The   Dynamic   Steady   State   Universe

  Home     DSSU Directory     Advance Search     Published Articles     Questions & Comments     For Educators   

ANNOUNCEMENTS & NEW ITEMS:
(Most recent at top of column)



(2024 July 12): Press Release: Remarkable convergence of gravity theory and empirical evidence has revealed the cosmic-scale geometry of the Universe.
The DSSU research article "Natural Cosmic-Scale Geometry of Our Universe" has now been published. Links are posted here. □

Meanwhile, the war on civilization escalates:
● See the reports at Big Sky Free Press –Beyond the Headlines (http://www.bsfreepress.net/)
● Assassination attempt on President Donald Trump (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozCQwPyVKlE).


(2024 June 21): After some now-familiar rounds of fake reviews and rejections, the latest DSSU research article —entitled Natural Cosmic-Scale Geometry of Our Universe— has been accepted for publication. It is an outstanding work, outstanding in the sense that the underlying theory agrees wonderfully with the empirical evidence —the abundant and incontrovertible astronomical observations. This is science of the highest standard. And yet, one reviewer flatly asserted, “It is completely unscientific,” and recommended rejecting the article (prompting the editor of the Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology to decline its publication). What!? Thirty-eight supporting references is not science!? And what about the text and diagrammatic content being as clear as a cloudless day? … Yes, that journal, and two others, recognized a serious threat to their sacred Worldview. □

Meanwhile the decline of civilization and the loss of freedom continues.
   There is an ongoing reinstitution of the ancient practice of slavery. "During this revival of servitude and oppression, the systems of enslavement have been greatly upgraded and enhanced, for the purpose of effectively enslaving the entire human race."
   "One of the true motivations behind the DNA altering vaccines, that are being imposed on all of humanity, is to genetically engineer mankind with a view to create a new model of human that will perfectly obey their modern masters."
–Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Corona Investigative Committee, Grand Jury Summary ( www.StopWorldControl.com )



(2024 March 8): The Cosmic Geometry paper is currently being peer-reviewed.

Meanwhile:The disintegration of Western civilization is proceeding so rapidly that I cannot keep up with it even as a full time job. … It is happening right in front of our eyes.” –PaulCraigRoberts.org

(2024 February): New research paper, focusing on the large-scale geometry of the Cosmos, is currently being readied for publication. It details the arrangement of gravity cells and how the rhombic dodecahedron is embedded within a superoctahedron.
 

Meanwhile: Reflect on the mega-crime of the last century —Dresden Hellstorm (February 13-15, 1945). It is appalling to think its perpetrators were actually hailed as war heroes!
The Blood of Dresden by Kurt Vonnegut
Dresden 1945: The Devil’s Tinderbox by Charles Lutton



(2023 October): The Gerhard Herzberg Award, 2023: Canada's most prestigious prize for science and engineering went to Yoshua Bengio, a scientist who helped make the AI revolution possible. As the scientific director of the Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms and professor at the University of Montreal, he is both excited and cautious about the future of the technology he helped create. Congratulations.

(2023 October 12): George Orwell Free Speech Award, 2023: Congratulations to Jurgen Neumann who was presented with the award “For outstanding courage in challenging censorship and defending freedom in pursuit of the truth and for outstanding talent as a freedom communicator & videographer …”



(2023 September): Newly posted: Question regarding The Fermi Paradox. Where are other advanced civilizations?

Meanwhile, history continues to repeat itself and teach essential lessons:
“As is becoming increasingly more obvious, even to historical novices, mainstream academia, mass media and what passes for journalism these days is agenda driven, not truth driven. Certain narratives and ideas that advance particular agendas are elevated and promoted, while dissenting or alternative perspectives and viewpoints are hysterically dismissed or censored.” –The Barnes Review Vol.29, No.5 (Sept/Oct 2023, p69)



(2023 August): Important UPDATE to the so-call discovery/detection of gravity waves (the ones predicted by Einstein’s geometric gravity theory). Turns out no gravity waves were detected! Just as I had suspected and reported years ago. … What the LIGO and VIRGO teams actually found was a match-up between measured signal noise and preprogrammed idealized wave patterns (i.e., computer stored preexisting general-relativity gravity waves). It was simply the result of a computerized search to obtain a very approximate and partial fit between measured signal and simulated “chirps.” …What was presented to the ever-credulous public was not the actual recorded waves, but rather the pre-stored-in-computer-memory idealized wave patterns! Such are the findings of a collaboration of four researchers. [Abstract & link to full article in the International Astronomy and Astrophysics Research Journal]

Meanwhile, the collapse continues:
“The United States is falling apart in real time.” –The Barnes Review (July/Aug 2023, p30)

Suppressed is the essence of the spirit needed to resist the accompanying enslavement: “That traditional suspicion and disdain of an overreaching centralized government; that ambitious, fearless, risk-taking outlook; that love of individual liberty and personal freedom; that hardworking, productive, can-do attitude —these and similar characteristics are the essence of the true American spirit.” –The Barnes Review (July/Aug 2023, p22)



(2023 July 28): Author’s Curriculum Vitae has been updated to include the discovery of meta-thermodynamics processes.

(2023 July 21): The revolution in cosmology continues. The first documentation of Nature’s entropy-lowering mechanism —involving a structure encompassing two separate and independent processes— has been published. The latest DSSU article presents a discussion of how cosmic-scale entropy neutrality is maintained —how two processes prevent the Universe from ever running down. Press Release.
Meanwhile: The Great Enslavement continues. The ongoing implementation measures and events —including real and imagined crises— are too numerous for the average person to keep track of, let alone deal with. Sometimes too covert to recognize. Oftentimes seemingly benevolent, like the pending implementation of digital currency. And always propagandized.


(2023 July 1): The report on Nature’s Entropy-Lowering Processes has been accepted for publication. Five of five journal-appointed Reviewers deemed the research article to be "scientifically correct." ... Details to follow.



(2023 March 24 ... April 15): Latest research paper Nature’s Entropy-Lowering Processes is currently under review.

Meanwhile: Tyranny in Canada! The persecution of Pastor Artur Pawlowski. Listen to the incredible first-hand account: Just Right Program #802 (2023-3-16)

(2023 February): DSSU research article currently being prepared deals with entropy ... with a focus on Nature's remarkable entropy-lowering mechanism.

(2023 January 16): Who would believe it! An American official holiday for communism and its foremost promoter. Clearly the lessons of history have been ignored … all the while the repression, and enslavement, continues.

(2023 January):  DSSU Cosmology is now into its 22nd year on the Internet —the revolution continues.




ANNOUNCEMENTS & comments from earlier years are available HERE.
 



(2022 December 28): Now PUBLISHED !

“Laws of Physics Twentieth-Century Scientists Overlooked”
 

Available on AMAZON.com
and on amazon.ca



The Nature of Gravitational Collapse

Subtitle: How the photon, the particle of light, is responsible for mass, gravity, superneutron stars, and supermassive black holes


—Reveals the truth about stellar and supermassive black holes.


This work contains 311+ pages, 67 illustrations, references, and index. …
Second printing details (2017 November)
First printing details (Lambert Academic Publishing, 2017 July)
 



Guide to the Construction of the Natural Universe

Participate in a unique exploration of the Cosmos: venture into the sub-atomic realm, even into the sub-quantum realm where the roots of reality reside, and into the domain of cosmic-scale cell-structure and beyond to infinity. Along the way, discover the cause of mass, the cause of gravitation, and rediscover Einstein’s “nonponderable” aether and Heraclitus’ harmony-of-opposites principle. … The book represents the ultimate vindication for all the skeptics who resisted the "preposterous" Big Bang mythology and who refused to join the exploding-cosmos religion.
The book contains 317 pages, 61 illustrations, references, and index …
Available from C-FAR Books.
Or use this mail-in Order Form.
(Also available at  Niagara Falls Public Library)
 



POPULAR RESEARCH PAPERS:


Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism –Published in Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, Vol.5, No.2 (2019). HTML version.

Nature’s Supreme Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Nonmaterial Aether –Published in Infinite Energy Magazine Vol.24, Issue#144 (2019 March/April)

The Nature of Gravity –How One Factor Unifies Gravity’s Convergent, Divergent, Vortex, and Wave Effects –Published in the International Journal of Astrophysics and Space ScienceVol.6, No.5, 2018.
-------------------------
Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme Energy Particles –Published in Physics Essays Vol.31, No.3, p358 (2018). (Reprint)
-------------------------
Sachs-Wolfe Effect Disproof –Published in the International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol.6, No.1, 2018. ( Abstract & Links.)

"The Nature of Gravitational Collapse"
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics. ( Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig-10 caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r2.)


Glossary of Terms used in Cosmology and Astrophysics with particular emphasis on DSSU theory.
(Opens in separate Window or Tab)

GENERAL INTEREST ARTICLES:

Mysteries & Paradoxes that Plague Standard Cosmology  (Updated 2015-7)

Cosmology Crisis of 1998 (Revised 2015-5)

Critique of Conventional Cosmology ... comments relating to the 'preposterous' expanding-universe paradigm.
Bafflement —the remarkable admission of a physicist.
The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened   —During the 20th century there was a decades-long debate: The cataclysmic expanding universe VS the stable expanding universe. But there has never been a debate of the dynamic expanding universe VS the dynamic non-expanding universe. (Posted 2011 Oct)

Models of the Universe —Historical, Expanding, and Cellular universes. INCLUDES USEFUL TABLES FOR COMPARING THEORIES.

The Universe Is Infinite (Part 1) —overcoming a "central" problem of cosmology theories.

The Universe Is Infinite (Part 2) —an explanation of how the universe can always have existed and will always exist.

DSSU, The Non-Expanding Universe: Structure, Redshift, Distance —A long sought-after goal of astrophysicists has been a formulation of cosmic distance that is independent of the speed of light. The goal has now been achieved. The present Paper details the surprisingly simple distance expression and its validating agreement with Supernova data.

Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity —Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force. (Re-Posted February, 2014)

Gravity and Lambda —A Story of Opposites (.htm) —A story of opposites in harmony. Key differences between the Conventional Cosmology and the New Cosmology are presented.

Dynamic Cosmic Cell —The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system.

Why Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity —“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his relativity theories.”


Questions & Answers & Comments
 

COSMOLOGY ARTICLES, etc:

(2016 June) FREE DOWNLOAD details:
DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence
, Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455-473 (2015 Dec) —Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang. Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "well-written and incisive article."


The Dynamic Steady State Universe.
This work brings together the main pieces of the cosmic puzzle in a step-by-step construction of the Natural Universe. Published in Physics Essays Vol.27 No.2 (2014 June issue) (PDF download)  "... the arguments are well-made. The article is competent, enjoyable and readable." —Reviewer for Physics Essays Journal


Revolutionary:
Olbers’ Paradox Resolved for the Infinite Non-Expanding Universe
, American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics Vol.4, No.1, (2016 January). Abstract & links. Reprint PDF.
Excerpts:
● “The man accredited with discovering universe expansion did not believe that the universe was expanding. Hubble was convinced that the key evidence, the cosmic redshift, was caused by some other factor, something more fundamental than mere expansion.”
● “With the recent discovery of a new cosmic-redshift mechanism, and its theoretical validation, it turns out that Hubble was right.”
● Explains how “an infinite, non-expanding, perpetually regenerating universe" is able to predict a dark night sky.


Cosmic Redshift in the Nonexpanding Cellular Universe  ( Journal links ) —details the actual causal mechanism. Published in the American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol.2, No.5 (2014) Abstract.
Local copy with quality images: (Reprint pdf).
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Entirely new concept for cosmic redshift mechanism;
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology;
• But does not require whole-universe expansion;
• A redshift based on the DSSU theory of unified gravity & cosmic cellular structure;
• Remarkable agreement with independently established redshift distances.

The Cosmology Debate That Never Happened
What historians call "the greatest cosmological debate in history” was between TWO  expanding universes —two hypothetical models that share the same, I repeat, the same foundational property! If one is to claim some great clash of ideas (let alone the "greatest") then surely there must exist some deep dividing difference! (Posted 2011-10)

The Case for a Cellular Universe
—the Story of a Baffling Omission in Modern Cosmology    (Rev2014)
 

Large-Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe published in the American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol.4, No.6, 2016, pp.65-77. Astract and Links.
Highlights:
■ Presents the first 2 of the 4 main postulates that define the DSSU.
■ Space-medium expansion and contraction are perpetually held in balance, thus ensuring a non-expanding universe.
■ Explains how the two dynamic processes of the DSSU’s space medium sustain the cellular structure responsible for the pattern of matter distribution in our Universe.
 

Galaxy Morphology:

Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving Galaxies,  American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Journal  Abstract and Links.
Local  high-resolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA here.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the first-ever natural explanation for the cause of the elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the absurd concept of whole-universe expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!

Cosmic-Redshift Distance Law Without c Without H Comments & Links Simplifying the redshift-distance formula by removing the speed-of-light constant and the Hubble parameter —while maintaining agreement with observational evidence.
 

EXTERNAL LINKS:


Cosmic Core website: Lavishly illustrated. Includes many articles discussing DSSU theory and cosmology.

New Illuminati
–The DSSU is The New Cosmology

New Illuminati –Hidden Substrate of Reality

Big Bang Never Happened –Home & Summary

Just Right program #623
Canadian broadcaster Robert Metz focuses on cosmology. This is a superb show in which he exposes the absurdity of the Big Bang hypothesis, delves into some key aspects of the DSSU, and praises the veracity of the modern steady-state perspective.
Originally aired 2019-9-19.

 

DSSU Theory:

DSSU Validated by Redshift Theory and Structural Evidence, Physics Essays, Vol.28, No.4, p455-473 (2015 Dec) —Delivers the coup de grâce to the Big Bang. Abstract & Links.
Both Reviewers enthusiastically endorsed this "well-written and incisive article."



A historical tour of universes culminating with the Natural Universe —This essay gives a thematic tour of historical and modern universes. ... While the Universe is endlessly speaking, forever sending signals; philosophers and scientists listen and interpret.

Currently undergoing revision and updating: Theoretical Foundation and Pillars of the Dynamic Steady State Universe —The first complete presentation of all four postulates of DSSU theory. A powerful paper that resolves the cause-of-causes paradox, explains the non-independent nature of time, and reveals the 'supreme advantage'. It includes a concise comparison with standard cosmology focusing on real-world viability.
 


The Fundamental Process of Energy —A Qualitative Unification of Energy, Mass, and Gravity. (Abstract & Reviews & Links) … This article reveals the secret behind photon confinement. (Contains only a bare minimum of mathematics and mainly in one of the 14 sections.)
PART 1 published in Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #113 (Jan/Feb 2014)
PART 2 published in Infinite Energy Magazine    Issue #114 (Mar/Apr 2014)

Headlined as:
A "Conceptual Unification of Energy, Mass and Gravity"



Dynamic Cosmic Cell —The Structural Component of the DSSU —Animated image and discussion of the self-sustaining, self-balancing system.

Unified Gravitation Cells of the DSSU —Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells

Aether Flow Equations and Expansion-Contraction Rates (pdf) —This paper explores the mathematical aspects of the two space-medium postulates of DSSU theory —and uncovers some profound consequences.
 

ARTICLES on AETHER:

Documentary movie footage in which Einstein states, "There exists an aether"
High resolution .mpg video.
Low resolution .wmv video.


The Aether Experiments and the Impact on Cosmology —Aether was detected first in 1887 and then several more times during the 20th century. Its 21st–century "rediscovery" (in 2001) led to the long-sought causal mechanism of gravity —a discovery which has revolutionizing cosmology.

Michelson-Morley and the Story of the Aether Theory —Richard Milton's analysis of the historical details involving the misrepresentation, bias, and cover-up that hampered the Aether theory.

The History of the Aether Theory —The historic development of the aether as a scientific theory of the universal space medium. What started as the "fifth element" of Antiquity becomes molded by theoretical constraints and experimental evidence into the dual-dynamic sub-quantum medium —the Essence of the Universe. (Updated 2019-12)

Relativity of Time in the Aether-Space of the DSSU —How intrinsic time and relative time are related.

DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to Aether-Space —Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication, Physics  Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010). ABSTRACT

Physical Nature of Length Contraction —the DSSU Theory of Length Contraction Induced by Absolute Motion.
An easy to follow examination of how the mode by which matter is “conducted” through luminiferous aether causes the matter to contract. A simple derivation of the mathematical expression for this physical phenomenon is presented. There is also a brief discussion of relevant historical aspects and of nonphysical length contraction.
Reviewer's comments: “This is amazing …”  “The paper is interesting …” –Applied Physics Research reviewer. Published in Applied Physics Research journal Vol.5, No.1 (2013 Feb).

Contradiction Divides Two Aether Theories —An exploration into the three parts of the speed-of-light postulate.
Reprinted by permission of PEP, from  Physics Essays Journal (Vol 24, No.3, Sept, 2011) ... ABSTRACT

Basic-level mathematical and graphical exploration of dynamic aether flow: PDF

Here is an external webpage with an extensive list of research papers on the aether-drift experiments, and the larger question of energy in space.

DSSU RESEARCH PAPERS:

Sachs-Wolfe Effect Disproof (published in in the International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science Vol.6, No.1, 2018.)
Abstract & links.

DSSU Cosmic Redshift-Distance Relation (htm) —Converting the cosmic redshift into distance for our Cellular Universe using a simple and elegant equation.

Large Scale Structure of the Dynamic Steady State Universe (pdf)   How a dual-dynamic space medium sustains the cellular structure (published in AJAA in 2016).
  —Presents the postulates and implications of regional space-medium expansion and contraction.

Cosmic-Scale Structural Features Explained (pdf) (Chapter 2 of original DSSU Manuscript)
—The Spacing of Clusters
—Sheets of Galaxies
—Supernodes
—Right-angled Walls of Galaxies.


The Cosmic Background Radiation in the DSSU —The natural explanation of the microwave background radiation applicable to the natural Cellular Universe.

Ellipticity, Its Origin & Progression in Comoving GalaxiesAmerican Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, AJAA, Vol.3, No.2, 2015.
Journal  Abstract and Links
Local  high-resolution PDF.
HTML version available from AJAA here.
HIGHLIGHTS:
• Provides the first-ever natural explanation for the cause of the elliptical shape of nonrotating galaxies
• Retains the foundation premise of all modern cosmology but rejects the absurd concept of whole-universe expansion
• Takes full advantage of the universe’s cosmic cellular structure and exploits the DSSU theory of unified gravity domains
• Amazingly, the mechanism that stretches galaxies turns out to be the very same mechanism that causes the cosmic spectral redshift!

GRAVITY:

The Nature of Gravity –How One Factor Unifies Gravity’s Convergent, Divergent, Vortex, and Wave Effects –Published in International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science (IJASS), Vol.6, No.5, 2018, pp.73-92. (Abstract and Links.) "Revolutionary"



The Nature of Gravitational Collapse
–Published in American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics Vol.4, No.2, 2016, pp.15-33. (Abstract and Links.)
(Note, there is a typo in AJA&A posted version in the Fig-10 caption. It should read: … acceleration is proportional to 1/r2.)



Gravity and Dark Energy (How they Shape the Universe) –An Introduction. Provides a preamble and overview for a couple of earlier DSSU articles.



The Processes of Gravitation –The Cause and Mechanism of Gravitation by C. Ranzan –A revolutionary paper on gravity published in J. Mod. Phys. Appl. Vol.2014:3 (2014).
(Abstract & Reviews & Links. Includes link to hi-resolution PDF)



Why Copernicus Did Not Need a Force of Gravity —Explores the question of why no one, except Newton, invoked a force. (Rev 2011-9)

First ever, journal-published paper featuring the DSSU:
The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery –Ranzan
Reprinted by permission of PEP, from Physics Essays, Vol 23, No1, p75-87 (2010 Mar). ABSTRACT
This is the cure for the fallacious belief in cosmic-scale Dark Matter.

The Story of Gravity and Lambda –How the Theory of Heraclitus Solved the Dark Matter Mystery (Color version) –Ranzan Considered "an excellent contribution to the [PE journal]" --professional reviewer (2010).

Unified Gravitation Cells of the DSSU —Constructing the Universe with Cosmic Gravity Cells

RELATIVITY ARTICLES:

Why Einstein Did Not Receive the Nobel Prize for His Theory of Relativity (●Abstract ●Links ●Excerpts ●Extras) —“By 1922 Einstein had been nominated about fifty times —most were for his relativity theories.”

Einstein’s Simple Mathematical Trick –and the Illusion of a Constant Speed of Light  (Abridged version with links to Journal-published version. Posted 2013)

Extended Relativity –Exploiting the Loopholes in Einstein's Relativity. A Logical extension of special relativity. Reprinted by permission of PEP, from Physics Essays Vol.25, No.3 (2012).
Abstract & Links & Reviews


The Three Components of the Speed-of-Light Postulate.  Published in Physics Essays journal Vol.26,No.1 (2013)
Local copy: The Three Components of the Speed-of-Light Postulate (pdf) Absolute vs relative. Variance vs invariance. Another instance of the Heraclitian "Harmony of Opposites." (Reprinted by permission of PEP, from Physics Essays, Vol.26, No.1, 2013).

Relativity of Time in the Aether Medium of the DSSU —Absolute Motion and Intrinsic Time

Resolving a Paradox in Special Relativity –Absolute Motion and the Unified Doppler Equation.
(Posted 2011, July). Reprinted by permission of PEP, from Physics  Essays Vol.23, No.4, p594 (2010). ABSTRACT

How DSSU Relativity Resolves the Speed Paradox (Introductory Discussion)   —Absolute Motion Resolves a (speed) Paradox in Einstein’s Special Relativity. (Supplementary Discussion)

DSSU Relativity –The Lorentz Transformations Applied to Aether-Space (Posted 2011). Reprinted by permission of Physics Essays Publication, Physics  Essays Vol.23, No.3, p520. (2010). ABSTRACT

The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 1) —Response to a reviewer critical of DSSU aether-based relativity
The Key that Extends Einstein’s Relativity (Part 2) —How to convert abstract-space equations into aether-based equations

Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy
Published in Applied Physics Research journal Vol.5, No.2 (2013).
LOCAL COPY: Restoring the Physical Meaning of Energy —distinguishing between the apparent energy and the real energy of moving mass.
 

An Open Letter to the Scientific Community
(Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)

"The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory. ..."  continues ...

A devastating Declaration of opposition to Big Bang cosmology signed by more than 400 Researchers.


Full text: CosmologyStatement.org or alternate site.
 

INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM:
This website is mainly concerned with revisionism in cosmology. Those of us involved in replacing the unnatural expanding-universe paradigm are aware of the difficulties involved.
   However, other revisionists have unimaginable difficulties. Consider the ongoing persecution of revisionists in other fields of intellectual pursuit: 
"It makes you wonder —about the immense effort being made by State and State-sponsored organizations with budgets of tens of millions of dollars and thousands of employees and associates to smother and punish these few men and women. Every punishing instrument imaginable is used, every vicious slander conceivable, every flagrant and pervasive form of censorship that law allows, including the imprisonment of simple writers for thought crimes against the State. ... Makes you wonder." —Bradley R. Smith (2011-1)


"Discussing truth is so controversial, so dangerous … In most of the world it is simply illegal.” Gordon Duff, Senior Editor, Veterans Today (2011)

"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." –George Orwell


● Why the suppression of free speech is so deadly dangerous: When you silence the man of the pen, you must deal with the man of the sword.” –proverb


"Free speech is the essence of Civilization."
–Stephen Molyneux, Address at the EU Parliament (2019-1-21).

 


DEDICATION: This website is solemnly dedicated to those individuals who have conducted research in their chosen field and have informed others of their inquiries and suffered the consequences when subpoenaed by the Inquisition or some variant thereof. The dedication extends to those individuals currently imprisoned, and those facing trial and persecution simply for exercising their basic human right of freedom of expression supposedly granted to them under the UN Charter of Human Rights.
"Every year, hundreds of writers and other literary professionals around the world are imprisoned, prosecuted, persecuted, attacked, threatened, forced into exile or even murdered as a result of their work."

ALSO: Be aware of the continuing threat to our precious freedom of expression on the Internet. The threat is serious and relentless. It is described as “… the formal effort to mimic Communist China’s system of Internet censorship.” – www.InfoWars.com
More information on threats to internet freedom: https://battleforthenet.com/

End of free speech in Britain:

A publisher of history books in Britain has reported that “due to new laws in the UK all their books will have to be censored moving forward” to avoid criminal penalties for “inciting racial hatred.” –The Barnes Review (2020 March/April) p77

A hostile jury, by a hasty unanimous verdict, decided that British Nationalist Leader Jez Turner deserves to be sent to jail for his critical views! Report (2018-5-15).

British Maverick Psychologist jailed for publishing his research. … “The ambivalence of librarians getting writers imprisoned quite defies comprehension.” –Simon Sheppard (2013)
 


In repressive Germany:

Ursula Haverbeck, 89, Sentenced to 14 Months in Jail for Heresy! –2017 November
This amazing 89-year-old woman continues advocating under the dictum: "Only the truth will set you free”.
Mrs. Haverbeck, along with her late husband, founded the education facility Collegium Humanum in 1963, but which was banned by the Marxist thought police in 2008.

Update (2018-5-16): Ursula Haverbeck will celebrate her 90th birthday in a German prison cell. The sprightly grandmother is now serving a two-year prison term without parole merely for stating a sincerely held opinion that is supported by acclaimed academics worldwide!!
“Frau Haverbeck is now sentenced to two years in prison, merely for her peaceful historical research” –The Barnes Review Vol.24, No.5 (Sept/Oct 2018) p71

UPDATE (2019-11): On November 9th (2019), the very day of Ursula Haverbeck’s 91st. birthday, hundreds of German nationalists, patriots and friends, well-wishers and admirers rallied in her support. Report on the Rally to Celebrate Political Prisoner Ursula Haverbeck.

Update (2020-12): This 92-year-old peaceful woman has just been released from jail, having spent 2&1/2 years behind bars, and less than 2 weeks later was in court in Berlin for more charges ...  was again sentenced to prison!!!

INFO on Monika Schaefer's case: https://wir-sind-monika.com/
For expressing her opinion on historical events, Canadian citizen Monika Schaefer has been arrested and imprisoned (2018-1-3) in Germany. She had committed no crime. Author Mike Walsh warns potential visitors to Germany to stay away from this dangerous police state. –Merkel Madness Grips Germany, (2018-1-7)
... Found guilty and sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment (time served); her brother Alfred was sentenced to 38 months!! –(2018 November)
UPDATE (2019 August 10): Corruption of justice in Germany continues. Alfred Schaefer Receives 18 Months Additional Prison Time for Defending Himself!  Punished for simply presenting evidence for his own defense in court!
 

The 2022 George Orwell Free Speech Award was presented to Alfred and Monika Schaefer, July 30, 2022 in Vancouver.
A Response & Appreciation of the Awards to Monika & Alfred Schaefer, by Timothy Cuish of the Daily Rake.
 


The Supreme Irony:


Fellow freedom-lovers and truth-seekers, please pay close attention. ... Chemist, historian, and author, Germar Rudolf sums up the persecution in Germany as follows:


“Now I will summarize here the pseudo-logic hiding behind this absurd and criminal nonsense of persecuting dissidents. This logic of those in power in [Germany] really amounts to this:


Because in the past minorities have been persecuted, dissidents imprisoned and books burned, one feels obliged to do everything in order to prevent a repetition —even if that entails having to persecute minorities, imprison dissidents and burn books. [Italics as in the original.]


Because that is exactly what is happening today! Absolutely nothing has been learned from the past. The table is merely turned around, and for a change a different group is now being persecuted.”


–Germar Rudolf, Resistance is Obligatory 2nd edition (Castle Hill Publishers, Box 243, Uckfield, UK, 2016) p213


The Continuing Struggle for Freedom

A ray of hope in the ongoing struggle for freedom. Populist and nationalist movements around the world are gaining ascendancy over the New World Order’s effort to establish global governance and impose tyrannical control over every last square meter of the Earth’s surface. –The Barnes Review Vol.23 No.1 (2017 Jan p70)


"This Is Very Serious" –S. Molyneux, 2018-7
(7-minute video on the importance of freedom of speech)
 

The ongoing fight for freedom and truth. –Just Right Media (2020, Sept 18, program)

 

● Pro-Freedom NEWS: Vanguard News
● InfoWars NEWS: InfoWars  |  AlexJones
● Freedom Force Red Pill University for truth-seekers.


For more on Freedom (and Objectivism),
visit:
Freedomain Radio (www.freedomainradio.com)
presented by Stefan Molyneux.

 Just Right Media (www.justrightmedia.org)
 


... about the author ...

Curriculum Vitae


© Copyright 2005-2024 by
Conrad RanzanDSSU Research
  For information regarding permission to reproduce selected material herein, please contact:

D S S U  Research
Niagara Falls, Canada
23 years on the Internet.
Most recent update: 2024 Aug 30
 

Visits since mid-2010 : Hit Counter

2024-8-30

Natural transformation of mass energy to photonic energy:
● Highlights   ● Reviews   ● Comments

Supplementary material relating to the published article “Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism”

Conrad Ranzan
2019

 

 

What is meant by "Mass-to-Energy Conversion" in the astrophysical context?


The "Conversion" refers to the natural transformation of mass energy to photonic energy. It is an "Astrophysical Mechanism" because it is associated with end-stage gravitational  collapse and subsequent collisions of mass particles with the collapsed body.

 

 

Contents:

1. Highlights
2. Willful Blindness? Lack of Knowledge? Professional Fakery?
3. Science Advances journal rejects major advance ...
4. Review by International Journal of High Energy Physics
5. Review by Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology
6. Press Release (2019 May): Simple extension of Einstein’s relativity theory radically changes black-hole physics

 

 

 

Highlights of the Research Article

One Sentence Summary: Using only basic physics and relativistic motion, using them in a way that exploits the distinction between apparent and innate levels of reality, the article follows a logical sequence in explaining how mass converts to energy, how that conversion leads to an explanation of the mechanism driving astrophysical jets, and further, how the mechanism provides the resolution to the long-standing paradox of stellar black holes.

 

Main theme: The procedure involves relativistic motion and mechanical energy equations. These are combined to form a simple energy triangle, which is then manipulated to explain mass-to-energy conversion. It’s as simple as that. With a child’s play manipulation of triangles the standard and new interpretations are clarified and compared.

 Exploited is the enormously important distinction between apparent and intrinsic aspects: including motion, momentum, kinetic energy, and total energy.

 Recalled is Sir James Jeans prescient insight from the 1920’s into how the process of mass conversion (to energy) is merely that of unbottling imprisoned wave-energy and setting it free to travel through space.

 

Implemented is a three-part strategy to accomplished TOTAL mass-to-energy conversion:

1.  Make the motion relative to the universal space medium. This allows the introduction of the concept of intrinsic energy (total, kinetic, and mass energies) as counterpart to the apparent version.

2.  Recognize that a particle’s mass property diminishes with increase in speed. This means introducing the concept of intrinsic mass (which varies with intrinsic speed).

3.  Impose a change in the particle’s gravitational environment. Instead of applying an electromagnetic accelerating force/energy in order to alter the particle’s total energy, there will simply be an environmental change.

 

Explored is the remarkable consequence of this mass-to-energy conversion and the associated limitless energy-amplification process. When combined, the two processes lead to a compelling explanation of the mechanism driving astrophysical jets.

 Followed is a conceptual trail that starts with “unorthodox” relativity and “bottled” energy, takes us along a natural course through to limitless power, and finally leads to stellar astrophysical jets. All in all, another great success for DSSU theory.

 

 

Willful Blindness?  Lack of Knowledge?  Professional Fakery?

When I submitted the Mass-to-Energy Conversion article to the Editorial Office of the Canadian Journal of Physics, I made it clear that “The ideas being presented are innovative, provocative, timely, and should be of interest to the broad physics community.” I emphasized, “This paper is definitely original.”

The chief editor of Canadian Journal of Physics, Dr. Michael Steinitz, rejected the work saying (2019 January 3) “it is not suitable for the scope that we have set out for the journal” … that it was not of sufficiently “high interest for the widest audience of physicists.”

Now, isn’t that odd? Apparently, Michael Steinitz believes readers of the Journal would not be interested in the newly-uncovered mechanism of the natural transformation of mass energy to photonic energy. 

What?!  Physicists not interested in a new mode of mass-to energy conversion?! … Let’s be clear, we are talking here about the most powerful energy producing mechanism in the universe. Physicists (even lay observers) are familiar with mass-to-energy conversion through mass-and-antimass annihilation; but the astrophysical mechanism being presented is an entirely alien concept to them. The academic experts have nothing comparable.

So what’s going on? … Why reject something that obviously would hold great interest for the widest possible audience?

I can see only three possibilities here:

1. Dr. Michael Steinitz did not bother to read the paper. This falls under the category of Willful Blindness.

2. Dr. Steinitz read the paper but did not understand it. This falls under the category of Lack of Knowledge.  (Highly unlikely. I say this because there is nothing in the article of a technical nature that requires a knowledge of anything beyond first-year university physics.)

3. The editor(s) of the Canadian Journal of Physics read the paper and understood it only too well. They recognized its game-changing implications. The grounds for rejection were entirely bogus. This falls under the category of Fakery.

 

Allow me to expand on the three possible motivators.

 

Willful Blindness. (I actually experienced this with a different research paper. The reviewer in that instance was honest enough to state that he did not like the conclusion and therefore refused to do a proper review. No reason was given; and the article’s reasoned presentation and logical arguments were ignored; and were probably not even considered. I learned about this from the assistant editor.) No, I do not think this applies to Dr. Steinitz. If he had the slightest tingling of curiosity and confronted with a title making such bold claims, he would surely have read the article.

 

Lack of Knowledge. Assuming Dr. Steinitz read the manuscript it would be extraordinarily unlikely that he failed to understand its content. True enough, there has been over the years a radical decline in educational standards. (The disparagement of biological evolution is a disturbing example. And most disturbing is how the world’s biggest problem, overpopulation, is ignored; while educators are endlessly promulgating the comparatively trivial issue of climate change.) It is inconceivable that any editor of a physics journal does not understand basic physics.

The paper is based on three fundamental concepts: First, the existence of a universal space medium (there is no physicist who openly disagrees on this). Second, the electron is a confined photon; and extending the concept, all the other fundamental mass particles are nothing more than unique configurations of confined photons. Third, the mass of a particle or object diminishes with an increase in speed (that is, mass is reduced as aether-referenced motion increases). Importantly, these essential features DO NOT violate the laws of physics.

 Nevertheless, say the Editor read and understood everything, but found that it just did not fit into his indoctrinatory picture of reality and simply could not bring himself to accept its validity. … It may be that Dr. Steinitz has been thoroughly indoctrinated and is quite unable to assess true and factual information. This kind of impairment is a far more serious threat to innovative thought than most people realize. Back in the 1980s, the Russian official Yuri Bezmenov warned of a growing menace creeping into the education system and our society. “A person who is indoctrinated is unable to assess true information, the facts tell nothing to him … even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures … even if I take him, by force, to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it.” (From a 1984 interview with Russian KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov.)

 

 Fakery. Dr. Steinitz read the manuscript and fully understood what it’s all about. He recognized that here is a new development that could potentially disturb the consensus view of physics. And as a lowly gatekeeper of the “officially approved” established view, his duty was, and is, to block heretical sources and guard against any dissenting ideas. He had no choice but to reject the manuscript. Or to put it more bluntly, lacking the backbone to act independently and valuing orthodoxy over truth, he had no choice but to refuse publication. But, for the sake of decorum, what was to be the justification for the refusal?

The rejection decision would have been so easy, if only the paper had been flawed, if only there had been some fatal deficiency or error in the work. Then there would have been no need for the fake excuse that the readership of the Canadian Journal of Physics would be little interested.

Like so many others who have tried, he failed to meaningfully discredit the arguments. He failed in spite of the fact that the theory is being clearly stated, purposely made easy to understand, and uses only basic physics. And keep in mind, the motivation is surely there —the motivation to find someone else’s blunder. Next to creating a successful theory, making a great discovery, there is nothing a scientist enjoys more than to destroy someone else’s theory or discovery.

 

Yes, Dr. Steinitz recognized the threat. His rejection letter closed with the statement, “I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.” But he failed to inform me that my “author account” was made inaccessible —blocked to any further submissions.

In an email to Dr. Steinitz, I pointed out how extraordinarily odd it is that he would claim this matter to be of insufficient interest to the readers of the Canadian Journal of Physics. I asked him “Do you seriously believe that your target audience, mostly physicists and others with an earnest interest in the physical sciences, would not value this new insight!? Should they not be made aware of this new knowledge?”

No reply.

Maybe he knows something about this topic that I’m not aware of. So, to cover this contingency, I had included a further question: “Are you, Dr. Michael Steinitz, aware of any mechanism involving the total 100-percent conversion of mass to energy NOT involving particle-antiparticle annihilation? Aware of any such process or mechanism? Small scale? Large scale?

Silence. No response to my questions. I really would have appreciated a response from the Editor. … It would have been most useful for understanding the bizarre nature of this rejection.

It certainly looks like “Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism” was a victim of professional fakery. Some spineless indoctrinated gatekeeper for an elitist science journal carried out his duty of guarding against new ideas that may contaminating the official line —the acceptable “editorial scope.”

 –C. Ranzan (2019-5) 

 

"Science Advances" journal rejects major advance:
rejects "Mass-to-Energy Conversion"

Date:   2019-01-08 11:08:16 AM Eastern Standard Time
From:  scienceadvanceseditorial@aaas.org  |  To: DSSUresearch4@aol.com
Title: Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism 

Dear Dr. Ranzan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Science Advances. Because your manuscript was not given a high priority rating during our initial assessment, we have decided not to send your paper for further review.

Science Advances aims to publish significant, innovative, original research that advances the frontiers of science and extends the high standards of excellence established by the Science family of journals. We receive many very interesting submissions, more than we can possibly send out for in-depth review or publish. Our decision regarding your manuscript is therefore not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your work, but rather of our constraints and goals in publishing high impact results across a broad and balanced array of disciplines.

Thank you for your submission to and interest in Science Advances.

Best Regards,

Warren Warren, PhD  |  Deputy Editor  |  On behalf of the Science Advances Editorial Team


 

My comments:  So, this highly significant, truly innovative, original research that advances the frontiers of science by solving several of the biggest mysteries in astrophysics does not —according to the guardians of orthodoxy the Science Advances Editorial Team— meet the criteria of Science Advances journal. And what are their criteria for assessing publication worthiness?  … “Science Advances aims to publish significant, innovative, original research that advances the frontiers of science.”

Such hypocrisy! They did not even perform a proper review. … One wonders: During their “initial assessment,” did they find that the Mechanism was too significant? too innovative? too original?

A powerful new mechanism for the Natural transformation of mass energy to photonic energy (supported by a simple extension of Einstein’s theory) has been uncovered but, again, an elitist mainstream journal is not interested!

Amazing but not surprising.

Almost two decades ago, Dr. Halton Arp, who at that time was professor of astrophysics at the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics near Munich, summarized the deplorable situation in science generally and in astrophysics particularly as follows:

The most harmful aspect of what science has become is the deliberate attempt to hide evidence that contradicts the current paradigm. […] In a quite human fashion, however, they [the peers] act in an exactly opposite manner —judging that ‘if an observation [or finding] disagrees with what we know to be correct, then it must be wrong.’ The tradition of ‘peer review’ of articles published in professional journals has degenerated into almost total censorship.” *

 –C. R. (2019-2)

* Ref.  Halton Arp, “What has science come to?” Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol.14, No.3, pp.447-454 (2000)

 

Review by International Journal of High Energy Physics

The initial review from International Journal of High Energy Physics was simply this:

“In general, the quality of the paper is not good. Theoretical depth is insufficient, and a lot of reasoning is not reasonable. This article is not acceptable.” –per review of Manuscript #1241023

 

My response:

To: Editorial Staff (IJHEP), Science Publishing Group (revision01@sciencepg.com) (J.G.)

The reviewer states “a lot of reasoning is not reasonable” but does not give a single example!! I have carefully gone through the paper and everything is presented logically, argued rationally, and always supported with references. Please ask the reviewer to provide instances so that I may correct the alleged flaws in the reasoning.

The mathematical reasoning follows that used in the textbook (Halliday, D., Resnick, R., and Walker, J. Fundamentals of Physics Extended, 5th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1997). This is a highly respected and authoritative textbook.

I have had other physicists go over the Paper and they reported neither errors in the physics nor flaws in the logic.

As stated in the opening section of the Paper: … “The purpose of the presentation is three fold: The first is to present the mathematical underpinning of the mass-to-energy conversion. The second is to detail the physical aspects of the conversion mechanism. The third is to examine the role that mass conversion plays in powering a major astrophysical phenomenon.” I stated the purpose very clearly and provided 20 pages of detailed reasoned arguments to achieve the stated purpose (all three of its parts).

If the Reviewer found a factual error or a flaw in the logic, the Reviewer should at least be specific as to what those are.

Regards,

Conrad Ranzan (2019-2-6)

-----------------------------------------------

 

Subsequent reviews from International Journal of High Energy Physics:

“1. The manuscript is of no scientific quality and cannot be recommended for publication.”

“2. I have read the manuscript titled Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism. The topic is interesting and took my attention. However, the manuscript structure is not enough to be published as research article/research paper, for example there is no introduction part, literature review, etc. Besides, the language is not appropriate for an academic research article, as there are many sentences starting with ″and″ and the correct usage of MeV is not ″Million electron volts (Mev)″. MeV stands for mega-electron volts in physics. In the current form, it could be classified as ″letter to editor″ not a research paper.”

[The Reviewers’ comments are merely unsubstantiated generalizations and utterly trivial issues. –CR]

 

My response:

To: Editorial Staff (IJHEP), Science Publishing Group (revision01@sciencepg.com) (J.G.)

ITEM 1. Regarding the paper’s scientific quality: The theory underlying the described Mechanism was recently published (see Reference #21). The physicists who assessed the scientific quality considered the work “scholarly and erudite”.

ITEM 2. There is no introduction literature review. The reason there is no literature review on the Mechanism is because it is a NEW discovery! No one has ever discovered any mechanism involving the total 100-percent conversion of mass to energy and NOT involving particle-antiparticle annihilation. This is entirely new and revolutionary. Physicists are simply unaware of any such large-scale process or mechanism.

Regarding “Million” versus “Mega-”:  “Million” and “Mega-” mean exactly the same thing! They both mean 1,000,000.

 

So from the perspective that matters most, this is clearly good news. The Reviewers (both previous and present Reviewers) reported NO flaws in the logic and NO errors in the physics. The Editor is fortunate to have here a high quality revolutionary paper rationally argued and mathematically supported and consistent with the laws of physics.

Please inform the Editor that I grant the copyeditor permission to change “Million” to “Mega-” and to remove any objectionable instances of “And” being used as sentence openers; as well as any other minor changes in preparation for publishing.

Thank you. Sincerely,

Conrad (2019-2-19)

-------------------------------------------

 

REJECTED. No reason given. (Rejection notice received 2019-03-11.)

 

Review by Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology

“In this paper the author gives a new interpretation of the famous Mass-to-Energy Conversion and discusses interesting astrophysical consequences of such a new interpretation.

[Recommend the paper be] published in JHEPGC because it seems that the manuscript could … positively contribute to a better understanding of the mechanism driving astrophysical jets and to the debate on the existence or non-existence of black hole horizons and singularities.” –Referee Report (2019-4-3)

 

ACCEPTED for publication 2019-4-9.

 

Press Release (2019 May):
Simple extension of Einstein’s relativity theory radically changes black-hole physics

The latest DSSU research extends Einstein’s relativity theory in a way that makes possible the 100-percent conversion of mass to energy WITHOUT involving matter and antimatter annihilation.

Moreover, the easy-to-understand new (and more inclusive) interpretation of mass and motion resolves paradoxes associated with conventional black holes.

Essentially, this article† shows: How to use basic relativity equations to explain mass-to-energy conversion. It provides the mathematical support for the recently discovered astrophysical mechanism that powers Terminal-star jets (popularly called “black hole” jets). More specifically, it details the theoretical foundation of the total conversion of mass to energy without invoking matter-antimatter annihilation.

The proof: If you like mathematical arguments, a basic algebra proof is presented in step-by-step detail. If averse to mathematical reasoning, no problem; a straightforward graphic/diagrammatic sequence works just as well. Either way the logic is foolproof; the conclusions compelling. What this means is that we now have the theoretical underpinnings for the recently discovered mechanisms detailed in two previous articles:

Natural Mechanism for the Generation and Emission of Extreme Energy Particles, Physics Essays Vol.31, No.3, pp.358-376 (2018). [Reprint]

Nature’s Supreme Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Nonmaterial Aether, Infinite Energy Vol.25, Issue#144 (2019 March/April). [Link to Issue#144]
 

A precedent for DSSU theory. For the first time, it is being published in a journal dedicated to high-energy physics. The periodical is the Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology. The article title is “Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism.”†

Highlights of the article detailing the new interpretation:

 ■ The presentation uses relativistic motion and mechanical energy equations, combined to form a simple energy triangle; and then the triangle is manipulated to explain mass-to-energy conversion. It’s as simple as that. With a child’s play manipulation of triangles the standard and new interpretations are clarified and compared.

■ Exploited is the enormously important distinction between apparent and intrinsic aspects: including motion, momentum, kinetic energy, and total energy.

■ Recalled is Sir James Jeans prescient insight from the 1920’s into how the process of mass conversion (to energy) is merely that of “unbottling” imprisoned wave-energy and setting it free to travel through space.

Implemented is a three-part strategy to accomplished TOTAL mass-to-energy conversion:

1. Make the motion relative to the universal space medium. This allows the introduction of the concept of intrinsic energy (total, kinetic, and mass energies) as counterpart to the apparent version.
2. Recognize that a particle’s mass property diminishes with increase in speed. This means introducing the concept of intrinsic mass (which varies with intrinsic speed).
3. Impose a change in the particle’s gravitational environment. Instead of applying an electromagnetic accelerating force/energy in order to alter the particle’s total energy, there is simply an environmental change.

■ Explored is the remarkable consequence of this mass-to-energy conversion and the associated limitless energy-amplification process. When combined, the two processes lead to a compelling explanation of the mechanism driving astrophysical jets.

■ Followed is a conceptual trail that starts with “unorthodox” relativity and “bottled” energy, takes the reader along a natural course through to limitless power, and finally leads to stellar astrophysical jets. All in all, another great success for DSSU theory.
 

And so, the revolution in cosmology continues …


–C. Ranzan (2019-4)


† C. Ranzan, Mass-to-Energy Conversion, the Astrophysical Mechanism, Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology Vol.5, No.2, pp.520-551 (2019). [Reprint]

Back to Top

 

2019-6


Top of page            Back to DSSU Home Page 

Copyright © 2005-2024
All rights reserved.
  C. Ranzan Email:
DSSUresearch@CellularUniverse.org
  Site updated: 24-02-13