe.
CosmicRedshift Distance Law Without c
Without H –Comments &
Links– Simplifying the redshiftdistance formula by removing the
speedoflight constant and the Hubble parameter —while maintaining
agreement with observational evidence.

DSSU Theory:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "wellwritten and incisive
article."
Theoretical
Foundation and Pillars of the DSSU (Introduction) —This
introductory essay gives a thematic tour of historical and modern universes
culminating with the Natural Universe.
Currently undergoing revision and updating: Theoretical Foundation and Pillars of the Dynamic Steady State Universe
(pdf) —The first complete presentation of all four
postulates of DSSU theory. A powerful paper that resolves the
causeofcauses paradox, explains the nonindependent nature of time, and
reveals the 'supreme advantage'. It includes a concise comparison with
standard cosmology focusing on realworld viability.
Supplementary Discussion: The
Primary Process
The Fundamental Process of Energy —A Qualitative Unification of
Energy, Mass, and Gravity. (Abstract
& Reviews & Links) … This article reveals
the secret behind photon confinement. (Contains only a bare minimum of mathematics
and mainly in one of the 14 sections.)
PART 1 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #113 (Jan/Feb 2014)
PART 2 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #114 (Mar/Apr 2014)
Headlined as:
A "Conceptual Unification of Energy, Mass and Gravity"
Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the selfsustaining, selfbalancing system.
Unified Gravitation Cells
of the DSSU —Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells
Space Flow
Equations and ExpansionContraction Rates (pdf) —This paper
explores the mathematical aspects of the two space postulates of DSSU
theory —and uncovers some profound consequences.

ARTICLES on AETHER:
Documentary
movie footage in which Einstein states, "There exists an aether"
—High
resolution .mpg video.
—Low
resolution .wmv video.
The
Aether Experiments and the Impact on Cosmology
—The aether has been detected at least 6 times in recent history. Its most
recent "rediscovery", in 2001, led to the longsought causal mechanism of
gravity —a discovery which, in turn, is revolutionizing cosmology.
MichelsonMorley and the
Story of the Aether Theory —Richard Milton's analysis of the
historical details involving the misrepresentation, bias, and coverup that
hampered the Aether theory.
The History of
the Aether Theory
—The historic development of the
aether as a scientific theory of space itself. What started as the "fifth
element" of Antiquity becomes molded by theoretical constraints and
experimental evidence into the dualdynamic subquantum medium —the Essence of the Universe.
(Updated
20162)
Relativity of
Time in the AetherSpace of the DSSU —How intrinsic time and relative time are related.
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to
AetherSpace —Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
The Physical Nature of Length Contraction
—the DSSU Theory of Length Contraction Induced by Absolute Motion.
An easy to follow examination of how the mode by which matter is “conducted”
through luminiferous aether causes the matter to contract. A simple
derivation of the mathematical expression for this physical phenomenon is
presented. There is also a brief discussion of relevant historical aspects
and of nonphysical length contraction.
Reviewer's comments:
“This is amazing …” “The paper is interesting …” –Applied Physics
Research reviewer. Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.1
(2013
Feb).
Contradiction Divides Two Aether Theories —An exploration into the three parts
of the speedoflight postulate.
Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays Journal
(Vol 24, No.3, Sept, 2011)
...
ABSTRACT
Basic  level mathematical and graphical exploration of dynamic aether flow:
PDF
Here is an external webpage with an extensive list of
research papers on the aetherdrift experiments, and the larger question of energy in space.

DSSU RESEARCH PAPERS:
DSSU Cosmic RedshiftDistance Relation (htm)
—Converting the cosmic redshift into distance for our Cellular Universe using
a simple and elegant equation.
Large Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe (pdf) How a dualdynamic space medium sustains the cellular structure
(published in AJAA in 2016).
—Presents the postulates and implications of regional spacemedium expansion and
contraction.
CosmicScale Structural Features Explained (pdf)
(Chapter 2 of original DSSU Manuscript)
—The Spacing of Clusters
—Sheets of Galaxies
—Supernodes
—Rightangled Walls of Galaxies.
The Cosmic Background Radiation in the DSSU
—The natural explanation of the microwave background radiation applicable to
the natural Cellular Universe.
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies,
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics,
AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Local
highresolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA
here.

GRAVITY:
"The Nature of Gravitational Collapse"
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics Vol.4,
No.2, 2016, pp.1533. (Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r^{2}.)
The Processes of Gravitation –The Cause and Mechanism of Gravitation by
C. Ranzan –A revolutionary paper on gravity published in the Journal of
Modern Physics and Applications Vol.2014:3
(2014).
( Abstract & Reviews & Links.
Includes link to hiresolution PDF) "Revolutionary".
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force. (Rev 20119)
First ever, journalpublished paper featuring the DSSU:
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
–Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol 23, No1,
p7587 (2010 Mar).
ABSTRACT
This is the cure for the fallacious belief in cosmicscale Dark Matter.
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
(Color version)
–Ranzan
Considered "an excellent contribution to the [PE journal]"
professional reviewer.
Unified Gravitation Cells of the DSSU
—Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells

RELATIVITY ARTICLES:
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
(●Abstract ●Links ●Excerpts ●Extras)
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Einstein’s Simple Mathematical Trick –and the Illusion of a Constant Speed
of Light
(Abridged version with links to Journalpublished version. Posted July 2013)
Extended Relativity –Exploiting the Loopholes in Einstein's Relativity.
A Logical extension of special relativity. Reprinted by permission of
PEP,
from
Physics Essays Vol.25, No.3 (2012 Sept).
— Abstract & Links & Reviews —
The Three Components of the SpeedofLight Postulate.
Published in Physics Essays journal Vol.26,No.1 (2013 March)
Local copy:
The
Three Components of the SpeedofLight Postulate (pdf):
Absolute vs relative. Variance vs invariance. Another instance of the Heraclitian
"Harmony of Opposites." (Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol.26, No.1,
2013).
Relativity of Time in the Aether
Medium of the DSSU
—Absolute Motion and Intrinsic Time
Resolving a Paradox in Special
Relativity –Absolute Motion and the Unified Doppler Equation.
(Posted 2011, July). Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.4, p594 (2010).
ABSTRACT
How DSSU Relativity Resolves the Speed Paradox (Introductory Discussion)
—Absolute Motion Resolves a (speed) Paradox in Einstein’s Special Relativity.
(Supplementary Discussion)
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to AetherSpace
(Posted 2011, July). Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 1)
—Response to a reviewer critical of DSSU aetherspace relativity
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 2)
—How to convert abstractspace equations into aetherspace equations
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy
Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.2
(2013 May).
LOCAL COPY:
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy —distinguishing
between the apparent energy and the real energy of moving mass.

An Open Letter to the Scientific Community
(Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of
hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed inflation, dark
matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there
would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers
and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics
would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a
way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the
least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.
..."
continues
...
A devastating Declaration of opposition to Big Bang cosmology
signed by more than 400 Researchers.
For the full text click on:
CosmologyStatement.org
or alternate
site.

INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM:
This website is mainly concerned with revisionism in cosmology. Those of us
involved in replacing the unnatural expandinguniverse paradigm are aware of
the difficulties involved.
However,
other revisionists have unimaginable difficulties. Consider the ongoing
persecution of revisionists in other fields of intellectual pursuit:
"It makes you wonder —about the immense effort being made
by State and Statesponsored organizations with budgets of tens of millions
of dollars and thousands of employees and associates to smother and punish
these few men and women. Every punishing instrument imaginable is used,
every vicious slander conceivable, every flagrant and pervasive form of
censorship that law allows, including the imprisonment of simple writers for
thought crimes against the State. ... Makes you wonder." —Bradley R. Smith (2011)
"Discussing truth is so controversial, so dangerous … In most of the
world it is simply illegal.”
Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, Veterans Today (2011)

DEDICATION: This website is solemnly dedicated to those
individuals who have conducted research in their chosen field and have
informed others of their inquiries and suffered the consequences when
subpoenaed by the Inquisition or some variant thereof. The dedication
extends to those individuals currently imprisoned, and those facing
trial and persecution simply for exercising their basic human right of
freedom of expression supposedly granted to them under the UN Charter of
Human Rights.
"Every
year, hundreds of writers and other literary professionals around the world
are imprisoned, prosecuted, persecuted, attacked, threatened, forced into
exile or even murdered as a result of their work."
ALSO: Be aware of the continuing threat to our precious freedom of expression on the
Internet. The threat is serious and relentless. It is described as “… the formal effort to mimic Communist China’s
system of Internet censorship.” See
The Secret Behind SOPA
(2012Jan).
Update.
More information on threats to internet freedom:
https://battleforthenet.com/
Reporterjournalist
Arthur Topham, Canadian victim of the Inquisition,
arrested (2012) for posting his research.
“Arthur Topham faces prison time for daring to speak his mind on his own
website, as he
faces criminal charges under Canada’s hate crimes legislation contained in
Section 318  320 of the criminal code.” –Rights and Freedoms Bulletin Issue
No. 204 Feb 7, 2015.
VERDICT: Arthur Topham found “guilty” AND “not guilty” of hate speech
by a braindead jury!
–Dr. James Sears, reporting in “The world’s
Largest AntiMarxist Publication” (Issue 2015 December,
http://www.yourwardnews.com/backissues.html)
2016 Update:
Panel
Discussion on The Trial of Arthur Topham
Freespeech crusader Bill Whatcott defies British Colombia
Human Rights Tribunal efforts to impose gender language tyranny.
“I have no intention on wasting money on a lawyer for the Morgane Oger vs
Bill Whatcott case, as human rights tribunals are kangaroo courts and the
odds of … getting justice in these biased tribunals is next to zero.” –2017
June (www.freenorthamerica.ca
…)
The struggle for freedom and justice in Canada lost its greatest
champion, its most dedicated defender. On March 11, 2013,
Douglas Christie
passed away.
British Maverick Psychologist
jailed for publishing his research. … “The ambivalence of librarians
getting writers imprisoned quite defies comprehension.” –Simon Sheppard
(2013)
The repression of free speech in Canada has degenerated to the point where …
■ Freedom advocates, such as Marc Lemire, are censured for merely expressing
their reasoned opinions. Freedomsite, whose motto is “Fighting
for freedom against the censorship enforcers”, documents the official
persecution.
■ A tenured professor has lost his position for revealing his research and
views on history. This is unprecedented. Professor Anthony J. Hall at the
University of Lethbridge, Alberta, has been suspended (2016 October 5)
without pay.
“… Any thinking person should recognize that there is something deeply wrong
when a history professor is persecuted for saying we should be able to
examine our history.” –Monika Schaefer 2017
■ A publisher/editor, for expressing his realitybased views, has been
denied postal services. Dr. James Sears, publisher and editor of
Your Ward News was
stripped of Canada Post Mail Service by government order (2016 June).
■ A violin teacher and truth revealer, Monika Schaefer, for posting a
video (an apology to her dead mother), has been attacked by various
socalled community leaders.
“The treatment of violinist Monika Schaefer signals the end of our free
and democratic society.” –The American Herald Tribune, 2016 Sept
■ American
Speaker Arrested in Canada for the textual material on his iPad
—2017 June 24
While the invasion continues, the “guardians” of the nation are busy
suppressing the freedom of expression: going after deemed violations in what
people think and write and say.
■
Canada Claims Authority to Censor Your Internet Searches –Reason
magazine
The Continuing Struggle for Freedom
A ray of hope in the ongoing struggle for freedom. Populist and nationalist
movements around the world are gaining ascendancy over the New World Order’s
effort to establish global governance and impose tyrannical control over
every last square meter of the Earth’s surface. –The Barnes Review
Vol.23 No.1 (2017 Jan p70)
In repressive Germany:
Ursula Haverbeck,
89, Sentenced to 14 Months in Jail for Heresy! –2017 November
This amazing 89yearold woman continues advocating under the dictum: "Only
the truth will set you free”.
Mrs. Haverbeck, along with her late husband, founded the education center
Collegium Humanum, but which was banned by the Marxist thought police in
2008.
For more on Freedom (and Objectivism),
visit: Just Right Media
(Website: http://www.justrightmedia.org)

... about the author ...
© Copyright 20052017 by
Conrad Ranzan & DSSU Research
All Rights Reserved
For information regarding permission to reproduce selected material
herein, please contact:
D S S U Research
Niagara Falls, Canada
16th year on the Internet.
Most recent update:
2017 Dec 3
Visits since mid2010 :
2017123 
 
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 1)
Response to a
reviewer critical of DSSU aetherreferenced relativity
Conrad Ranzan
2010
Some Background
The main purpose of the research paper
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz
Transformations Applied to AetherSpace is to present DSSU* relativity
(including the derivation of the extended Lorentz Transformations). The
secondary purpose is to show how an aetherbased theory subsumes Einstein’s
special relativity theory (ESR); to show how the ESR equations fit into a
broader and more realistic theory.
The paper challenges a belief long held by the Physics Community —the belief
that Einstein’s theory is incompatible with spacemedium theories.
Consider that the fundamental difference between DSSU relativity
and Einstein’s relativity is clearly irreconcilable —the former
embraces a subquantum space medium, the latter denies or ignores it. The fundamental
conflict is over aether space versus abstract space. Yet,
at a practical level, the two theories can be merged —and this can be
accomplished without altering the fundamental fact that all referenceframe velocities in DSSU are absolute (with respect to aether), while all
referenceframe velocities in ESR
are relative (with respect to an observer). ... The discussion below includes a description
of
the functional link —“the Key” of the main title.
There is an interesting historical aspect to all this. Einstein had
predicted, at a time when Dayton Miller was uncovering evidence of aether, that
if the detection of aether were to be confirmed, then it would mean the
invalidation of his theory of relativity. As it turned out, aether was
repeatedly detected. But Einstein’s relativity survived. Let me explain. The
detection of aether invalidated a premise that Einstein had considered essential
to his theory. But actually that premise was wholly unnecessary!
Einstein’s theory could work without it. And so, Einstein’s prediction of aether’s dire consequences was unfounded.
* DSSU is the acronym for Dynamic Steady State Universe. It is
a model based on the premise that all things are processes.
* * *
The paper
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to
AetherSpace (published in Physics Essays
Vol.23, No.3, 2010 Sept. (Abstract)) was
examined by three different reviewers. Two of the reviewers approved
publication; but one was unreasonably critical and adamantly opposed
publication. He wrote,
“I deeply regret that I have to reject the publication of this paper, as I do
admire Dr. Ranzan’s courage in recognizing the aether and the problem’s with
Einstein’s theory, which deserves encouragement as the prevailing mindset in the
physics community, especially in the theoretical physics community, takes
Einstein’s theory religiously, and the mathematical framework of relativity is
weaved into the entire edifice of particle physics and cosmology. It is my
sincere wish that Dr. Ranzan is not discouraged by my rejection to his
manuscript in his pursuit of a revolutionary theory.”
Then, in a subsequent review, he stated, “I will not change my
recommendation.”
What follows is my forwarded response to two issues raised by this Reviewer.

The Response
Let me address the two misconceptions the Reviewer seems to harbor with
respect to DSSU relativity.
(1) The Reviewer believes (as stated in his earlier review) that I have
“simply used the result of Einstein’s SR, changed the appearance of the
equations and claimed big discoveries” and in this way came up with DSSU
relativity. This is just not so. In fact, it is not possible, within
standard physics, to go from an Einstein Special Relativity (ESR) equation to
the corresponding DSSU equation.
(2) The Reviewer is under the impression that I am attempting to invalidate
the ESR theory. This, too, is just not so.
I will demonstrate, below, that DSSU subsumes ESR. I will demonstrate that
DSSU is a broader theory than ESR by showing that ESR equations can be derived
from the corresponding DSSU equation but it is not possible to go the other way.
That is, within the restrictions imposed by ESR it is not possible to expand the
equations to become DSSU equations.
DSSU Encompasses ESR
Both DSSU and ESR are rooted in the basic Lorentz transformations. The
Lorentz transformations ensure the property of “light speed invariance” —the
measured speed of light in a vacuum will always be constant regardless of the
uniform motion of the lightsource or the observer.
Starting with the Lorentz transformations (at the top of the
Flowchart 1,
below), DSSU theory uses them to derive the “extended Lorentz transformation
equations” [detailed in the Paper]; ESR theory starts with the same transformations and uses
them to derive the equations of special relativity.
DSSU theory uses the “extended Lorentz transformation equations” to derive
the relativity equations in which velocities are aetherreferenced. I’ll come
back to this in a moment.
The ESR equations are derived from the basic Lorentz transformations applied
to abstract space. The contentious assumption is that aether does not
exist (or that aether is simply not detectable). All inertial velocities, then,
must necessarily be relative and there can be no such thing as an
aetherreferenced speed —or as Einstein would say, no preferred frame of
reference.
This immediately precludes any attempts to derive DSSU equations from within ESR.
And so, contrary to the Reviewer’s interpretation of the Paper, it is not
possible to change the ESR equations into DSSU equations. The aetherreferenced
restriction prevents it and leads such attempt immediately to a “dead end” (as
shown in 2nd column of the flowchart).
Now to show how the DSSU equations can be used to derived the ESR equations.
An important point to keep in mind is that in DSSU relativity there are no
referenceframe restrictions. One is free to formulate the equations using
aetherreferenced motion (absolute inertial motion) or, if one chooses, using
relative motion (apparent inertial motion).




Flowchart 1. The Lorentz transformations can be properly applied to aether
space (left column) or to abstract space (righthand column). The chart shows
that Einstein’s relativity equations can be derived from an aether theory.
Consequently, the domain of DSSU Relativity encompasses the restrictive domain
of Special Relativity. 

As stated earlier, the DSSU relativity equations are derived from the “extended Lorentz transformation equations.” Since the extended transformations
are aetherreferenced, so too are the DSSU equations. The simple procedure, to
convert the latter to observerreferenced equations (relativemotion equations), is to assume that one of the inertial
frames is at rest. For instance, Observer in frame A considers himself
motionless, thus
u_{A} is replaced by zero. Then the motion of frame B becomes the
relative motion; and so
u_{B} is replaced by
u. ... Absolute velocities are simply
replaced by apparent velocities. This conversion is carried out in
Figures 5, 9,
11, and 12 of the Paper. The result in each case is a pure
relativemotion
expression (identical in appearance and performance to the Special Relativity
equivalent).
The key that acts as a link between absolutemotion formulation and
relativemotion formulation is the velocityconversion expression
(equation 47 shown in Flowchart 2,
below). If we apply a strict definition,
then this conversion key can only be used in the loop of the lower half of the
flowchart and acts to reverse the conversion described in the above paragraph.
The key essentially recaptures and verifies the original DSSU equation.
The key
cannot be applied to the ESR dashed area of the flowcharts; simply because of
the aetherreference prohibition. (If one removes the prohibition, then one
immediately removes the “dead end”.)




Flowchart 2. The DSSU conversion KEY (yellow highlight) is the link between
any ESR equation and the corresponding DSSU equation. This absolutetorelative
velocity transformation equation appears as eqn (47) in the
Journal article.
Substitute “the KEY” into any Einstein relativity equation to obtain the
corresponding DSSU equation. 

In the Manuscript, I apply “the key” to velocity transformation, length
contraction, momentum, and kinetic energy. The subsummation of ESR by DSSU could
not be clearer!
In the above demonstration I’m not even asking anyone to believe in the
actual existence of aetherspace. Purely on the basis of the mathematics, the
argument is sound and the conclusion remains that one theory is obviously
broader than the other.
ESR is a theory for abstract space, a theory of apparent motion and effects.
DSSU is a theory for quasiphysical space, a theory of absoluteandapparent
motion and effects.
The point of the argument is that the ESR expressions can be derived from an
aether theory —from DSSU relativity. One simply assumes (or concludes from
certain historical experimental evidence, as Einstein probably did) that
absolute motion, for whatever unknown reason, is undetectable. Then
u_{A} and
u_{B}
must be replaced by apparent velocities. If the observer is in frame A then
u_{A}
is replaced by zero and
u_{B} is replaced by relative velocity
u. (However, this
does not necessarily mean
u_{A} = 0. The
u_{A} and
u_{B} variables are still reserved for the
aetherreferencing of the inertial situation.) An apparenttype relativity equation follows
immediately from the DSSU expression. And that equation is identical to ESR!
—yet nowhere did I start my argument with an ESR equation.
And most importantly, DSSU is a broader theory and has more applications
since its domain encompasses both relative inertial motion and
absolute inertial motion.
The NonMerger of the Relative and the Absolute
There is one other feature of DSSU relativity I would like to discuss. It is
related to the fact that DSSU aether is an interactive aether —it causes
intrinsic relativistic effects.
In the normal course of having another one of my research papers reviewed,
one of the referees stated that, “They [relativistic aether theories] all seem
to fail due to trying to merge two different and conflicting paradigms, namely,
the relativistic and the absolute.” ... I reflected on the soundness of his
assessment; and then it struck me. I could now understand the probable
explanation of why I have not run into any major problems (not as yet, anyway);
my theory does not merge the relativistic and the absolute. The two are kept
separate and the symbols make the separation explicit. ... 
As an aside,
another vastly simplifying feature of the
DSSU Worldview
is that time has no independent existence; which means, there is no
absolute time to complicate the relativeversusabsolute issue. Time is an
abstraction by which we compare changes or motions of anything —anything
whatsoever. Motion is real; time is merely an abstracted aspect of motion
(change). ... Aristotle and Heraclitus were right, everything is motion. 
My present revised paper emphasizes the distinction between “the relativistic
and the absolute.” I have added the following paragraphs.
“However, it is important to realize that each ESR equation is not a special
case of the corresponding DSSU equation. It is by no means obvious, but both
equations give the same answer; they must because they both represent the same
observed or observable phenomena —such as apparent velocity, apparent length
contraction, apparent time dilation and apparent momentum, and so on.”
“Then it must be that both relativistic expressions are general. The DSSU
expressions always use aetherreferenced velocities and, within its domain, DSSU
relativity is general. The ESR expressions always use purely relative velocities
and, within its domain ESR, too, is completely general.”
The DSSU relativity theory, although it is a relativisticaether theory, does
not merge the absolute (defined by the aether) with the relative (the apparent).
Instead of merging the two domains, it uses simple rules and “the key” (see
Flowchart 2, above) to switch from one domain to the other.
Why is all this so important? ... It means there is no need to claim that ESR
is wrong. (Saying that a theory is incomplete does not make it wrong.) It means
that within its domain, within its sphere of applicability, there is nothing
wrong with Einstein’s special relativity.
In conclusion, with the various additions and corrections that have been made
in the latest revision the Paper has emerged much stronger. Furthermore, a
number of important changes should dispel any notion that I am attempting to
invalidate the ESR theory.
A reassessment would be appreciated.
Sincere thanks,
Conrad Ranzan
2010 Mar 10
* * * *

This ends my response to the Reviewer.
Part 2 of this web article demonstrates the mathematical connection between
ESR and DSSU relativity:
The Key that Extends
Einstein’s Relativity (Part 2)
● How to convert abstractspace equations into absolutespace equations
(and vice
versa).
● How to convert an ESR Equation into a corresponding AetherReferenced Equation.
201009
Top of page
Back to DSSU Home Page

