|
ANNOUNCEMENTS &
NEW ITEMS:
(Most recent at top of column)
(2024 July 12): Press Release:
Remarkable convergence of gravity theory and empirical evidence has revealed
the cosmic-scale geometry of the Universe.
The DSSU research article "Natural
Cosmic-Scale Geometry of Our Universe" has now been published. Links
are posted here. □
Meanwhile, the war on civilization escalates:
● See the reports at Big Sky Free Press –Beyond the Headlines
(http://www.bsfreepress.net/)
● Assassination attempt on President Donald Trump (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozCQwPyVKlE).
(2024 June 21): After some now-familiar rounds of fake reviews and
rejections, the latest DSSU research article —entitled Natural
Cosmic-Scale Geometry of Our Universe— has been accepted for
publication. It is an outstanding work, outstanding in the sense that
the underlying theory agrees wonderfully with the empirical evidence —the
abundant and incontrovertible astronomical observations. This is science of
the highest standard. And yet, one reviewer flatly asserted, “It is
completely unscientific,” and recommended rejecting the article
(prompting the editor of the Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation
and Cosmology to decline its publication). What!? Thirty-eight
supporting references is not science!? And what about the text and
diagrammatic content being as clear as a cloudless day? … Yes, that
journal, and two others, recognized a serious threat to their sacred
Worldview. □
Meanwhile the decline of civilization and the loss of freedom
continues.
There is an ongoing reinstitution of the ancient practice of
slavery. "During this revival of servitude and oppression, the systems of
enslavement have been greatly upgraded and enhanced, for the purpose of
effectively enslaving the entire human race."
"One of the true motivations behind the DNA altering vaccines, that
are being imposed on all of humanity, is to genetically engineer mankind
with a view to create a new model of human that will perfectly obey
their modern masters."
–Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Corona Investigative Committee, Grand
Jury Summary (
www.StopWorldControl.com )
(2024 March 8): The Cosmic Geometry paper is currently being
peer-reviewed.
Meanwhile: “The disintegration of Western civilization is
proceeding so rapidly that I cannot keep up with it even as a full time job.
… It is happening right in front of our eyes.” –PaulCraigRoberts.org
(2024 February): New research paper, focusing on the large-scale geometry
of the Cosmos, is currently being readied for publication. It details
the arrangement of gravity cells and how the rhombic dodecahedron is
embedded within a superoctahedron.
Meanwhile: Reflect on the mega-crime of the last century —Dresden
Hellstorm (February 13-15, 1945). It is appalling to think its
perpetrators were actually hailed as war heroes!
● The
Blood of Dresden by Kurt Vonnegut
●
Dresden 1945: The Devil’s Tinderbox by Charles Lutton
(2023 October): The
Gerhard Herzberg Award, 2023: Canada's most prestigious prize for
science and engineering went to Yoshua Bengio, a scientist who
helped make the AI revolution possible. As the scientific director of the
Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms and professor at the University
of Montreal, he is both excited and cautious about the future of the
technology he helped create. Congratulations.
(2023 October 12): George Orwell Free Speech Award, 2023:
Congratulations to Jurgen Neumann who was presented with the award
“For outstanding courage in challenging censorship and defending freedom in
pursuit of the truth and for outstanding talent as a freedom communicator &
videographer …”
(2023 September): Newly posted:
Question regarding The Fermi Paradox.
Where are other advanced civilizations?
Meanwhile, history continues to repeat itself and teach essential
lessons:
“As is becoming increasingly more obvious, even to historical novices,
mainstream academia, mass media and what passes for journalism these days is
agenda driven, not truth driven. Certain narratives and ideas that
advance particular agendas are elevated and promoted, while dissenting or
alternative perspectives and viewpoints are hysterically dismissed or
censored.” –The Barnes
Review Vol.29, No.5 (Sept/Oct 2023, p69)
(2023 August):
Important UPDATE to the so-call discovery/detection of gravity
waves (the ones predicted by Einstein’s geometric gravity theory). Turns
out no gravity waves were detected! Just as I had suspected and reported
years ago. … What the LIGO and VIRGO teams actually found was a match-up
between measured signal noise and preprogrammed idealized wave
patterns (i.e., computer stored preexisting general-relativity gravity
waves). It was simply the result of a computerized search to obtain a very
approximate and partial fit between measured signal and simulated “chirps.”
…What was presented to the ever-credulous public was not the actual recorded
waves, but rather the pre-stored-in-computer-memory idealized wave patterns!
Such are the findings of a collaboration of four researchers. [Abstract
& link to full article in the International Astronomy and
Astrophysics Research Journal]
Meanwhile, the collapse continues:
“The United States is falling apart in real time.” –The Barnes Review (July/Aug 2023,
p30)
Suppressed is the essence of the spirit needed to resist the accompanying
enslavement: “That traditional suspicion and disdain of an overreaching
centralized government; that ambitious, fearless, risk-taking outlook; that
love of individual liberty and personal freedom; that hardworking,
productive, can-do attitude —these and similar characteristics are the
essence of the true American spirit.” –The Barnes Review (July/Aug 2023,
p22)
(2023 July 28):
Author’s Curriculum Vitae has been updated to include the discovery
of meta-thermodynamics processes.
(2023 July 21): The revolution in cosmology continues. The first
documentation of Nature’s entropy-lowering mechanism —involving a
structure encompassing two separate and independent processes— has been
published. The latest DSSU article presents a discussion of how cosmic-scale
entropy neutrality is maintained —how two processes prevent the Universe
from ever running down. Press
Release.
Meanwhile: The Great Enslavement continues. The ongoing
implementation measures and events —including real and imagined crises— are
too numerous for the average person to keep track of, let alone deal with.
Sometimes too covert to recognize. Oftentimes seemingly benevolent, like the
pending implementation of digital currency. And always propagandized.
(2023 July 1): The report on Nature’s Entropy-Lowering
Processes has been accepted for publication. Five of five
journal-appointed Reviewers deemed the research article to be
"scientifically correct." ... Details to follow.
(2023 March 24 ... April 15): Latest research paper Nature’s Entropy-Lowering
Processes is currently under review.
Meanwhile: Tyranny in Canada! The persecution of Pastor Artur
Pawlowski. Listen to the incredible first-hand account: Just Right Program
#802 (2023-3-16)
(2023 February): DSSU research article currently being prepared deals with
entropy ... with a focus on Nature's remarkable entropy-lowering
mechanism.
(2023 January 16): Who would believe it! An American official holiday for
communism and its foremost promoter. Clearly the lessons of history have
been ignored … all the while the repression, and enslavement, continues.
(2023 January): DSSU Cosmology is now into its 22nd year
on the Internet —the revolution continues.
ANNOUNCEMENTS & comments from
earlier years are available HERE.
|
(2022 December 28): Now PUBLISHED !
“Laws of Physics Twentieth-Century Scientists
Overlooked”
Available on AMAZON.com
and on
amazon.ca
The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
Subtitle: How the photon, the particle of light, is responsible for mass,
gravity, superneutron stars, and supermassive black holes
—Reveals the truth about stellar and supermassive black holes.
This work contains 311+ pages, 67 illustrations, references, and
index. …
Second printing details (2017 November)
First printing details (Lambert Academic
Publishing, 2017 July)
Guide to the Construction of the Natural Universe
Participate in a unique exploration of the Cosmos: venture into the
sub-atomic realm, even into the sub-quantum realm where the roots of reality
reside, and into the domain of cosmic-scale cell-structure and beyond to
infinity. Along the way, discover the cause of mass, the cause of
gravitation, and rediscover Einstein’s “nonponderable” aether and Heraclitus’
harmony-of-opposites principle. … The book represents the ultimate
vindication for all the skeptics who resisted the "preposterous" Big Bang
mythology and who refused to join the exploding-cosmos religion.
The book contains 317 pages, 61 illustrations, references, and
index …
Available from
C-FAR Books.
Or use this
mail-in Order Form.
(Also available at
Niagara Falls Public Library)
POPULAR RESEARCH PAPERS:
Mass-to-Energy Conversion,
the Astrophysical Mechanism –Published in Journal of High Energy
Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, Vol.5, No.2 (2019).
HTML version.
Nature’s Supreme Mechanism
for Energy Extraction from Nonmaterial Aether –Published in
Infinite Energy
Magazine Vol.24,
Issue#144 (2019 March/April)
The Nature of Gravity –How One Factor Unifies Gravity’s Convergent,
Divergent, Vortex, and Wave Effects –Published in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol.6,
No.5, 2018.
-------------------------
Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme
Energy Particles –Published in Physics Essays
Vol.31, No.3, p358 (2018). (Reprint)
-------------------------
Sachs-Wolfe Effect Disproof –Published in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol.6, No.1, 2018. (
Abstract & Links.)
"The Nature of Gravitational Collapse"
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics. (
Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig-10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r2.)
|
Glossary of Terms
used in Cosmology and Astrophysics with particular emphasis on DSSU theory.
(Opens in separate Window or Tab)
|
GENERAL INTEREST ARTICLES:
Mysteries & Paradoxes that Plague Standard Cosmology
(Updated 2015-7)
Cosmology Crisis of 1998 (Revised 2015-5)
Critique of Conventional Cosmology ...
comments relating to the 'preposterous' expanding-universe paradigm.
Bafflement
—the remarkable admission of a physicist.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
—During the 20th century there was a decades-long debate: The cataclysmic
expanding universe VS the stable expanding universe. But there has never
been a debate of the dynamic expanding universe VS the dynamic
non-expanding universe. (Posted
2011 Oct)
Models of the Universe
—Historical, Expanding, and Cellular universes. INCLUDES USEFUL TABLES FOR
COMPARING THEORIES.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 1)
—overcoming a "central" problem of cosmology theories.
The Universe Is Infinite
(Part 2)
—an explanation of how the universe can always have existed and will always
exist.
DSSU, The
Non-Expanding Universe: Structure, Redshift, Distance
—A long sought-after goal of astrophysicists has been a formulation of cosmic distance that is
independent of the speed of light. The goal has now been achieved. The
present Paper details the surprisingly simple distance expression and its
validating agreement with Supernova data.
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force.
(Re-Posted February, 2014)
Gravity and Lambda —A Story of Opposites
(.htm) —A story of opposites in harmony. Key differences between the Conventional
Cosmology and the New Cosmology are presented.
Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system.
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Questions & Answers & Comments
|
COSMOLOGY ARTICLES, etc:
(2016 June) FREE DOWNLOAD details:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455-473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "well-written and incisive
article."
The Dynamic Steady State Universe.
This work brings together the main pieces of the cosmic
puzzle in a step-by-step construction of the Natural Universe.
Published in Physics
Essays Vol.27 No.2 (2014 June issue) (PDF download) "... the arguments
are well-made. The article is competent, enjoyable and readable." —Reviewer
for Physics Essays Journal
Revolutionary:
Olbers’
Paradox Resolved for the Infinite Non-Expanding Universe, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics
Vol.4, No.1, (2016 January).
Abstract & links.
Reprint PDF.
Excerpts:
● “The man accredited with discovering universe expansion did not believe
that the universe was expanding. Hubble was convinced that the key evidence,
the cosmic redshift, was caused by some other factor, something more
fundamental than mere expansion.”
● “With the recent discovery of a new cosmic-redshift mechanism, and its
theoretical validation, it turns out that Hubble was right.”
● Explains how “an infinite, non-expanding, perpetually regenerating
universe" is able to predict a dark night sky.
Cosmic Redshift in the Nonexpanding Cellular Universe (
Journal links
) —details the actual causal mechanism. Published in the
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol.2, No.5 (2014)
Abstract.
Local copy with quality images: (Reprint pdf).
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Entirely new concept for cosmic redshift mechanism;
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology;
• But does not require whole-universe expansion;
• A redshift based on the DSSU theory of unified gravity & cosmic cellular
structure;
• Remarkable agreement with independently established redshift distances.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
What historians call "the greatest cosmological debate in
history” was between TWO expanding universes —two
hypothetical models that share the same, I repeat, the same
foundational property! If one is to claim some great clash of ideas (let
alone the "greatest") then surely there must exist some deep dividing
difference! (Posted 2011-10)
The Case for a Cellular Universe
—the Story of a Baffling Omission in Modern Cosmology (Rev2014)
Large-Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe published in
the American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.6,
2016, pp.65-77.
Astract and Links.
Highlights:
■ Presents the first 2 of the 4 main postulates that define the DSSU.
■ Space-medium expansion and contraction are perpetually held in balance,
thus ensuring a non-expanding universe.
■ Explains how the two dynamic processes of the DSSU’s space medium sustain
the cellular structure responsible for the pattern of matter distribution in
our Universe.
Galaxy Morphology:
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics,
AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Journal
Abstract and Links.
Local
high-resolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA here.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the first-ever natural explanation for the cause of the
elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the
absurd concept of whole-universe expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and
exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very
same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!
Cosmic-Redshift Distance Law Without c
Without H –Comments &
Links– Simplifying the redshift-distance formula by removing the
speed-of-light constant and the Hubble parameter —while maintaining
agreement with observational evidence.
|
DSSU Theory:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence,
Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455-473 (2015 Dec)
—Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang.
Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "well-written and incisive
article."
A historical tour of
universes culminating with the Natural Universe —This
essay gives a thematic tour of historical and modern universes. ... While the Universe
is endlessly speaking, forever sending signals; philosophers and scientists
listen and interpret.
Currently undergoing revision and updating: Theoretical Foundation and Pillars of the Dynamic Steady State Universe —The first complete presentation of all four
postulates of DSSU theory. A powerful paper that resolves the
cause-of-causes paradox, explains the non-independent nature of time, and
reveals the 'supreme advantage'. It includes a concise comparison with
standard cosmology focusing on real-world viability.
The Fundamental Process of Energy —A Qualitative Unification of
Energy, Mass, and Gravity. (Abstract
& Reviews & Links) … This article reveals
the secret behind photon confinement. (Contains only a bare minimum of mathematics
and mainly in one of the 14 sections.)
PART 1 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #113 (Jan/Feb 2014)
PART 2 published in
Infinite Energy Magazine Issue
#114 (Mar/Apr 2014)
Headlined as:
A "Conceptual Unification of Energy, Mass and Gravity"
Dynamic Cosmic Cell
—The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion
of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system.
Unified Gravitation Cells
of the DSSU —Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells
Aether Flow
Equations and Expansion-Contraction Rates (pdf) —This paper
explores the mathematical aspects of the two space-medium postulates of DSSU
theory —and uncovers some profound consequences.
|
ARTICLES on AETHER:
Documentary
movie footage in which Einstein states, "There exists an aether"
—High
resolution .mpg video.
—Low
resolution .wmv video.
The
Aether Experiments and the Impact on Cosmology
—Aether was detected first in 1887 and then several more times during the
20th century. Its 21st–century "rediscovery" (in 2001) led to the long-sought causal mechanism of
gravity —a discovery which has revolutionizing cosmology.
Michelson-Morley and the
Story of the Aether Theory —Richard Milton's analysis of the
historical details involving the misrepresentation, bias, and cover-up that
hampered the Aether theory.
The History of the Aether Theory
—The historic development of the
aether as a scientific theory of the universal space medium. What started as the "fifth
element" of Antiquity becomes molded by theoretical constraints and
experimental evidence into the dual-dynamic sub-quantum medium —the Essence of the Universe.
(Updated
2019-12)
Relativity of
Time in the Aether-Space of the DSSU —How intrinsic time and relative time are related.
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to Aether-Space —Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
Physical Nature of Length Contraction
—the DSSU Theory of Length Contraction Induced by Absolute Motion.
An easy to follow examination of how the mode by which matter is “conducted”
through luminiferous aether causes the matter to contract. A simple
derivation of the mathematical expression for this physical phenomenon is
presented. There is also a brief discussion of relevant historical aspects
and of nonphysical length contraction.
Reviewer's comments:
“This is amazing …” “The paper is interesting …” –Applied Physics
Research reviewer. Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.1
(2013
Feb).
Contradiction Divides Two Aether Theories
—An exploration into the three parts of the speed-of-light postulate.
Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays Journal
(Vol 24, No.3, Sept, 2011)
...
ABSTRACT
Basic-level mathematical and graphical exploration of dynamic aether flow:
PDF
Here is an external webpage with an extensive list of
research papers on the aether-drift experiments, and the larger question of energy in space.
|
DSSU RESEARCH PAPERS:
Sachs-Wolfe Effect Disproof (published in in the International
Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science Vol.6, No.1, 2018.)
Abstract & links.
DSSU Cosmic Redshift-Distance Relation (htm)
—Converting the cosmic redshift into distance for our Cellular Universe using
a simple and elegant equation.
Large Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe (pdf)
How a dual-dynamic space medium sustains the cellular structure (published in AJAA in 2016).
—Presents the postulates and implications of regional space-medium expansion and contraction.
Cosmic-Scale Structural Features Explained (pdf)
(Chapter 2 of original DSSU Manuscript)
—The Spacing of Clusters
—Sheets of Galaxies
—Supernodes
—Right-angled Walls of Galaxies.
The Cosmic Background Radiation in the DSSU
—The natural explanation of the microwave background radiation applicable to
the natural Cellular Universe.
Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies,
American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Journal
Abstract and Links
Local
high-resolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA here.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the first-ever natural explanation for the cause of the
elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the
absurd concept of whole-universe expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and
exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very
same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!
|
GRAVITY:
The Nature of
Gravity –How One Factor Unifies Gravity’s Convergent, Divergent, Vortex, and
Wave Effects
–Published in International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science
(IJASS),
Vol.6, No.5, 2018, pp.73-92. (Abstract and Links.)
"Revolutionary"
The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics Vol.4,
No.2, 2016, pp.15-33. (Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig-10
caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r2.)
Gravity and Dark Energy (How they
Shape the Universe) –An Introduction. Provides a preamble and overview
for a couple of earlier DSSU articles.
The Processes of Gravitation –The Cause and Mechanism of Gravitation
by C. Ranzan –A revolutionary paper on gravity published in J. Mod. Phys.
Appl. Vol.2014:3 (2014).
(Abstract & Reviews & Links.
Includes link to hi-resolution PDF)
Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity
—Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force. (Rev 2011-9)
First ever, journal-published paper featuring the DSSU:
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
–Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol 23, No1, p75-87 (2010 Mar).
ABSTRACT
This is the cure for the fallacious belief in cosmic-scale Dark Matter.
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery
(Color version) –Ranzan
Considered "an excellent contribution to the [PE journal]" --professional reviewer
(2010).
Unified Gravitation Cells of the DSSU
—Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells
|
RELATIVITY ARTICLES:
Why
Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity
(●Abstract ●Links ●Excerpts ●Extras)
—“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his
relativity theories.”
Einstein’s Simple Mathematical Trick –and the Illusion of a Constant Speed
of Light
(Abridged version with links to Journal-published version. Posted 2013)
Extended Relativity –Exploiting the Loopholes in Einstein's Relativity.
A Logical extension of special relativity. Reprinted by permission of
PEP,
from
Physics Essays Vol.25, No.3 (2012).
— Abstract & Links & Reviews —
The Three Components of the Speed-of-Light Postulate.
Published in Physics Essays journal Vol.26,No.1 (2013)
Local copy:
The
Three Components of the Speed-of-Light Postulate (pdf):
Absolute vs relative. Variance vs invariance. Another instance of the Heraclitian
"Harmony of Opposites." (Reprinted by permission of PEP, from
Physics Essays, Vol.26, No.1,
2013).
Relativity of Time in the Aether
Medium of the DSSU
—Absolute Motion and Intrinsic Time
Resolving a Paradox in Special Relativity –Absolute Motion and the Unified Doppler Equation.
(Posted 2011, July). Reprinted by permission of
PEP, from
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.4, p594 (2010).
ABSTRACT
How DSSU Relativity Resolves the Speed Paradox (Introductory Discussion)
—Absolute Motion Resolves a (speed) Paradox in Einstein’s Special Relativity.
(Supplementary Discussion)
DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to Aether-Space
(Posted 2011). Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication,
Physics Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010).
ABSTRACT
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 1)
—Response to a reviewer critical of DSSU aether-based relativity
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 2)
—How to convert abstract-space equations into aether-based equations
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy
Published in
Applied Physics Research journal
Vol.5, No.2
(2013).
LOCAL COPY:
Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy —distinguishing
between the apparent energy and the real energy of moving mass.
|
An Open Letter to the Scientific Community
(Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of
hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark
matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there
would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers
and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics
would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a
way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the
least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.
..."
continues
...
A devastating Declaration of opposition to Big Bang cosmology
signed by more than 400 Researchers.
Full text:
CosmologyStatement.org
or alternate
site.
|
INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM:
This website is mainly concerned with revisionism in cosmology. Those of us
involved in replacing the unnatural expanding-universe paradigm are aware of
the difficulties involved.
However,
other revisionists have unimaginable difficulties. Consider the ongoing
persecution of revisionists in other fields of intellectual pursuit:
"It makes you wonder —about the immense effort being made
by State and State-sponsored organizations with budgets of tens of millions
of dollars and thousands of employees and associates to smother and punish
these few men and women. Every punishing instrument imaginable is used,
every vicious slander conceivable, every flagrant and pervasive form of
censorship that law allows, including the imprisonment of simple writers for
thought crimes against the State. ... Makes you wonder." —Bradley R. Smith (2011-1)
●
"Discussing truth is so controversial, so dangerous … In most of the world it is simply illegal.”
–
Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, Veterans Today (2011)
●
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who
speak it." –George Orwell
● Why the suppression of free speech is so deadly dangerous:
“When you silence the man of the pen, you
must deal with the man of the sword.” –proverb
● "Free speech is the
essence of Civilization."
–Stephen Molyneux, Address at the EU Parliament (2019-1-21).
|
DEDICATION: This website is solemnly dedicated to those
individuals who have conducted research in their chosen field and have
informed others of their inquiries and suffered the consequences when
subpoenaed by the Inquisition or some variant thereof. The dedication
extends to those individuals currently imprisoned, and those facing
trial and persecution simply for exercising their basic human right of
freedom of expression supposedly granted to them under the UN Charter of
Human Rights.
"Every
year, hundreds of writers and other literary professionals around the world
are imprisoned, prosecuted, persecuted, attacked, threatened, forced into
exile or even murdered as a result of their work."
ALSO: Be aware of the continuing threat to our precious freedom of expression on the
Internet. The threat is serious and relentless. It is described as “… the formal effort to mimic Communist China’s
system of Internet censorship.” –
www.InfoWars.com
More information on threats to internet freedom: https://battleforthenet.com/
End of free speech in Britain:
A publisher of history books in Britain has reported that “due to new laws
in the UK all their books will have to be censored moving forward” to avoid
criminal penalties for “inciting racial hatred.” –The Barnes Review (2020 March/April)
p77
A hostile jury, by a hasty unanimous
verdict, decided that British Nationalist Leader Jez Turner deserves to be sent to
jail for his critical views! Report (2018-5-15).
British Maverick Psychologist
jailed for publishing his research. … “The ambivalence of librarians
getting writers imprisoned quite defies comprehension.” –Simon Sheppard
(2013)
In repressive Germany:
Ursula Haverbeck,
89, Sentenced to 14 Months in Jail for Heresy! –2017 November
This amazing 89-year-old woman continues advocating under the dictum: "Only
the truth will set you free”.
Mrs. Haverbeck, along with her late husband, founded the education facility
Collegium Humanum in 1963, but which was banned by the Marxist thought police in
2008.
Update (2018-5-16): Ursula Haverbeck will celebrate her 90th birthday in a
German prison
cell. The sprightly grandmother is now serving a
two-year prison term without parole merely for stating a sincerely
held opinion that is supported by acclaimed academics worldwide!!
“Frau Haverbeck is now sentenced to two years in prison, merely for her
peaceful historical research” –The Barnes Review Vol.24, No.5
(Sept/Oct 2018) p71
UPDATE (2019-11):
On November 9th (2019), the very day of Ursula Haverbeck’s 91st. birthday,
hundreds of German nationalists, patriots and friends, well-wishers and
admirers rallied in her support. Report on the Rally to Celebrate
Political Prisoner Ursula Haverbeck.
Update (2020-12): This 92-year-old peaceful woman has just
been released from jail, having spent 2&1/2 years behind bars, and less than
2 weeks later was in court in Berlin for more charges ... was
again sentenced to prison!!!
INFO on Monika Schaefer's case: https://wir-sind-monika.com/
For expressing her opinion on historical events, Canadian citizen
Monika Schaefer has been arrested and imprisoned
(2018-1-3) in Germany. She had committed no crime. Author Mike Walsh warns
potential visitors to Germany to stay away from this dangerous police state.
–Merkel
Madness Grips Germany, (2018-1-7)
... Found guilty and sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment (time
served); her brother Alfred was sentenced to 38 months!! –(2018
November)
UPDATE (2019 August 10): Corruption of justice in Germany continues.
Alfred Schaefer
Receives 18 Months Additional Prison Time for Defending Himself!
Punished for simply presenting evidence for his own defense in court!
The 2022 George
Orwell Free Speech Award was presented to Alfred and Monika Schaefer,
July 30, 2022 in Vancouver.
A Response &
Appreciation of the Awards to Monika & Alfred Schaefer, by Timothy Cuish
of the Daily Rake.
The Supreme Irony:
Fellow freedom-lovers and truth-seekers, please pay
close attention. ... Chemist, historian, and author, Germar Rudolf
sums up the persecution in Germany as follows:
“Now I will summarize here the pseudo-logic hiding behind this absurd and
criminal nonsense of persecuting dissidents. This logic of those in power in
[Germany] really amounts to this:
Because in the past minorities have been persecuted, dissidents imprisoned
and books burned, one feels obliged to do everything in order to prevent a
repetition —even if that entails having to persecute minorities, imprison
dissidents and burn books. [Italics as in the original.]
Because that is exactly what is happening today! Absolutely nothing has been
learned from the past. The table is merely turned around, and for a change a
different group is now being persecuted.”
–Germar Rudolf, Resistance is Obligatory 2nd edition (Castle Hill
Publishers, Box 243, Uckfield, UK, 2016) p213
□
The Continuing Struggle for Freedom
A ray of hope in the ongoing struggle for freedom. Populist and nationalist
movements around the world are gaining ascendancy over the New World Order’s
effort to establish global governance and impose tyrannical control over
every last square meter of the Earth’s surface. –The Barnes Review
Vol.23 No.1 (2017 Jan p70)
"This
Is Very Serious" –S. Molyneux, 2018-7
(7-minute
video on the importance of freedom of speech)
The ongoing fight for freedom and truth. –Just
Right Media (2020, Sept 18, program)
● Pro-Freedom NEWS:
Vanguard News
● InfoWars NEWS: InfoWars
| AlexJones
● Freedom Force
Red Pill University
for truth-seekers.
For more on Freedom (and Objectivism),
visit:
Freedomain Radio (www.freedomainradio.com)
presented by Stefan Molyneux.
Just Right Media (www.justrightmedia.org)
|
... about the author ...
Curriculum Vitae
© Copyright 2005-2024 by
Conrad Ranzan & DSSU Research
For information regarding permission to reproduce selected material herein, please contact:
D S S U Research
Niagara Falls, Canada
23 years on the Internet.
Most recent update:
2024 Aug 30
Visits since mid-2010 :
2024-8-30
|
| |
Natural transformation of mass energy to photonic energy:
● Highlights ● Reviews ● Comments
Supplementary material relating to the published article “Mass-to-Energy
Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism”
Conrad Ranzan
2019
|
What is meant by "Mass-to-Energy Conversion" in the astrophysical context?
The "Conversion" refers to the natural transformation of mass energy to
photonic energy. It is an "Astrophysical Mechanism" because it is associated
with end-stage gravitational collapse and subsequent collisions of
mass particles with the collapsed body.
|
|
Highlights of the Research Article
One Sentence Summary: Using only basic physics and relativistic
motion, using them in a way that exploits the distinction between
apparent and innate levels of reality, the article follows a
logical sequence in explaining how mass converts to energy, how that
conversion leads to an explanation of the mechanism driving astrophysical
jets, and further, how the mechanism provides the resolution to the
long-standing paradox of stellar black holes.
Main theme: The
procedure involves relativistic motion and mechanical energy equations.
These are combined to form a simple energy triangle, which is then
manipulated to explain mass-to-energy conversion. It’s as simple as that.
With a child’s play manipulation of triangles the standard and new
interpretations are clarified and compared.
Exploited is the
enormously important distinction between apparent and intrinsic aspects:
including motion, momentum, kinetic energy, and total energy.
Recalled is Sir James
Jeans prescient insight from the 1920’s into how the process of mass conversion
(to energy) is merely that of unbottling imprisoned wave-energy and setting it
free to travel through space.
Implemented is a
three-part strategy to accomplished TOTAL mass-to-energy conversion:
1. Make the motion relative to the universal space medium. This
allows the introduction of the concept of intrinsic energy (total, kinetic, and
mass energies) as counterpart to the apparent version.
2. Recognize that a particle’s mass property diminishes with
increase in speed. This means introducing the concept of intrinsic mass
(which varies with intrinsic speed).
3. Impose a change in the particle’s gravitational environment.
Instead of applying an electromagnetic accelerating force/energy in order to
alter the particle’s total energy, there will simply be an environmental change.
Explored is the
remarkable consequence of this mass-to-energy conversion and the associated
limitless energy-amplification process. When combined, the two processes lead to
a compelling explanation of the mechanism driving astrophysical jets.
Followed is a
conceptual trail that starts with “unorthodox” relativity and “bottled” energy,
takes us along a natural course through to limitless power, and finally leads to
stellar astrophysical jets. All in all, another great success for DSSU theory.
|
Willful Blindness? Lack of Knowledge? Professional Fakery?
When I submitted the Mass-to-Energy Conversion
article to the Editorial Office of the Canadian Journal of Physics,
I made it clear that “The ideas being presented are innovative,
provocative, timely, and should be of interest to the broad physics
community.” I emphasized, “This paper is definitely original.”
The chief editor of Canadian Journal of Physics, Dr.
Michael Steinitz, rejected the work saying (2019 January 3) “it is not
suitable for the scope that we have set out for the journal” … that it
was not of sufficiently “high interest for the widest audience of
physicists.”
Now, isn’t that odd? Apparently, Michael Steinitz
believes readers of the Journal would not be interested in the
newly-uncovered mechanism of the natural transformation of mass energy
to photonic energy.
What?! Physicists not interested in a new mode of
mass-to energy conversion?! … Let’s be clear, we are talking here about
the most powerful energy producing mechanism in the universe.
Physicists (even lay observers) are familiar with mass-to-energy
conversion through mass-and-antimass annihilation; but the
astrophysical mechanism being presented is an entirely alien concept to
them. The academic experts have nothing comparable.
So what’s going on? … Why reject something that
obviously would hold great interest for the widest possible audience?
I can see only three possibilities here:
1. Dr. Michael Steinitz did not bother to read the
paper. This falls under the category of Willful Blindness.
2. Dr. Steinitz read the paper but did not understand
it. This falls under the category of Lack of Knowledge. (Highly
unlikely. I say this because there is nothing in the article of a
technical nature that requires a knowledge of anything beyond
first-year university physics.)
3. The editor(s) of the Canadian Journal of Physics read
the paper and understood it only too well. They recognized its
game-changing implications. The grounds for rejection were entirely
bogus. This falls under the category of Fakery.
Allow me to expand on the three possible motivators.
Willful Blindness. (I actually experienced this
with a different research paper. The reviewer in that instance was
honest enough to state that he did not like the conclusion and
therefore refused to do a proper review. No reason was given; and the
article’s reasoned presentation and logical arguments were ignored; and
were probably not even considered. I learned about this from the
assistant editor.) No, I do not think this applies to Dr. Steinitz. If
he had the slightest tingling of curiosity and confronted with a title
making such bold claims, he would surely have read the article.
Lack of Knowledge. Assuming Dr. Steinitz read the
manuscript it would be extraordinarily unlikely that he failed to
understand its content. True enough, there has been over the years a
radical decline in educational standards. (The disparagement of
biological evolution is a disturbing example. And most disturbing is
how the world’s biggest problem, overpopulation, is ignored; while
educators are endlessly promulgating the comparatively trivial issue of
climate change.) It is inconceivable that any editor of a physics
journal does not understand basic physics.
The paper is based on three fundamental concepts: First,
the existence of a universal space medium (there is no physicist who
openly disagrees on this). Second, the electron is a confined photon;
and extending the concept, all the other fundamental mass particles are
nothing more than unique configurations of confined photons. Third, the
mass of a particle or object diminishes with an increase in speed (that
is, mass is reduced as aether-referenced motion increases).
Importantly, these essential features DO NOT violate the laws of
physics.
Nevertheless, say the Editor read and understood
everything, but found that it just did not fit into his indoctrinatory
picture of reality and simply could not bring himself to accept its
validity. … It may be that Dr. Steinitz has been thoroughly
indoctrinated and is quite unable to assess true and factual
information. This kind of impairment is a far more serious threat to
innovative thought than most people realize. Back in the 1980s, the
Russian official Yuri Bezmenov warned of a growing menace creeping into
the education system and our society. “A person who is indoctrinated
is unable to assess true information, the facts tell nothing to him …
even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with
documents, with pictures … even if I take him, by force, to the Soviet
Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it.”
(From a 1984 interview with Russian KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov.)
Fakery. Dr. Steinitz read the manuscript and
fully understood what it’s all about. He recognized that here is a new
development that could potentially disturb the consensus view of
physics. And as a lowly gatekeeper of the “officially approved”
established view, his duty was, and is, to block heretical sources and
guard against any dissenting ideas. He had no choice but to reject the
manuscript. Or to put it more bluntly, lacking the backbone to act
independently and valuing orthodoxy over truth, he had no choice but to
refuse publication. But, for the sake of decorum, what was to be the
justification for the refusal?
The rejection decision would have been so easy, if
only the paper had been flawed, if only there had been some
fatal deficiency or error in the work. Then there would have been no
need for the fake excuse that the readership of the Canadian Journal of
Physics would be little interested.
Like so many others who have tried, he failed to
meaningfully discredit the arguments. He failed in spite of the fact
that the theory is being clearly stated, purposely made easy to
understand, and uses only basic physics. And keep in mind, the
motivation is surely there —the motivation to find someone else’s
blunder. Next to creating a successful theory, making a great
discovery, there is nothing a scientist enjoys more than to destroy
someone else’s theory or discovery.
Yes, Dr. Steinitz recognized the threat. His rejection
letter closed with the statement, “I hope the outcome of this specific
submission will not discourage you from the submission of future
manuscripts.” But he failed to inform me that my “author account” was
made inaccessible —blocked to any further submissions.
In an email to Dr. Steinitz, I pointed out how
extraordinarily odd it is that he would claim this matter to be of
insufficient interest to the readers of the Canadian Journal of
Physics. I asked him “Do you seriously believe that your target
audience, mostly physicists and others with an earnest interest in the
physical sciences, would not value this new insight!? Should they not
be made aware of this new knowledge?”
No reply.
Maybe he knows something about this topic that I’m not
aware of. So, to cover this contingency, I had included a further
question: “Are you, Dr. Michael Steinitz, aware of any mechanism
involving the total 100-percent conversion of mass to energy NOT
involving particle-antiparticle annihilation? Aware of any such process
or mechanism? Small scale? Large scale?
Silence. No response to my questions. I really would
have appreciated a response from the Editor. … It would have been most
useful for understanding the bizarre nature of this rejection.
It certainly looks like “Mass-to-Energy Conversion,
the Astrophysical Mechanism” was a victim of professional fakery.
Some spineless indoctrinated gatekeeper for an elitist science journal
carried out his duty of guarding against new ideas that may
contaminating the official line —the acceptable “editorial scope.”
–C. Ranzan (2019-5) |
"Science Advances" journal rejects major advance:
rejects "Mass-to-Energy Conversion"
Date: 2019-01-08 11:08:16 AM Eastern
Standard Time
From: scienceadvanceseditorial@aaas.org | To: DSSUresearch4@aol.com
Title: Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism
Dear Dr. Ranzan,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Science
Advances. Because your manuscript was not given a high priority
rating during our initial assessment, we have decided not to send your
paper for further review.
Science Advances aims to publish significant,
innovative, original research that advances the frontiers of science
and extends the high standards of excellence established by the Science
family of journals. We receive many very interesting submissions, more
than we can possibly send out for in-depth review or publish. Our
decision regarding your manuscript is therefore not necessarily a
reflection of the quality of your work, but rather of our constraints
and goals in publishing high impact results across a broad and balanced
array of disciplines.
Thank you for your submission to and interest in
Science Advances.
Best Regards,
Warren Warren, PhD | Deputy Editor | On behalf of
the Science Advances Editorial Team
My comments: So,
this highly significant, truly innovative, original research that
advances the frontiers of science by solving several of the biggest
mysteries in astrophysics does not —according to the guardians of
orthodoxy the Science Advances Editorial Team— meet the criteria of
Science Advances journal. And what are their criteria for assessing
publication worthiness? … “Science Advances aims to publish
significant, innovative, original research that advances the frontiers
of science.”
Such hypocrisy! They did not even perform a proper review. … One
wonders: During their “initial assessment,” did they find that the
Mechanism was too significant? too innovative? too original?
A powerful new mechanism for the Natural transformation of mass energy to
photonic energy (supported by a simple extension of Einstein’s theory)
has been uncovered but, again, an elitist mainstream journal is not
interested!
Amazing but not surprising.
Almost two decades ago, Dr. Halton Arp, who at that time
was professor of astrophysics at the Max Planck Institute for
Astrophysics near Munich, summarized the deplorable situation in
science generally and in astrophysics particularly as follows:
“The
most harmful aspect of what science has become is the deliberate
attempt to hide evidence that contradicts the current paradigm. […] In
a quite human fashion, however, they [the peers] act in an exactly
opposite manner —judging that ‘if an observation [or finding] disagrees with what we
know to be correct, then it must be wrong.’ The tradition of ‘peer
review’ of articles published in professional journals has degenerated
into almost total censorship.” *
–C. R. (2019-2)
* Ref. Halton Arp, “What has science come to?” Journal of
Scientific Exploration, Vol.14, No.3, pp.447-454 (2000)
|
Review by International Journal of High Energy Physics
The initial review from International
Journal of High Energy Physics was simply this:
“In general, the quality of the paper is not good.
Theoretical depth is insufficient, and a lot of reasoning is not
reasonable. This article is not acceptable.” –per review of Manuscript
#1241023
My response:
To: Editorial Staff (IJHEP), Science Publishing Group
(revision01@sciencepg.com) (J.G.)
The reviewer states “a lot of reasoning is not
reasonable” but does not give a single example!! I have carefully gone
through the paper and everything is presented logically, argued
rationally, and always supported with references. Please ask the
reviewer to provide instances so that I may correct the alleged flaws
in the reasoning.
The mathematical reasoning follows that used in the
textbook (Halliday, D., Resnick, R., and Walker, J. Fundamentals of
Physics Extended, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New
York, 1997). This is a highly respected and authoritative textbook.
I have had other physicists go over the Paper and they
reported neither errors in the physics nor flaws in the logic.
As stated in the opening section of the Paper: … “The
purpose of the presentation is three fold: The first is to present the
mathematical underpinning of the mass-to-energy conversion. The second
is to detail the physical aspects of the conversion mechanism. The
third is to examine the role that mass conversion plays in powering a
major astrophysical phenomenon.” I stated the purpose very clearly
and provided 20 pages of detailed reasoned arguments to achieve the
stated purpose (all three of its parts).
If the Reviewer found a factual error or a flaw in the
logic, the Reviewer should at least be specific as to what those are.
Regards,
Conrad Ranzan (2019-2-6)
-----------------------------------------------
Subsequent reviews from International
Journal of High Energy Physics:
“1. The manuscript is of no scientific quality and
cannot be recommended for publication.”
“2. I have read the manuscript titled
Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism. The
topic is interesting and took my attention. However, the manuscript
structure is not enough to be published as research article/research
paper, for example there is no introduction part, literature review,
etc. Besides, the language is not appropriate for an academic research
article, as there are many sentences starting with ″and″ and the
correct usage of MeV is not ″Million electron volts (Mev)″. MeV stands
for mega-electron volts in physics. In the current form, it could be
classified as ″letter to editor″ not a research paper.”
[The Reviewers’ comments are
merely unsubstantiated generalizations and utterly trivial issues. –CR]
My response:
To: Editorial Staff (IJHEP), Science Publishing Group
(revision01@sciencepg.com) (J.G.)
ITEM 1. Regarding the paper’s scientific quality: The
theory underlying the described Mechanism was recently published (see
Reference #21). The physicists who assessed the scientific quality
considered the work “scholarly and erudite”.
ITEM 2. There is no introduction literature review.
The reason there is no literature review on the Mechanism is because it
is a NEW discovery! No one has ever discovered any mechanism involving
the total 100-percent conversion of mass to energy and NOT involving
particle-antiparticle annihilation. This is entirely new and
revolutionary. Physicists are simply unaware of any such large-scale
process or mechanism.
Regarding “Million” versus “Mega-”: “Million” and
“Mega-” mean exactly the same thing! They both mean 1,000,000.
So from the perspective that matters
most, this is clearly good news. The Reviewers (both previous and
present Reviewers) reported NO flaws in the logic and NO errors in the
physics. The Editor is fortunate to have here a high quality
revolutionary paper rationally argued and mathematically supported and
consistent with the laws of physics.
Please inform the Editor that I grant the copyeditor
permission to change “Million” to “Mega-” and to remove any
objectionable instances of “And” being used as sentence openers; as
well as any other minor changes in preparation for publishing.
Thank you. Sincerely,
Conrad (2019-2-19)
-------------------------------------------
REJECTED. No reason given. (Rejection notice received
2019-03-11.)
|
Review by Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology
“In this paper the author gives a new interpretation of
the famous Mass-to-Energy Conversion and discusses interesting
astrophysical consequences of such a new interpretation.
[Recommend the paper be] published in JHEPGC because it
seems that the manuscript could …
positively contribute to a better understanding of the mechanism
driving astrophysical jets and to the debate on the existence or
non-existence of black hole horizons and singularities.”
–Referee Report (2019-4-3)
ACCEPTED for publication 2019-4-9. |
Press Release (2019 May):
Simple extension of Einstein’s relativity theory
radically changes black-hole physics
The latest DSSU research extends Einstein’s relativity
theory in a way that makes possible the 100-percent conversion of mass to
energy WITHOUT involving matter and antimatter annihilation.
Moreover, the easy-to-understand new (and more inclusive)
interpretation of mass and motion resolves paradoxes associated with
conventional black holes.
Essentially, this article† shows: How to use basic
relativity equations to explain mass-to-energy conversion. It provides the
mathematical support for the recently discovered astrophysical mechanism
that powers Terminal-star jets (popularly called “black hole” jets). More
specifically, it details the theoretical foundation of the total
conversion of mass to energy without invoking matter-antimatter
annihilation.
The proof: If you like mathematical arguments, a basic algebra proof is
presented in step-by-step detail. If averse to mathematical reasoning, no
problem; a straightforward graphic/diagrammatic sequence works just as
well. Either way the logic is foolproof; the conclusions compelling. What
this means is that we now have the theoretical underpinnings for the
recently discovered mechanisms detailed in two previous articles:
■
Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme Energy
Particles, Physics Essays Vol.31, No.3, pp.358-376 (2018). [Reprint]
■ Nature’s
Supreme Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Nonmaterial Aether, Infinite
Energy Vol.25, Issue#144 (2019 March/April). [Link to Issue#144]
A precedent for DSSU theory. For the first time, it is being published
in a journal dedicated to high-energy physics. The periodical is the
Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology. The article
title is
“Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism.”†
Highlights of the
article detailing the new interpretation:
■ The presentation uses relativistic motion and mechanical energy
equations, combined to form a simple energy triangle; and then the
triangle is manipulated to explain mass-to-energy conversion. It’s as
simple as that. With a child’s play manipulation of triangles the standard
and new interpretations are clarified and compared.
■ Exploited is the enormously important distinction between apparent
and intrinsic aspects: including motion, momentum, kinetic energy, and
total energy.
■ Recalled is Sir James Jeans prescient insight from the 1920’s into
how the process of mass conversion (to energy) is merely that of
“unbottling” imprisoned wave-energy and setting it free to travel through
space.
■ Implemented is a three-part strategy to accomplished TOTAL
mass-to-energy conversion:
1. Make the motion relative to the universal
space medium. This allows the introduction of the concept of intrinsic
energy (total, kinetic, and mass energies) as counterpart to the apparent
version.
2. Recognize that a particle’s mass property diminishes with
increase in speed. This means introducing the concept of intrinsic mass
(which varies with intrinsic speed).
3. Impose a change in the particle’s
gravitational environment. Instead of applying an electromagnetic
accelerating force/energy in order to alter the particle’s total energy,
there is simply an environmental change.
■ Explored is the remarkable consequence of this mass-to-energy
conversion and the associated limitless energy-amplification process. When
combined, the two processes lead to a compelling explanation of the
mechanism driving astrophysical jets.
■ Followed is a conceptual trail that starts with “unorthodox”
relativity and “bottled” energy, takes the reader along a natural course
through to limitless power, and finally leads to stellar astrophysical
jets. All in all, another great success for DSSU theory.
And so, the revolution in cosmology continues …
–C. Ranzan (2019-4)
† C. Ranzan, Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism,
Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology Vol.5,
No.2, pp.520-551 (2019). [Reprint]
Back to Top |
2019-6
Top of page
Back to DSSU Home Page
|
|